Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582.
2.
Canterbury v Spence (1972) 464 F.2d 772.
3.
Chappell v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232.
4.
F v R (1983) 33 SASR 189.
5.
Gover v South Australia (1985) 39 SASR 543.
6.
Reibl v Hughes [1980] SCR 880.
7.
Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2003) 216 CLR 327.
8.
Rogers v Whitaker (1991) 23 NSWLR 600 (Supreme Court of New South Wales).
9.
Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 (High Court of Australia).
10.
Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 205 CLR 434.
11.
Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] AC 871.
12.
ArnoldP.C. (1994). From disclosure to understanding: Rogers v Whitaker and the ethics of shared decision-making. The Medical Journal of Australia161: 452–452.
13.
PincusR.C. (1993). Has informed consent finally arrived in Australia?The Medical Journal of Australia159: 25–27.
14.
SkeneL. (2002). Doctors' duty to inform: Debates pre- and post Rogers v Whitaker: Swings, roundabouts and pendulums. Australian Health Law Bulletin11(3): 33–36 (quoting a letter originally published by YoungP.British Medical Journal).