This article empirically defines the formal pathways and processes that enable and frame hospital clinical classification in an activity-based funding environment. These structured actions include: learning and training; abstracting; clinical knowledge locating and confirming; coder-doctor communication; coder-coder communication; the complicated sub-set of code searching and decision-making processes that constitute practical clinical ‘coding’; allocation to diagnosis-related groups; confirmation of financial reimbursement; auditing; and quality management practices to ensure the integrity of the multiple outputs and outcomes of clinical coding. An analogy of these complex, exacting, and knowledge-dense work practices is made with the 20th century avant-garde art movement of Cubism: the creation of Pablo Picasso's The three musicians is used as a metaphor for clinical/health classification work.
BaldassariA.SaunierP. (2008). Picasso and his collection. Sydney, NSW; Brisbane, Queensland; and Paris, France: Art Exhibitions Australia Limited, Queensland Art Gallery, and Musée National Picasso.
2.
BloorG. (1999). Organisational culture, organisational learning and total quality management: A literature review and synthesis. Australian Health Review22(3): 162–179.
3.
CameronM.RobinsonK. (2004). The effects on clinical coding of the critical pathway recording methodology. Health Information Management Journal32(2): 74–83.
4.
ChengD.GilchristA.RobinsonK. (2007). The importance of clinical coding auditing in a casemix-based hospital funding environment: A case example. Paper presented at the International Federation of Health Records Organizations'Congress, Seoul, Korea, 27–30 May. Abstract published in Proceedings.
5.
ChengD.GilchristA.RobinsonK.M.PaulL. (2009). The risk and consequences of clinical miscoding due to inadequate medical documentation: A case study of the impact on health services funding. Health Information Management Journal38(1): 35–46.
6.
ChengD.RobinsonK.HolmesE.GarveyC.RobinsonD.C. (2010). The criticality of national-level standardisation of clinical documentation and related education requirements. Paper presented at the International Federation of Health Records Organizations' Congress, Milan, Italy, 15–19 November. Abstract published in Proceedings.
7.
ChengD.ShepheardJ.RobinsonK. (2005). The role of coding auditing in health information classification in Victoria, Australia. Proceedings of the First Asia-Pacific Medical Record Congress in Conjunction with the Chinese Medical Record Association 14th National Convention, Beijing, China, 26–28 September. Beijing, China: CHMRA: 1–4 (Chinese); 4–9 (English).
8.
Council of Australian Governments (2010). A national health and hospitals network for Australia's future. Canberra, ACT: Council of Australian Governments.
9.
DempseyA. (2002). Styles, schools and movements: An encyclopaedic guide to modern art. London, Thames and Hudson.
10.
DuckettS.J. (2007). The Australian health care system. South Melbourne, Oxford University Press.
11.
JafféH.L.C. (1988). Pablo Picasso. London, Thames and Hudson.
12.
KrypuyM.McCormackL. (2006). Provisional coding practices: Are they really a waste of time?Health Information Management Journal. 35(3): 49–53.
13.
RobinsonK.ShepheardJ. (2003). Health information managers and clinical coders: Where will they be in 2010?Paper presented at 8th Biennial Conference of the National Centre for Classification in Health, 26–28 March, Melbourne, Victoria.
14.
RobinsonK.WilliamsonD.GroomA.PerryC.WhitfieldJ. (1998). Coding practice: What are the ethical issues? Paper presented at the 19th National Conference of the Health Information Management Association of Australia, Brisbane, 21–23 October. Proceedings of the 19th National Conference of the Health Information Management Association of Australia. Ryde, NSW Health Information Management Association of Australia.
15.
SantosS.MurphyG.BaxterK.RobinsonK. (2008). Organisational factors affecting the quality of hospital clinical coding. Health Information Management Journal37(1): 25–37.
16.
SengeP.M. (1992). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York, NY, Doubleday Currency.
17.
SengeP.M.KleinerA.RobertsC.RossR.B.SmithB.J. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organisation. London, Nicholas Brealey.
18.
ShepheardJ. (2003). Coding audits – quality or quantity?Paper presented at the 8th Biennial Conference of the National Centre for Classification in Health, Melbourne, Victoria, 26–28 March.
19.
ShepheardJ.MooreV. (2010). Victorian state-wide audit program: Methodology, results and significance for activity-based funding. Paper presented at the 2010 National Conference of the Health Information Management Association of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, 27–29 October.
20.
ShepheardJ.RobinsonK. (2005). Education strategies for career development in clinical coding auditing. Paper presented at and published in Proceedings of the 9th National Centre for Classification in Health Conference, Perth, Western Australia, 16–18 March. Lidcombe, New South Wales: National Centre for Classification in Health.
21.
SwerissenH.DuckettS.J. (2002). Health policy and financing. In GardnerH.BarracloughS. (Eds). Health policy in Australia, 2nd Edn. South Melbourne, Oxford University Press.
22.
SzakielJ. (2010). Report. Hospital casemix protocol – Medibank Private perspective. Health Information Management Journal39(2): 47–48.
23.
UzkuraitisC.HastingsK.TorneyB. (2010). Report. Casemix funding optimisation: Working together to make the most of each episode. Health Information Management Journal39(3): 47–49.
