Supply chains, logistics and freight have been facing increasingly complex challenges posed by transitions in economic structures, urbanization, city design and transport systems, as well as by the externalities associated with logistics activities in urban areas. This has driven a great deal of research recently. Yet, there are no sufficient contributions clarifying the current state of thought in this field. This article critically reviews the literature highlighting current approaches in the field. The objective of the article is threefold. First, to provide a framework with geographical and functional elements of urban logistics. Second, to identify the scope of the literature, vested into a typology. And third, to define the terms that may embrace the various analytical interests of the urban logistics field, namely city logistics, urban goods distribution and last mile logistics. The aim is to contribute to organize the current and future thought in the field of urban logistics.
Adarme JaimesW.Arango SernaandM.D.CardenasI.D., ‘Logistics Behavior in the Last Mile Distribution of Alimentary Products in Villavicencio, Colombia’, Revista EIA11(21) (2014), pp. 145–156.
2.
AlarcónR.AntúnJ.P.LozanoA., ‘Logistics Competitiveness in a Megapolitan Network of Cities: A Theoretical Approach and Some Application in the Central Region of Mexico’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39(0) (2012), pp. 739–752. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.144
3.
AlhoA.SilvaJ.D.A.E.de SousaJ.P., ‘A State-of-the-Art Modeling Framework to Improve Congestion by Changing the Configuration/Enforcement of Urban Logistics Loading/Unloading Bays’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences111 (2014), 360–369. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.069
4.
AllenJ.BrowneM.CherrettT., ‘Survey Techniques in Urban Freight Transport Studies’, Transport Reviews32(3) (2012), pp. 287–311. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2012.665949
5.
AmbrosiniC.RouthierJ., ‘Objectives, Methods and Results of Surveys Carried out in the Field of Urban Freight Transport: An International Comparison’, Transport Reviews24(1) (2004), pp. 57–77. DOI: 10.1080/0144164032000122343
6.
AnandN.QuakH.van DuinR.., ‘City Logistics Modeling Efforts: Trends and Gaps - A Review’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 101–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.094.
7.
AnandN.van DuinR.TavasszyL., ‘Ontology-based Multi-Agent System for Urban Freight Transportation’, International Journal of Urban Sciences18(2) (2014), pp. 133–153. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.920696
8.
AnandN.YangM.van DuinJ.H.R.., ‘GenCLOn: An Ontology for City Logistics’, Expert Systems with Applications39(15) (2012), pp. 11944–11960. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.068
9.
AndersonS.AllenJ.BrowneM., ‘Urban Logistics––How Can It Meet Policy Makers’ Sustainability Objectives?’, Journal of Transport Geography13(1) (2005), pp. 71–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.002
10.
ArvidssonN., ‘The Milk Run Revisited: A Load Factor Paradox with Economic and Environmental Implications for Urban Freight Transport’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice51(1) 2013, pp. 56–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.04.001.
11.
ArvidssonN.PazirandehA., ‘An Ex Ante Evaluation of Mobile Depots in Cities: A Sustainability Perspective’, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation11(8) 2017, pp. 623–632.
12.
AwasthiA.ChauhanS.S., ‘A Hybrid Approach Integrating Affinity Diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for Sustainable City Logistics Planning’, Applied Mathematical Modelling36(2) (2012), pp. 573–584. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.033
13.
BalcikB.BeamonB.SmilowitzK., ‘Last Mile Distribution in Humanitarian Relief’, Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems12(2) (2008), pp. 51–63. DOI: 10.1080/15472450802023329
14.
BallantyneE.E.F.LindholmM.WhiteingA., ‘A Comparative Study of Urban Freight Transport Planning: Addressing Stakeholder Needs’, Journal of Transport Geography32 (2013), pp. 93–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.013.
15.
BalmS.BrowneM.LeonardiJ.., ‘Developing an Evaluation Framework for Innovative Urban and Interurban Freight Transport Solutions’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125 (2014), pp. 386–397. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1482
16.
BenjellounA.CrainicT., ‘Trends, Challenges, and Perspectives in City Logistics’, Proceedings of the Transportation and Land Use Interaction20088 (2008), pp. 269–284.
17.
BoudoinD.MorelC.GardatM.‘Supply Chains and Urban Logistics Platforms’, in Gonzalez-FeliuJ.SemetF.RouthierJ.L., eds., Sustainable Urban Logistics: Concepts, Methods and Information Systems (Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 2014), pp. 1–20. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31788-0_1
18.
