Manual data-entry of handwritten laboratory test requests into electronic information systems has implications for data accuracy. This study sought to identify the types and number of errors occurring for handwritten serology test requests received from outpatient clinics.
Methods:
A 15-day audit at a serology laboratory in Sydney, Australia, compared the content of all transcribed serology outpatient test requests in the laboratory information system with the handwritten request form.
Results:
One or more errors were detected in 67/627 (10.7%) audited requests (N=68 errors). Fifty-one of the errors (75.0%) were transcription errors: the wrong test was transcribed in 40/68 cases (58.8%) – ten of these occurred when the abbreviations ‘HBsAb’ and ‘HBsAg’ were confounded for one another – and transcribed requests were missing a test in 11/68 cases (16.2%). The remaining 17 non-transcription errors (25.0%) described request forms not signed by the ordering clinician, mislabelled specimens, and wrong tests due to computer algorithm errors.
Conclusions:
Manual data-entry of handwritten serology requests is an error-prone process. Electronic ordering has the potential to eliminate illegible handwriting and transcription errors, thus improving data accuracy in hospital information systems.
ApkonM.SinghaviranonP. (2001). Impact of an electronic information system on physician workflow and data collection in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Medicine27(1): 122–130.
2.
AstionM.L.ShojaniaK.G.HamillT.R.KimS.NgV.L. (2003). Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety. American Journal of Clinical Pathology120(1): 18–26.
3.
BaronJ.M.DigheA.S. (2011). Computerized provider order entry in the clinical laboratory. Journal of Pathology Informatics2: 35.
4.
BizoviK.E.BeckleyB.E.McDadeM.C.AdamsA.L.LoweR.A.ZechnichA.D.HedgesJ.R. (2002). The effect of computer-assisted prescription writing on emergency department prescription errors. Academic Emergency Medicine9(11): 1168–1175.
5.
CallenJ. (2014). What is the impact of electronic health records on the quality of health data?Health Information Management Journal43(1): 42–43.
6.
CallenJ.L.WestbrookJ.I.BraithwaiteJ. (2006). The effect of physicians' long-term use of CPOE on their test management work practices. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association13(6): 643–652.
7.
CampbellE.M.SittigD.F.AshJ.S.GuapponeK. P.DykstraR. H. (2006). Types of unintended consequences related to Computerized Provider Order Entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association13(5): 547–556.
FifieldL. (2013). The need for usability in electronic lab ordering. MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer45(12): 14–15.
10.
GeorgiouA.VecellioE.ToouliG.EigenstetterA.LiL.WilsonR.WestbrookJ.I. (2012). The impact of the implementation of electronic ordering on hospital pathology services. Report to Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Health and Ageing, Quality Use of Pathology Committee. Sydney, Australian Institute of Health Innovation University of New South Wales.
11.
GeorgiouA.WilliamsonM.WestbrookJ.I.RayS. (2007). The impact of computerised physician order entry systems on pathology services: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics76(7): 514–529.
12.
HarshbergerC.A.HarperA.J.CarroG.W.SpathW.E.HuiW.C.LawtonJ.M.BrocksteinB.E. (2011). Outcomes of Computerized Physician Order Entry in an electronic health record after implementation in an outpatient oncology setting. Journal of Oncology Practice7(4): 233–237.
13.
HoganW.R.WagnerM.M. (1997). Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association4(5): 342–355.
14.
IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY, IBM Corp.
15.
KhouryM.BurnettL.MackayM.A. (1996). Error rates in Australian chemical pathology laboratories. Medical Journal of Australia165(3): 128–130.
16.
NuttL.ZemlinA.E.ErasmusR.T. (2008). Incomplete laboratory request forms: the extent and impact on critical results at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry45(5): 463–466.
17.
O'KaneM.J.LynchP.L.M.McGowanN. (2008). The development of a system for the reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the clinical biochemistry laboratory. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry45(2): 129–134.
18.
RadleyD.C.WassermanM.R.OlshoL.E.ShoemakerS.J.SprancaM.D.BradshawB. (2013). Reduction in medication errors in hospitals due to adoption of computerized provider order entry systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association20(3): 470–476.
19.
RudgeN.K.HolderG.VestN. (2006). CPOE and Order Tracker: Improving workflow and communication for laboratory orders in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing32(1): 7–8.
SchifmanR.B.MeierF.A. (1994). Viral hepatitis serology test utilization data analysis and critique. Northfield, IL, College of American Pathologists.
22.
SwaminathanR.WheelerM. (2000). Robotics into the millennium. Journal of Clinical Pathology53(1): 22–26.
23.
ValensteinP.MeierF. (1999). Outpatient order accuracy. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of requisition order entry accuracy in 660 institutions. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine123(12): 1145–1150.
24.
ValensteinP.N.HowanitzP.J. (1995). Ordering accuracy. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 577 institutions. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine119(2): 117–122.
25.
ValensteinP.N.WalshM.K.StankovicA.K. (2008). Accuracy of send-out test ordering: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of ordering accuracy in 97 clinical laboratories. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine132(2): 206–210.
26.
WestbrookJ.I.GeorgiouA.DimosA.GermanosT. (2006). Computerised pathology test order entry reduces laboratory turnaround times and influences tests ordered by hospital clinicians: a controlled before and after study. Journal of Clinical Pathology59(5): 533–536.
27.
WongE.T.NelsonJ.M. (1988). Quality assurance and the clinical laboratory. Journal of the American Medical Association259(17): 2584–2585.
