Rehabilitation and Disability Services' Quality Projects: A Comparison against the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards' Clinical Criteria

Abstract

The Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS) Evaluation, Quality and Improvement (EQuIP 4)¹ standards provide a useful clinical and corporate framework for the analysis of quality projects by both health and disability services. Two ACHS EQuIP 4 clinical standards were used to compare quality projects conducted by community-based and on-site rehabilitation and disability services, as generated by a commercial database. Reliable information is a major asset for healthcare organisations, and the use of the ACHS clinical standards to interpret quality project data can overcome a lack of conceptual framework to interpret data. Key differences in the types of quality projects entered in the database by the rehabilitation and disability services may be attributed to the rehabilitation services' relationship with the client (patient), which is time-limited according to the clients' rehabilitation progress, while in comparison, disability services provide life-long support.

Keywords

Accreditation Healthcare Quality Access and Evaluation Rehabilitation Centres Data Quality Information Management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Badri

M. A.

(1995). A study of measuring the critical factors of quality management. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 12(2): 36–53.

Bali

R.K.

Dwivedi

Naguib

(2005). Issues in clinical knowledge management: Revisiting healthcare management, Chapter 1, Idea Group Inc. p 1–10. Available at: http://www.library.nhs.uk/knowledgemanagement/ViewResource.aspx?resID=103002.

Cheah

Y-N.

Abidi

S.S.R.

(1999); Evaluating the Efficacy of Knowledge Management and Organisational Memory, Towards Healthcare Enterprise Modelling, IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge Management and Organisational Memory, 31st July, 1999, Stockholm.

Rubenfeld

G.D.

(2004). Using computerized medical databases to measure and to improve the quality of intensive care. Journal of Critical Care 19(4): 248–56.

Wray

N.P.

Ashton

C.M.

Kuykendall

D.H.

Hollingsworth

J.C.

(1995). Using administrative databases to evaluate the quality of medical care: A conceptual framework. Social Science and Medicine 40(12): 1707–15.