Australia will implement a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) over the next three to five years. Development of an e-health policy framework to support this initiative has involved healthcare providers and patients, but the discussion appears to have bypassed non-patient citizens. There is a risk that this omission may result in difficulties with implementation and uptake of the new system.
AbbottT. (2005). Road map for HealthConnect. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/ (accessed 28 January 2011).
2.
AbelsonJ.ForestP.G.EylesJ.SmithP.MartinE.GauvinF.P. (2003). Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine57(2): 239–251.
3.
ArnsteinS.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners35(4): 216.
4.
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing [DoHA], (2010). Evaluation of the HealthConnect program. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/ (accessed 27 January 2011).
BuckleyB.S.MurphyA.W.MacFarlaneA.E. (2011). Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: A survey of the Irish general public. Journal of Medical Ethics37(1): 50–55.
7.
ChurchJ.SaundersD.WankeM.PongR.SpoonerC.DorganM. (2002). Citizen participation in health decisionmaking: Past experience and future prospects. Journal of Public Health Policy23(1): 12–32.
CurtainR. (2003). What role for citizens in developing and implementing public policy? Part 1. Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration (108): 29–35.
10.
Department of Health and Ageing [DoHA] & NEHTA (2011). Draft Concept of Operations: Relating to the introduction of a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) system. Available at: http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/ (accessed 28 April 2011).
11.
GreenleafG., (2010). A national ID system to put health privacy at risk. University of New South Wales, Cyberspace Law & Policy Centre.
12.
HandelsmanD.J.TurnerL.A.ConwayA.J. (2011). Doctors breaching patient privacy: Orwell Redux. The Medical Journal of Australia194(8): 403–404.
13.
KeaneyM. (1999). Are patients really consumers?International Journal of Social Economics, 26(5): 695–707.
14.
Menzies Centre for Health Policy & The Nous Group, (2008). Survey of Australian attitudes toward the health system, 2008. Part 1: Privacy, Available at: http://www.nousgroup.com.au/thinking/index.php?article=33 (accessed 4 January 2011).
15.
National Electronic Health Records Taskforce (Australia), BriggsL. and National Health Information Management Advisory Council (Australia). (2000). A health information network for Australia: Report to Health Ministers by the National Electronic Health Records Taskforce. The Taskforce, Canberra, ACT.
16.
National Electronic Health Records Taskforce (Australia). (2000). A health information network for Australia. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, ACT.
17.
ParkinL.PaulC. (2011). Public good, personal privacy: A citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65(2): 150–156.
18.
ParsonsT. (1951). The Social System, New York, The Free Press.
19.
PivikJ.R. (2002). Practical strategies for facilitating meaningful citizen involvement in health planning. Ottawa, University of Ottawa.
20.
SlipperP.ForrestJ.A. (1997). Health on line: Report into health information management and telemedicine/House of Representatives Standing Committee on Family and Community Affairs. Canberra, The Committee.
21.
TritterJ.Q.McCallumA. (2006). The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)76(2): 156–168.
22.
TuohyC.EvansR. (1986). Pushing on a string: The decentralization of health planning in Ontario. In GotembiewskiR.WildavskyA. eds. The Costs of Federalism. New Brunswick, N.J., Transaction Books.
WestbrookJ.I.BraithwaiteJ.GeorgiouA.AmptA.CreswickN.CoieraE.IedemaR. (2007). Multimethod evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and sociotechnical theory. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association14(6): 746–755.