BrowneM.AllenJ.NemotoT.., ‘Reducing Social and Environmental Impacts of Urban Freight Transport: A Review of Some Major Cities’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 19–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.088
19.
BrowneM.AllenJ.SteeleS.., ‘Analysing the Results of UK Urban Freight Studies’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences2(3) (2010), pp. 5956–5966. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.010
20.
BrowneM.AllenJ.WainwrightI.., ‘London 2012: Changing Delivery Patterns in Response to the Impact of the Games on Traffic Flows’, International Journal of Urban Sciences18(2) (2014), pp. 244–261. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.929508
21.
ComiA.NuzzoloA., ‘Simulating Urban Freight Flows with Combined Shopping and Restocking Demand Models’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125 (2014), pp. 49–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1455
22.
AlisonConway. “Urban micro-consolidation and last mile goods delivery by freight-tricycle in Manhattan: Opportunities and challenges.” Conference proceedings, Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting. 2012.
23.
CrainicT.G.ErricoF.ReiW.., ‘Integrating c2e and c2c Traffic into City Logistics Planning’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 47–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.090
24.
CrainicT.G.RicciardiN.StorchiG., ‘Advanced Freight Transportation Systems for Congested Urban Areas’, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies12(2) (2004a), pp. 119–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2004.07.002
25.
CrainicT.G.RicciardiN.StorchiG., ‘Advanced Freight Transportation Systems for Congested Urban Areas’, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies12(2) (2004b), pp. 119–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2004.07.002
26.
DablancL.RakotonarivoD., ‘The Impacts of Logistics Sprawl: How does the Location of Parcel Transport Terminals Affect the Energy Efficiency of Goods’ Movements in Paris and What Can We Do About It?’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences2(3) (2010), pp. 6087–6096. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.021
27.
De LangheK.‘Analysing the Role of Rail in Urban Freight Distribution’, in KerstenW.BleckerT.RingleC.M., eds., Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities, 1st ed. (Berlin: epubli GmbH, 2014), pp. 223–244.
28.
De LangheK.GevaersR.SysC.‘Urban Freight Collection: A Review’, in HesseM.CarusoG.GerberP.VitiF., eds., Proceedings of the BIVEC-GIBET Transport Research Days (Walferdange, Luxembourg-City: University Press, 2013), pp. 14–26.
29.
Dell’AmicoM.HadjidimitriouS., ‘Innovative Logistics Model and Containers Solution for Efficient Last Mile Delivery’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences48 (2012), pp. 1505–1514. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1126
30.
DiziainD.RipertC.DablancL., ‘How can we Bring Logistics Back into Cities?The Case of Paris Metropolitan Area’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 39 (2012), pp. 267–281. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.107.
31.
DiziainD.TaniguchiE.DablancL., ‘Urban Logistics by Rail and Waterways in France and Japan’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125 (2014), pp. 159–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1464
32.
DurandB.Gonzalez-FeliuJ., ‘Urban Logistics and E-Grocery: Have Proximity Delivery Services a Positive Impact on Shopping Trips?’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 510–520. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.126.
33.
EdwardsJ.McKinnonA.CherrettT.., ‘Carbon Dioxide Benefits of Using Collection-Delivery Points for Failed Home Deliveries in the United Kingdom’, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2191(1) (2010), pp. 136–143. DOI: 10.3141/2191–17
34.
EhmkeJ.F.MattfeldD.C., ‘Integration of Information and Optimization Models for Vehicle Routing in Urban Areas’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences20 (2011), pp. 110–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.016
35.
EhmkeJ.F.MattfeldD.C., ‘Vehicle Routing for Attended Home Delivery in City Logistics’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 622–632. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.135.
36.
EhmkeJ.F.SteinertA.MattfeldD.C., ‘Advanced Routing for City Logistics Service Providers Based on Time-Dependent Travel Times’, Journal of Computational Science3(4) (2012), pp. 193–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2012.01.006
37.
FalsiniD.FumarolaA.SchiraldiM.M., ‘Sustainable Trasportation Systems: Dynamic Routing Optimization for a Last-Mile Distribution Fleet’, in Conference on Sustainable Development: The Role of Industrial Engineering (Bari: DIMEG, Università di Bari, 2009), pp. 40–47.
38.
FaureL.BurlatP.MarquèsG., ‘Evaluate the Viability of Urban Consolidation Centre with Regards to Urban Morphology’, Transportation Research Procedia12 (2016), pp. 348–356. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.071
39.
