This article studies the competitive dynamics between an incumbent and a late entrant in a market governed by network effects. Classifying markets based on decision criterion used by majority of consumers in a market, an analytical model for the likelihood of incumbent displacement in these markets is developed and corroborated using simulations. Using product quality offered and product price charged by the entrant as managerial levers, the impact of managerial decision-making on the expected market share of the entrant is discussed. Efficacy of seeding and delayed entry by the entrant in an attempt to perfect its product is also examined.
AfuahA. (2013). Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 257–273.
2.
AliA. (1994). Pioneering versus incremental innovation: Review and research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 46–61.
3.
AnimeshA.ViswanathanS.AgarwalR. (2011). Competing ‘creatively’ in sponsored search markets: The effect of rank, differentiation strategy, and competition on performance. Information Systems Research, 22, 153–169. Retrieved June 4, 2014, fromhttp://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.1090.0254
4.
ArthurB. (1989a). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99, 116–131. Retrieved August 23, 2012, fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2234208
5.
ArthurB. (1989b). “Silicon valley” locational clusters: When Do increasing returns imply monopoly?Mathematical Social Sciences, 19, 235–251.
6.
ArthurB. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
BagwellK.RiordanM. H. (1991). High and declining prices signal product quality. The American Economic Review, 81, 224–239. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2006797
BenedekG.LublóyA.VastagG. (2014). The importance of social embeddedness: Churn models at mobile providers. Decision Sciences, 45, 175–201. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/deci.12057
10.
BentalB.SpiegelM. (1995). Network competition, product quality, and market coverage in the presence of network. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 43, 197–208.
BettmanJ. R.JohnsonE. J.PayneJ. W. (1991). Consumer decision making. Handbook of Consumer Behavior, 6, 50–84.
13.
BrynjolfssonE.KemererC. F. (1996). Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Management Science, 42, 1627–1647.
14.
CalantoneR. J.Di BenedettoA. (1988). An integrative model of the new product development process an empirical validation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5, 201–215.
15.
CarpenterG. S.NakamotoK. (1989). Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. Journal of Marketing, 26, 285–298.
16.
CarpenterG. S.NakamotoK. (1990). Competitive strategies for late entry into a market with a dominant brand. Management Science, 36, 1268–1278.
17.
ChakravartyS.DoganK.TomlinsonN. (2006). A hedonic study of network effects in the market for word processing software. Decision Support Systems, 41, 747–763.
18.
ClarkB. H.ChatterjeeS. (2015). The evolution of dominant market shares: The role of network effects. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7, 83–96.
CooperR. G.KleinschmidtE. J. (1987). New products: What separates winners from losers?Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 169–184.
21.
DietlH. M.GrutterA.LutzenbergerM. (2009). Defensive competitive strategies in two-sided markets: The example of the mail industry. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 10, 3–15.
22.
DouY.NiculescuM. F.WuD. J. (2013). Engineering optimal network effects via social media services engineering optimal network effects via social media features and seeding in markets for digital goods and services. Information Systems Research, 24, 164–185.
23.
EtzionH.PangM. S. (2014). Complementary online services in competitive markets: Maintaining profitability in the presence of network effects. MIS Quarterly, 38, 231–248.
24.
FinneyR. Z.LuegJ. E.CampbellN. D. (2008). Market pioneers, late movers, and the resource-based view (RBV): A conceptual model. Journal of Business Research, 61, 925–932.
GaoS. Y.LimW. S.TangC. (2016). The impact of the potential entry of copycats: Entry conditions, consumer welfare, and social welfare. Decision Sciences, 00, 1–31.
30.
GeD. (2002). Value pricing in presence of network effects. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11, 174–185.
31.
GoldsmithR. E.NewellS. J. (1997). Innovativeness and price sensitivity: Managerial, theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6, 163–174.
32.
GreenD. H.RyansA. B. (1990). Entry strategies and market performance causal modeling of a business simulation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7, 45–58. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1540-5885.710045
33.
GuptaS.JainD. C.SawhneyM. S. (1999). Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: An application to digital television. Marketing Science, 18, 396–416. Retrieved fromhttp://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mksc.18.3.396
34.
HalaburdaH.Oberholzer-GeeF. (2014). The limits of scale. Harvard Business Review, 92, 94–99.
35.
HuangJ.LengM.ParlarM. (2013). Demand functions in decision modeling: A comprehensive survey and research directions. Decision Sciences, 44, 557–609.
36.
JiangZ.SarkarS. (2009). Speed matters: The role of free software offer in software diffusion. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 207–240.
37.
KatzM. L.ShapiroC. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75, 424–440.
38.
KatzM. L.ShapiroC. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 822–841.
39.
KatzM. L.ShapiroC. (1994). Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 93–115.
LeeY.O’ConnorG. C. (2003). New product launch strategy for network effects products. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 241–255.
45.
LehmannD. R.Esteban-BravoM. (2006). When giving some away makes sense to jump-start the diffusion process. Marketing Letters, 17, 243–254.
