The percentage of total body surface area burnt (%TBSA) is a critical measure of burn injury severity and a key predictor of burn injury outcome. This study evaluated the level of agreement between four sources of %TBSA using 120 cases identified through the Victorian State Trauma Registry. Expert clinician, ICD-10-AM, Abbreviated Injury Scale, and burns registry coding were compared using measures of agreement. There was near-perfect agreement (weighted Kappa statistic 0.81–1) between all sources of data, suggesting that ICD-10-AM is a valid source of %TBSA and use of ICD-10-AM codes could reduce the resource used by trauma and burns registries capturing this information.
Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM) (2008). Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005 Update 2008. Barrington, IL USA, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
2.
Commonwealth of Australia (2008). The International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems (ICD-10-AM). Tenth Revision. Sydney, National Centre for Classification in Health.
3.
BlandJ.AltmanD. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet8: 307–310.
4.
CameronP.GabbeB.McNeilJ.FinchC.SmithK.CooperJ.JudsonR.KossmanT. (2005). The Trauma Registry as a statewide quality improvement tool. Journal of Trauma, Injury, Infection & Critical Care59(6):1469–79.
GermannG.BartholdU.LeferingR.RaffT.HartmannB. (1997). The impact of risk factors and pre-existing conditions on the mortality of burn patients and the precision of predictive admission-scoring systems. Burns23(3):195–203.
7.
HowardP. A.JengJ. C.MillerS. F. (2007). Is the glass really half empty? A closer look at the TBSA data in the National Burn Repository. Journal of Burn Care & Research28(4):542–543.
8.
LandisJ.KochG. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics33: 159–174.
9.
MaharP.WasiakJ.BaileyM.ClelandH. (2008). Clinical factors affecting mortality in elderly burn patients admitted to a burns service. Burns34: 629–636.
10.
McNeilJ.EvansS.JohnsonN.CameronP. (2010). Clinical-quality registries: Their role in quality improvement. Medical Journal of Australia192 (5): 244–245.
11.
PerryR. J.MooreC. A.MorganB. D. G.PlummerD. L. (1996). Determining the approximate area of a burn: An inconsistency investigated and re-evaluated. British Medical Journal312 (7042): 1338.
12.
SimJ.WrightC. C. (2005). The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy85(3): 257–268.
13.
StataCorp (2009). Stata 11.0. Texas, College Station.
14.
TurnerD. G.BergerN.WeilandA. P.JordanM. H. (1996). The revised burn diagram and its effect on diagnosis-related group coding. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation17(2):169–174.
15.
WachtelT. L.BerryC. C.WachtelE. E.FrankH. A. (2000). The inter-rater reliability of estimating the size of burns from various burn area chart drawings. Burns26: 156–170.
16.
WallisK.MalicC.LittlewoodS.JudkinsK.PhippsA. (2009). Surviving ‘Payment by Results: A simple method of improving clinical coding in burn specialised services in the United Kingdom. Burns35: 232–236.