Fernandez-BarceloI.Campos-CachedaJ.M., ‘Estimate of Social and Environmental Costs for the Urban Distribution of Goods, Practical Case for the City of Barcelona’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 818–830. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.150
40.
FilippiF.NuzzoloA.ComiA.., ‘Ex-ante Assessment of Urban Freight Transport Policies’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences2(3) (2010), pp. 6332–6342. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.042
41.
FleischE.TellkampC., ‘Inventory Inaccuracy and Supply Chain Performance: A Simulation Study of a Retail Supply Chain’, International Journal of Production Economics95(3) (2005), pp. 373–385. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.003
42.
GattaV.MarcucciE., ‘Urban Freight Transport and Policy Changes: Improving Decision Makers’ Awareness Via an Agent-Specific Approach’, Transport Policy36 (2014), pp. 248–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.007
43.
GevaersR.Evaluation of Innovations in B2C Last Mile, B2C Reverse & Waste Logistics (Antwerp: Universiteit Antwerpen, 2013).
44.
GevaersR.Van de VoordeE.VanelslanderT.‘Characteristics and Typology of Last-Mile Logistics from an Innovation Perspective in an Urban Context’, in MacharisC.MeloS., eds., City Distribution and Urban Freight Transport: Multiples Perspectives (Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 56–71.
45.
GevaersR.Van de VoordeE.VanelslanderT., ‘Cost Modelling and Simulation of Last-mile Characteristics in an Innovative B2C Supply Chain Environment with Implications on Urban Areas and Cities’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125 (2014), pp. 398–411. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1483
46.
GolinskaP.HajdulM.‘European Union Policy for Sustainable Transport System: Challenges and Limitations’, Sustainable Transport (Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2012), pp. 3–19.
47.
González-feliuJ.Cedillo-campoM.G.García-alcarazJ.L., ‘An Emission Model as an Alternative to O-D Matrix in Urban Goods Transport Modelling Un Modelo De Emisión Como Una Alternativa a la Generación De Matrices O-D Para Modelar el Transporte Urbano De Carga’, DYNA81(187) (2014), pp. 249–256.
48.
Gonzalez-FeliuJ.Peris-PlaC.RakotonarivoD., ‘Simulation and Optimization Methods for Logistics Pooling in the Outbound Supply Chain’, in Third International Conference on Value Chain Sustainability. Towards a Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies in the 21st Century Global Market (2010), pp. 394–401.
49.
Gonzalez-FeliuJ.RouthierJ.L., ‘Modeling Urban Goods Movement: How To Be Oriented With So Many Approaches?’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 89–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.093
50.
Gonzalez-FeliuJ.ToilierF.AmbrosiniC.., ‘Estimated Data Production for Urban Goods Transport Diagnosis’, in Gonzalez-FeliuJ.SemetF.RouthierJ.L., eds., Sustainable Urban Logistics: Concepts, Methods and Information Systems (Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 2014), pp. 113–143. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31788-0_7
51.
GoodmanR.W., ‘Whatever You Call It, Just Don’t Think Of’, Global Logistics and Supply Chain Strategies9(12) (2005), pp. 1–6.
52.
GuerlainC.CortinaS.RenaultS., ‘Towards a Collaborative Geographical Information System to Support Collective Decision Making for Urban Logistics Initiative’, Transportation Research Procedia12 (2016), pp. 634–643. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.017
53.
GuerreroD.ProulhacL., ‘Freight Flows and Urban Hierarchy: Some Evidence from France’, in World Conference on Transport Research (2013), p. 17.
54.
HandokoS.D.LauH.C., ‘Enabling Carrier Collaboration via Order Sharing Double Auction: A Singapore Urban Logistics Perspective’, Transportation Research Procedia12 (2016), pp. 777–786. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.031
55.
HesseM.The City as a Terminal: The Urban Context of Logistics and Freight Transport (Aldershot, Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2008).
56.
HeydariJ.‘Paradigms of Supply Chain Management’, in FarahaniR.Z.RezapourS.KardarL., eds., Supply Chain Sustainability and Raw Material Management: Concepts and Processes: Concepts and Processes (Business Science Reference, 2011), p. 149.
57.
Holguín-VerasJ.WangC.BrowneM.., ‘The New York City Off-hour Delivery Project: Lessons for City Logistics’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125 (2014), pp. 36–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1454
58.
