When a patient is discharged from hospital it is essential that their general practitioner (GPs) and community pharmacist are informed of changes to their medicines. This necessitates effective communication and information-sharing between hospitals and primary care clinicians.
Objective:
To identify priority medicine handover issues and solutions to inform the co-design and development of a multifaceted intervention.
Method:
A modified nominal group technique was used to reach consensus on medicine handover priority areas. The first hour of an interactive 2-hr workshop focused on ranking pre-identified issues drawn from literature. In the second hour, participants identified solutions that they then ranked from highest to lowest priority through an online platform. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse workshop data.
Results:
In total 32 participants attended the workshop including hospital doctors (n = 8, 25.0%), GPs and hospital pharmacists (n = 6 each, 18.8%), consumers and community pharmacists (n = 4 each, 12.5%), and both hospital and aged care facility nurses (n = 2 each 6.3%). From the list of 23 issues, the highest ranked issue was high workload and time pressures impacting the discharge process (22/32). From the list of 36 solutions, the participants identified two solutions that were equally ranked highest (12/27 each). They were mandating that patients leave hospital with a discharge summary, including medication reconciliation information and, developing an integrated information technology system where medication summary and notes are accessible for primary, secondary and tertiary health provider.
Conclusion:
The consensus process highlighted challenges in hospital procedures where potential solutions may be implemented through co-design of a multifaceted intervention to improve medicine handover quality.
AlqenaeFASteinkeDKeersRN (2020) Prevalence and nature of medication errors and medication-related harm following discharge from hospital to community settings: A systematic review. Drug Safety43(6): 517–537.
2.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2017) National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Sydney, NSW: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care.
BelleliENaccarellaLPirottaM (2013) Communication at the interface between hospitals and primary care: A general practice audit of hospital discharge summaries. Australian Family Physician42(12): 886–890.
6.
BishopMACohenBABillingsLK, et al. (2015) Reducing errors through discharge medication reconciliation by pharmacy services. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy72(17_Supplement_2): S120–S126.
7.
BrodribbWEMitchellBLVan DrielML (2015) Continuity of care in the post partum period: General practitioner experiences with communication. Australian Health Review40(5): 484–489.
8.
BrowningSHattinghHLRaleighR (2022) Exploratory study of medicine communication at transfer of care from hospital for aged care residents within the Gold Coast catchment. Gold Coast Health Research Showcase. Gold Coast, Queensland.
9.
ChampionHMLoosenJAKenneltyKAJJoPP (2019) Pharmacy students and pharmacy technicians in medication reconciliation: A review of the current literature. Journal of Pharmacy Practice32(2): 207–218.
10.
ClaxtonJDRitchieJRBZaichkowskyJ (1980) The nominal group technique: Its potential for consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research7(3): 308–313.
DonaldsonLJKelleyETDhingra-KumarN, et al. (2017) Medication without harm: WHO’s third global patient safety challenge. The Lancet389(10080): 1680–1681.
13.
DurvasulaRKayihanADel BeneS, et al. (2015) A multidisciplinary care pathway significantly increases the number of early morning discharges in a large academic medical center. Quality Management in Health Care24(1): 45–51.
14.
ForsterAJClarkHDMenardA, et al. (2004) Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. Canadian Medical Association Journal170(3): 345–349.
15.
GallagherMHaresTIMSpencerJ, et al. (1993) The nominal group technique: A research tool for general practice?Family Practice10(1): 76–81.
16.
GilbertAVPatelBKRobertsMS, et al. (2017) An audit of medicines information quality in electronically generated discharge summaries – evidence to meet the Australian National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Pharmacy Practice and Research47(5): 355–364.
17.
GillespieBMWalkerRLinF, et al. (2020) Setting the surgical wound care agenda across two healthcare districts: A priority setting approach. Collegian27(5): 529–534.
18.
GjoneHBurnsGTeasdaleT, et al. (2023) Exploring pharmacists’ perspectives on preparing discharge medicine lists: A qualitative study. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy9: 100225.
19.
GjoneHBurnsGTeasdaleT, et al. (2022) Exploring the time required by pharmacists to prepare discharge medicine lists: A time-and-motion study. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy44(4): 1028–1036.
20.
Gonçalves-BradleyDCLanninNAClemsonL, et al. (2022) Discharge planning from hospital. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2(2): CD000313.
21.
HarveyNHolmesCA (2012) Nominal group technique: An effective method for obtaining group consensus: Application of nominal group technique. International Journal of Nursing Practice18(2): 188–194.
22.
HattinghHLEdmundsCBukshS, et al. (2023) COVID-19 patients’ medication management during transition of care from hospital to virtual care: A cross-sectional survey and audit. Pharmacy11(5): 157.
23.
HutchingsHARapportFLWrightS, et al. (2010) Obtaining consensus regarding patient-centred professionalism in community pharmacy: Nominal group work activity with professionals, stakeholders and members of the public. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice18(3): 149–158.
JohnstonKCassimatisJHattinghHL (2024) Effects of inadequate hospital clinical handover on metropolitan general practitioners in Queensland: A qualitative study. The Australian Journal of General Practice53(8): 583–588.
26.
JokanovicNWangKNDooleyMJ, et al. (2017) Prioritizing interventions to manage polypharmacy in Australian aged care facilities. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy13(3): 564–574.
27.
KosariSYeeKCMulhallS, et al. (2020) Pharmacists’ perspectives on the use of my health record. Pharmacy8(4): 190.
