The Broadband Cost Reduction Directive: A legal primer in cross-sector regulation of infrastructures

Abstract

Infrastructures have mostly developed and have also been regulated in silo, especially in the liberalization phase. As economic, societal and technological patterns toward convergence of infrastructure sectors can now be observed, how to regulate such phenomena obviously raises many questions. In this context, the cross-sector regulation laid down by the Directive 2014/61/EU on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks constitutes an interesting legal primer in EU law, although little discussed. Six years after the adoption of the Directive, the present paper aims to draw lessons from it, from its transposition and from the related dispute-settlement practice in the Member States, with the perspective of cross-sector regulation. What type of cross-sector regulation does the Directive bring about? What are the factors having an influence on the (im)balance between the sectors and/or sectoral regulations? It seems all the more necessary that the newly appointed European Commission (“EC”) announced its willingness to revise the Directive within the next 5 years. The study of the BCR Directive may also contribute to inform how to regulate the phenomenon of increasing convergence between network industries. The paper refers to “cross-sector regulation” as, broadly, a type of regulation where several sectors, traditionally subject to specific regulations, are brought together, irrespective of the mode of interaction between them. Particularly, “cross-sector regulation” does not assume that the sectors and/or the sectoral regulations would be placed on an equal footing.

Keywords

Infrastructure network operator interregulation cross-sector coordination cross-sector regulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ART. (2016). Avis n° 2016-047 du 12 avril 2016 sur le projet d’ordonnance portant transposition de la directive 2014/61/UE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 15 mai 2014 relative à des mesures visant à réduire le coût du déploiement de réseaux de communications électroniques à haut débit (p. 3).

ARCEP. (2016). Avis n° 2016-0448 de l’Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes en date du 29 mars 2016 relatif à un projet d’ordonnance portant transposition de la directive 2014/61/UE du Parlement européen et du Conseil, du 15 mai 2014, relative à des mesures visant à réduire le coût du déploiement de réseaux de communications électroniques à haut débit. https://www.arcep.fr/uploads/tx_gsavis/16-0448.pdf

BEREC. (2017). Implementation of the Broadband Cost Reduction Directive (BoR (17) 245; p. 97). BEREC.

CRE. (2016). Délibération de la Commission de régulation de l’énergie du 7 avril 2016 portant avis sur le projet d’ordonnance portant transposition de la directive 2014/61/UE relative à des mesures visant à réduire le coût du déploiement de réseaux de communications électroniques à haut débit (p. 5).

European Commission. (2018). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2014/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks (COM(2018) 492 final; p. 15).

Finger

Laperrouza

(2011). Liberalisation of network industries in the European Union: Evolving policy issues. In Finger

Künneke

R. W.

(Eds.), International handbook of network industries: The liberalisation of infrastructure. Edward Elgar.

Frison-Roche

M. A.

(2005). L’hypothèse de l’interrégulation. In Frison-Roche

M.-A.

(Ed.), Droit et Economie de la Régulation 3. Volume 3: Les risques de régulation (Vol. 3, pp. 67–80). Presses de Sciences Po.

Godlovitch

Plueckebaum

Kroon

Wissner

Batura

Hausemer

Vincze

(2018). Study on Implementation and monitoring of measures under Directive 61/2014 Cost Reduction Directive, SMART 2015/0066 (p. 306) [Study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology].

Kathuria

Globocnik

(2019). Exclusionary conduct in data-driven markets: Limitations of data sharing remedy. In Botta

(Ed.), EU competition law remedies in data economy, forthcoming. Springer.

10.

Kitsos

Maniatis

(2019). Les communications électroniques dans le cadre de la directive 2014/61/UE. Revue Des Affaires Europeennes, 1, 101–113.

11.

Noam

E. M.

(2010). Regulation 3.0 for Telecom 3.0. Telecommunications Policy, 34(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2009.11.004