HolmgrenJ.RamstedtL.DavidssonP.., ‘Combining Macro-level and Agent-based Modeling for Improved Freight Transport Analysis’, Procedia Computer Science32(0) (2014), pp. 380–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.438
59.
IbeasA.MouraJ.L.NuzzoloA.., ‘Urban Freight Transport Demand: Transferability of Survey Results Analysis and Models’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences54 (2012), pp. 1068–1079. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.822
60.
JanjevicM.NdiayeA.B., ‘Development and Application of a Transferability Framework for Micro-consolidation Schemes in Urban Freight Transport’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125(0) (2014), pp. 284–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1474
61.
KayikciY., ‘A conceptual Model for Intermodal Freight Logistics Centre Location Decisions’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences2(3) (2010), pp. 6297–6311. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.039
62.
KikutaJ.ItoT.TomiyamaI..,‘New Subway-Integrated City Logistics System’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39(2004) (2012), pp. 476–489. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.123
63.
KritzingerS.DoernerK.F.HartlR.F..,‘Using Traffic Information for Time-Dependent Vehicle Routing’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 217–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.103
64.
LeonardiJ.BrowneM.AllenJ., ‘Before-After Assessment of a Logistics Trial with Clean Urban Freight Vehicles: A Case Study in London’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 146–157. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.097
65.
LeonardiJ.BrowneM.AllenJ.., ‘Increase Urban Freight Efficiency with Delivery and Servicing Plan’, Research in Transportation Business & Management12 (2014): 73–79.
66.
LiY.LiuX.ChenY., ‘Selection of Logistics Center Location Using Axiomatic Fuzzy Set and TOPSIS Methodology in Logistics Management’, Expert Systems with Applications38(6) (2011), pp. 7901–7908. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.161
67.
LindawatiJ. van SchagenGohM.., ‘Collaboration in Urban Logistics: Motivations and Barriers’, International Journal of Urban Sciences18(2) (2014), pp. 278–290. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.917983
68.
LindholmM., ‘A Sustainable Perspective on Urban Freight Transport: Factors Affecting Local Authorities in the Planning Procedures’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences2(3) (2010), pp. 6205–6216. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.031
69.
LindholmM., ‘Successes and Failings of an Urban Freight Quality Partnership – The Story of the Gothenburg Local Freight Network’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125 (2014), pp. 125–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1461
70.
LindholmM.BehrendsS., ‘Challenges in Urban Freight Transport Planning – A Review in the Baltic Sea Region’, Journal of Transport Geography22 (2012), pp. 129–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.001
71.
LindholmM.E.BlingeM., ‘Assessing Knowledge and Awareness of the Sustainable Urban Freight Transport Among Swedish Local Authority Policy Planners’, Transport Policy32 (2014), pp. 124–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.004
72.
LuM.Borbon-GalvezY.‘Advanced Logistics and Supply Chain Management for Intelligent and Sustainable Transport’, Paper Presented at the 19th ITS World Congress (2012).
73.
MaesJ.VanelslanderT., ‘The Use of Bicycle Messengers in the Logistics Chain, Concepts Further Revised’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 409–423. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.118
74.
MassonR.TrentiniA.LehuedeF.., Optimization of a City Logistics Transportation System with Mixed Passengers and Goods. EMN Working Paper 13/1/AUTO 15/07/2013 (France: Ecole des Mines de Nantes, 2013).
75.
MorgantiE.Urban Food Planning, City Logistics and Sustainability: The Role of the Wholesale Produce Market. The Cases of Parma and Bologna Food Hubs (Bologna: Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, 2011).
76.
MorgantiE.DablancL.‘Recent Innovation in Last Mile Deliveries’, in HyardA., ed., Non-technological Innovations for Sustainable Transport. Four Transport Case Studies (Springer, 2014), pp. 27–45.
77.
MorgantiE.DablancL.FortinF., ‘Final Deliveries for Online Shopping: The Deployment of Pickup Point Networks in Urban and Suburban Areas’, Research in Transportation Business & Management11 (2014), pp. 23–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.03.002
78.
MunuzuriJ.CortesP.GuadixJ.., ‘City Logistics in Spain: Why it Might Never Work’, Cities29(2) (2012), pp. 133–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.03.004
79.
MuñuzuriJ.CortésP.OnievaL.., ‘Modelling Peak-Hour Urban Freight Movements with Limited Data Availability’, Computers & Industrial Engineering59(1) (2010), pp. 34–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2010.02.013
80.
