Abstract
Fungal bloodstream infection (BSI) is of increasing concern in the hospital environment. This study compared routine hospital discharge data at two inner Sydney hospitals with a pathology database over a 6-year period. A high level of underreporting was found, with only 42% of the pathology database cases assigned an appropriate code in the hospital discharge data despite evidence of the infection being found in 97% of the medical records identified from the pathology database. The location of the evidence in the medical record had an impact on whether or not the infection was assigned a code. There was a greater likelihood that a code would be assigned if the infection was documented on the front sheet of the medical record. Improvements can be made to the reporting of fungal BSI if clinicians record it on the front sheet and if coders review the whole medical record before coding.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
