A two-stage study aimed to identify the effects of the critical pathway recording methodology on clinical coding practice and to determine coders' participation in pathway development. Critical pathways were found to be in widespread use, with low coder participation in pathway development and poor education on pathway data extraction. Coders favoured the traditional medical record format; private sector coders predominated amongst those who preferred to code from records containing pathways because of poor private sector clinical documentation. The documentation factors that most affected the clinical coding process were consistent with those identified previously and were primarily doctor-related.
BeyeaSC, (1996). Critical pathways for collaborative nursing care. Menlo Park, Ca: Addison-Wesley Nursing.
2.
BerwickDM, (1996). A primer on leading the improvement of systems. British Medical Journal312: 619–622.
3.
CallenJMeehanJTomornsakS, (1997). A new continuous quality improvement model for the coding process. Health Information Management Journal27(2): 69–73.
4.
CarpenitoLJ, (1995). Nursing care plans and documentation: Nursing diagnoses and collaborative problems (2nd ed). Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott.
5.
ChisholmKChuYCSzetoKFungH, (1994). Data quality– monitoring the accuracy of clinical information. Health Information Management Journal24(2): 135–136.
6.
ComptonJRobinsonMO'HaraC, and Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health (1995). Benchmarking critical pathways – a method for achieving best practice. Australian Health Review18(2): 101–112.
7.
DonoghueM, (1992). The prevalence and cost of documentation and coding errors. Australian Medical Record Journal, 22(3): 97–97.
8.
DykesPCWheelerK, (eds) (1997). Planning, implementing, and evaluating critical pathways: A guide for health care survival into the 21st Century. New York: Springer Publishing.
9.
GillemTR, (1988). Deming's 14 points and hospital quality: Responding to the consumer's demand for the best value health care. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance2(3): 70–78.
10.
Health Information Management Association of Australia (HIMAA) (1995). The Australian coder workforce. North Ryde, NSW: HIMAA.
11.
KohnD.Informatics in healthcare. In: La TourKMEichwaldS, (eds) (2002). Health information management: Concepts, principles, and practice. Chicago, Ill: American Health Information Management Association.
12.
McIntyreSP, (1998). The implementation of ICD-10-AM in Victoria: Coder participation and change acceptance. Unpublished Bachelor of Health Information Management (Honours) Thesis. Bundoora, Vic: La Trobe University.
13.
McKenzieKWalkerSKlisaninASpallekM, (2003). The Australian coder workforce survey 2002: Coders' responses. Coding Matters, (10)1: 14–17.
14.
National Centre for Classification in Health (NCCH) (1998). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th Revision, Australian Modification. (1st ed.) Sydney: NCCH.
15.
PotterP.The uses of variance. In: ZanderK, (ed) (1995). Managing outcomes through collaborative care. Chicago, Ill: American Hospital Publishing.
16.
RobinsonKEllMSimpsonDGrainH, (1990). An investigation of the expanding managerial role of medical record administrators. Australian Medical Record Journal20(4): 144–151.
SteadLHuckleS.Pathways in cardiology. In: JohnsonS, (ed) (1997). Pathways of care. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
19.
WhippleTWLittleAB, (1997). Variance analysis for care path outcomes management. Journal of Nursing Care Quality12(1): 20–25.
20.
WilsonJ.Pathways of care – a tool for minimising risk. In: JohnsonS, (ed.) (1997). Pathways of care. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
21.
ZanderK.Critical pathways. In: MelumMMSiniorisMK, (1992). Total quality management: The health care pioneers. Chicago, Ill: American Hospitals Association.