46.
LevinI. P.JohnsonR. D. (1984). Estimating using price-quality tradeoffs comparative judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 593–600.
47.
LiebermanM. B.MontgomeryD. B. (2013). Conundra and progress: Research on entry order and performance. Long Range Planning, 46, 312–324. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.06.005
LiebowitzS. J.MargolisS. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 11, 205–226.
50.
LilienG. L.YoonE. (1990). The timing of competitive market entry: An exploratory study of new industrial products. Management Science, 36, 568–585.
51.
LuceR. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
52.
LuceR. D. (1977). The choice axiom after twenty years. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 215–233.
53.
MarsdenP. (2006). Seed to spread: How seeding trials ignite epidemics of demand. In KirbyJ.MarsdenJ. (Eds.), Connected Marketing: The Viral, Buzz and Word of Mouth Revolution (pp. 3–23). U.K.: Taylor & Francis.
54.
McCarthyE. J. (1978). Basic marketing: A managerial approach. Homewood, Illinois: R. D. Irwin.
55.
McIntyreD. P. (2011a). In a network industry, does product quality matter?Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 99–108.
56.
McIntyreD. P. (2011b). Where there’s a way, is there a will? Installed base and product quality in a network industry. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 22, 59–66.
57.
NarasimhanR.MendezD.GhoshS. (1996). An examination of the effect of continuous quality improvements on optimal pricing for durable goods. Decision Sciences, 27, 389–413. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01820.x
58.
OhashiH. (2003). The role of network effects in the US VCR market, 1978–1986. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12, 447–494.
59.
PengG.FanM.DeyD. (2011). Impact of network effects and diffusion channels on home computer adoption. Decision Support Systems, 51, 384–393.
60.
RaoA. R.MonroeK. B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 351–357.
61.
RatchfordB. T.ShuganS. M.ReibsteinD. J.RossiP. E.BrownJ.MorganJ.TellisG. J.YinE.NirajR. (2009). Commentaries and rejoinder to “does quality win? Network effects versus quality in high-tech market. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 150–151.
62.
SchillingM. A. (2002). Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. The Academy of Management Journal, 45, 387–398.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper.
65.
ShankarV.BayusB. L. (2003). Network effects and competition: An empirical analysis of the home video game industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 375–384.
66.
ShankarV.CarpenterG. S.KrishnamurthiL. (1998). Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 54–70. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3151930
67.
SharmaD.GuptaA.SarkarU. K. (2015). Challenging the incumbent: The impact of product quality and network effects. In ECIS 2015 Research-in-Progress Papers. Paper 47. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2015_rip/47
68.
SharmaP. (2011). Country of origin effects in developed and emerging markets: Exploring the contrasting roles of materialism and value consciousness. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 285–306.
69.
SrinivasanR.LilienG. L.RangaswamyA. (2004). First in, first out? The effects of network externalities on pioneer. Journal of Marketing, 68, 41–58.
SunB.XieJ.CaoH. H. (2004). Product strategy for innovators in markets with network effects. Marketing Science, 23, 243–254.
72.
TellisG. J.YinE.NirajR. (2009). Does quality win? Network effects versus quality in high-tech markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 135–149. Retrieved fromhttp://journals.ama.org/doi/abs/10.1509/jmkr.46.2.135
73.
TimsitJ.CastiauxA.TruongY.AthaideG. A.KlinkR. R. (2015). The effect of market-pull vs. resource-push orientation on performance when entering new markets. Journal of Business Research, 68, 2005–2014. Retrieved fromhttp://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0148296315000867
74.
VölcknerF.HofmannJ. (2007). The price-perceived quality relationship: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its determinants. Marketing Letters, 18, 181–196.
75.
WangQ.ChenY.XieJ. (2010). Survival in markets with network effects: Product compatibility and order-of-entry effects. Journal of Marketing, 74, 1–14.
76.
WeitzelT.BeimbornD.KönigW. (2006). A unified economic model of standard diffusion: The impact of standardization cost, network effects, and network topology. MIS Quarterly, 30, 489–514.
77.
WeitzelT.WendtO.von WestarpF. (2000). Reconsidering network effect theory. In ECIS 2000 Proceedings. Paper 91. Retrieved fromhttps://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2000/91
78.
WindY. (1978). Issues and advances in segmentation research. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 317–337.
79.
WolinskyA. (1983). Prices as signals of product quality. The Review of Economic Studies, 50, 647.
80.
ZhangT.ZhangD. (2007). Agent-based simulation of consumer purchase decision-making and the decoy effect. Journal of Business Research, 60, 912–922.
81.
ZhouJ. X.ArnoldM. J.PereiraA.YuJ. (2010). Chinese consumer decision-making styles: A comparison between the coastal and Inland regions. Journal of Business Research, 63, 45–51. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.010
ZirgerB. J.MaidiqueM. A. (1990). A model of new product development: An empirical test. Management Science, 36, 867–883.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