28.
KrumholzHM (2013) Post-hospital syndrome – An acquired, transient condition of generalized risk. The New England Journal of Medicine368(2): 100–102.
29.
LatimerSHewittJde WetC, et al. (2022) Medication reconciliation at hospital discharge: A qualitative exploration of acute care nurses’ perceptions of their roles and responsibilities. Journal of Clinical Nursing32(7–8): 1276–1285.
30.
LiamputtongP (2020) Qualitative Research Methods, 5th edn.Victoria: Oxford University Press.
31.
ManiasEStreetMLoweG, et al. (2021) Associations of person-related, environment-related and communication-related factors on medication errors in public and private hospitals: A retrospective clinical audit. BMC Health Services Research21(1): 1025.
32.
McLeodMKarampatakisGDHeyligenL, et al. (2019) The impact of implementing a hospital electronic prescribing and administration system on clinical pharmacists’ activities – A mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research19(1): 156–156.
33.
McMurrayAR (1994) Three decision-making aids: Brainstorming, nominal group, and Delphi technique. Journal of Nursing Staff Development10(2): 62–65.
34.
MeguerditchianANKrotnevaSReidelK, et al. (2013) Medication reconciliation at admission and discharge: A time and motion study. BMC Health Services Research13(1): 485.
35.
MekonnenABMcLachlanAJBrienJ-aE (2016) Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes on clinical outcomes at hospital transitions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open6(2): e010003.
36.
MeligonisCHattinghHLAlcornS (2023) Junior doctors’ perceptions of hospital pharmacists: A qualitative study exploring discharge summaries and medication reconciliation. In: LivoriA (chair.) Medicines Management 2023. Cairns, Queensland: Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia. https://mm2023.shpa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/MM2023-Handbook.pdf
37.
MichaelsenMHMcCaguePBradleyCP, et al. (2015) Medication reconciliation at discharge from hospital: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Pharmacy3(2): 53–71.
38.
MullinsAKMorrisHBaileyC, et al. (2021) Physicians’ and pharmacists’ use of My Health Record in the emergency department: Results from a mixed-methods study. Health Information Science and Systems9(1): 1–10.
39.
OoiCERofeOVienetM, et al. (2017) Improving communication of medication changes using a pharmacist-prepared discharge medication management summary. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy39(2): 394–402.
40.
OzavciGBucknallTWoodward-KronR, et al. (2021) A systematic review of older patients’ experiences and perceptions of communication about managing medication across transitions of care. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy17(2): 273–291.
41.
PageATCrossAJElliottRA, et al. (2018) Integrate healthcare to provide multidisciplinary consumer-centred medication management: Report from a working group formed from the National Stakeholders’ Meeting for the Quality Use of Medicines to Optimise Ageing in Older Australians. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research48(5): 459–466.
42.
ParekhNAliKDaviesK, et al. (2018a) Can supporting health literacy reduce medication-related harm in older adults?Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety9(3): 167–170.
43.
ParekhNAliKPageA, et al. (2018b) Incidence of medication-related harm in older adults after hospital discharge: A systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society66(9): 1812–1822.
44.
ParekhNAliKStevensonJM, et al. (2018c) Incidence and cost of medication harm in older adults following hospital discharge: A multicentre prospective study in the UK. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology84(8): 1789–1797.
45.
ParekhNGahaganBWardL, et al. (2019) “They must help if the doctor gives them to you”: A qualitative study of the older person’s lived experience of medication-related problems. Age and Ageing48(1): 147–151.
46.
Pharmaceutical Society of Australia (2019) Medicine safety: Take care. Report, Canberra, Australia, PSA, January.
Raza KhanUZiaTAPearceC, et al. (2019) The MyHealthRecord system impacts on patient workflow in general practices. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics266: 162–167.
49.
SchnipperJLHamannCNdumeleCD, et al. (2009) Effect of an electronic medication reconciliation application and process redesign on potential adverse drug events: A cluster-randomized trial. Archives of Internal Medicine (1960)169(8): 771–780.
50.
SchwarzCMHoffmannMSchwarzP, et al. (2019) A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis on the risks of medical discharge letters for patients’ safety. BMC Health Services Research19(1): 158–110.
51.
SebaalyJParsonsLBPilchNA, et al. (2015) Clinical and financial impact of pharmacist involvement in discharge medication reconciliation at an academic medical center: A prospective pilot study. Hospital Pharmacy50(6): 505–513.
52.
TobianoGChaboyerWDornanG, et al. (2021) Older patients’ engagement in hospital medication safety behaviours. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research33(12): 3353–3361.
53.
TobianoGManiasEThalibL, et al. (2023) Older patient participation in discharge medication communication: An observational study. BMJ Open13(3): e064750.
54.
TongEYRomanCPMitraB, et al. (2017) Reducing medication errors in hospital discharge summaries: A randomised controlled trial. Medical Journal of Australia206(1): 36–39.
55.
TurchinAHamannCSchnipperJL, et al. (2008) Evaluation of an inpatient computerized medication reconciliation system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA15(4): 449–452.
56.
VellaKGoldfradCRowanK, et al. (2000) Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care. British Medical Journal320(7240): 976–980.
57.
WeirDLMotulskyAAbrahamowiczM, et al. (2020) Failure to follow medication changes made at hospital discharge is associated with adverse events in 30 days. Health Services Research55(4): 512–523.
58.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) Medication safety in transitions of care. Report, Geneva, WHO, Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