MuñuzuriJ.CortésP.OnievaL.., ‘Estimation of Daily Vehicle Flows for Urban Freight Deliveries’, Journal of Urban Planning and Development138(1) (2011), pp. 43–52.
81.
MuñuzuriJ.LarrañetaJ.OnievaL.., ‘Solutions Applicable by Local Administrations for Urban Logistics Improvement’, Cities22(1) (2005), pp. 15–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2004.10.003
82.
NuzzoloA.ComiA., ‘Urban Freight Demand Forecasting: A Mixed Quantity/Delivery/Vehicle-Based Model’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review65 (2014), pp. 84–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.12.014
83.
NuzzoloA.ComiA.RosatiL., ‘City Logistics Long-Term Planning: Simulation of Shopping Mobility and Goods Restocking and Related Support Systems’, International Journal of Urban Sciences18(2) (2014), pp. 201–217. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.928601
84.
de OliveiraL.K.OliveiraB.R.P.E.CorreiaV.D.A., ‘Simulation of an Urban Logistic Space for the Distribution of Goods in Belo Horizonte, Brazil’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125 (2014), pp. 496–505. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1491
85.
ÖzdamarL.DemirO., ‘A Hierarchical Clustering and Routing Procedure for Large Scale Disaster Relief Logistics Planning’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review48(3) (2012), pp. 591–602. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.11.003
86.
PerboliG.GobbatoL.PerfettiF., ‘Packing Problems in Transportation and Supply Chain: New Problems and Trends’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences111 (2014), pp. 672–681. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.101
87.
QuakH.Sustainability of Urban Freight Transport: Retail Distribution and Local Regulations in Cities (Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), 2008).
88.
QuakH.BalmS.PosthumusB., ‘Evaluation of City Logistics Solutions with Business Model Analysis’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125 (2014), pp. 111–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1460
89.
QuakH.J., ‘Improving Urban Freight Transport Sustainability by Carriers – Best Practices from the Netherlands and the EU Project CityLog’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 158–171. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.098
90.
QuakH.J.de KosterM.B.M., ‘Delivering Goods in Urban Areas: How to Deal with Urban Policy Restrictions and the Environment’, Transportation Science43(2) (2009), pp. 211–227.
91.
QureshiA.G.TaniguchiE.ThompsonR.G.., ‘Application of Exact Route Optimization for the Evaluation of a City Logistics Truck Ban Scheme’, International Journal of Urban Sciences18(2) (2014), pp. 117–132. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.930672
92.
RaoC.GohM.ZhaoY.., ‘Location Selection of City Logistics Centers Under Sustainability’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment36(0) (2015), pp. 29–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.008
93.
ReganA.C.GarridoR.A.‘Modelling Freight Demand and Shipper Behaviour: State of the Art, Future Directions’, Travel Behaviour Research—The Leading Edge (London, UK: Pergamon Press, 2001), pp. 185–215.
94.
RennemoS.J.RøK.F.HvattumL.M.., ‘A Three-Stage Stochastic Facility Routing Model for Disaster Response Planning’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review62 (2014), pp. 116–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.12.006
95.
Roca-RiuM.EstradaM., ‘An Evaluation of Urban Consolidation Centers Through Logistics Systems Analysis in Circumstances Where Companies have Equal Market Shares’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 796–806. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.148
96.
RoumboutsosA.KaprosS.VanelslanderT., ‘Green City Logistics: Systems of Innovation to Assess the Potential of E-vehicles’, Research in Transportation Business & Management11 (2014), pp. 43–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.06.005
97.
RueschM.HegiP.HaefeliU.., ‘Sustainable Goods Supply and Transport in Conurbations: Freight Strategies and Guidelines’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 116–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.095
98.
RussoF.ComiA., ‘A Model System for the Ex-Ante Assessment of City Logistics Measures’, Research in Transportation Economics31(1) (2011a), pp. 81–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.11.011
99.
RussoF.ComiA., ‘A Model System for the Ex-Ante Assessment of City Logistics Measures’, Research in Transportation Economics31(1) (2011b), pp. 81–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.11.011
100.
RussoF.ComiA., ‘A Model For Simulating Urban Goods Transport and Logistics: The integrated Choice of ho.re.ca. Activity Decision-Making and Final Business Consumers’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences80 (2013), pp. 717–728. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.038
101.
SavelsberghM.Van WoenselT., ‘50th Anniversary Invited Article—City Logistics: Challenges and Opportunities’, Transportation Science50(2) (2016), pp. 579–590. DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2016.0675
102.
SheuJ.B., ‘Dynamic Relief-Demand Management for Emergency Logistics Operations Under Large-Scale Disasters’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review46(1) (2010), pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2009.07.005
103.
SuksriJ.RaicuR., ‘Developing a Conceptual Framework for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Distribution Initiatives’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 321–332. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.111
104.
TadićS.ZečevićS.KrstićM., ‘A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Based on Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy VIKOR for City Logistics Concept Selection’, Expert Systems with Applications41(18) (2014), pp. 8112–8128. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.021
105.
TamagawaD.TaniguchiE.YamadaT., ‘Evaluating city logistics measures using a multi-agent model’, 6th International Conference on City Logistics2(3) (2010), pp. 6002–6012. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.014
106.
TaniguchiE.YamadaT.OkamotoM., ‘Multi-Agent Modelling for Evaluating Dynamic Vehicle Routing and Scheduling Systems’, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies7 (2007), pp. 933–948. DOI: 10.11175/easts.7.933
107.
TeoJ.S.E.TaniguchiE.QureshiA.G., ‘Evaluating City Logistics Measure in E-Commerce with Multiagent Systems’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 349–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.113
108.
TeoJ.S.E.TaniguchiE.QureshiA.G., ‘Multi-Agent Systems Modelling Approach to Evaluate Urban Motorways for City Logistics’, International Journal of Urban Sciences18(2) (2014), pp. 154–165. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.929020
109.
TrentiniA.MalheneN., ‘Flow Management of Passengers and Goods Coexisting in the Urban Environment: Conceptual and Operational Points of View’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 807–817. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.149
110.
United Nations, ‘World Urbanization Prospects’, in World Urbanization Prospects: Highlights (New York: United Nations, 2014), p. 28.
111.
van DuinJ.H.R.KortmannR.van den BoogaardS.L., ‘City Logistics Through the Canals? A Simulation Study on Freight Waterborne Transport in the Inner-City of Amsterdam’, International Journal of Urban Sciences18(2) (2014), pp. 186–200. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.929021
112.
van DuinJ.H.R.van KolckA.AnandN.., ‘Towards an Agent-Based Modelling Approach for the Evaluation of Dynamic Usage of Urban Distribution Centres’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 333–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.112
113.
VerlindeS.MacharisC.WitloxF., ‘How to Consolidate Urban Flows of Goods Without Setting up an Urban Consolidation Centre?’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 687–701. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.140
114.
VerlindenT.Van de VoordeE.DewulfW., ‘Ho.Re.Ca. Logistics and Medieval Structured Cities: A Market Analysis and Typology’, Commercial Transport (Springer, Cham, 2016), pp. 369–384.
115.
VisserJ.NemotoT.BrowneM., ‘Home Delivery and the Impacts on Urban Freight Transport: A Review’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125 (2014), pp. 15–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1452
116.
WangY.ZhangD.LiuQ.., ‘Towards Enhancing the Last-Mile Delivery: An Effective Crowd-Tasking Model with Scalable Solutions’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review93 (2016), pp. 279–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.06.002
117.
WieseA.KellnerJ.LietkeB.., ‘Sustainability in Retailing – A Summative Content Analysis’, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management40(4) (2012), pp. 318–335. DOI: 10.1108/09590551211211792
118.
WisetjindawatW.SanoK., ‘A Behavioral Modeling in Micro-Simulation for Urban Freight Transportation’, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 5 (2003), pp. 2193–2208.
119.
WitkowskiJ.Kiba-JaniakM., ‘Correlation between City Logistics and Quality of Life as an Assumption for Referential Model’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences39 (2012), pp. 568–581. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.131
120.
WitkowskiJ.Kiba-JaniakM., ‘The Role of Local Governments in the Development of City Logistics’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences125 (2014), pp. 373–385. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1481
121.
WoudsmaC., ‘Understanding the Movement of Goods, Not People: Issues, Evidence and Potential’, Urban Studies38(13) (2001), pp. 2439–2455. DOI: 10.1080/00420980120094605
122.
YangJ.GuoJ.MaS., ‘Low-Carbon City Logistics Distribution Network Design with Resource Deployment’, Journal of Cleaner Production119 (2016), pp. 223–228.
123.
YannisG.GoliasJ.AntoniouC., ‘Effects of Urban Delivery Restrictions on Traffic Movements’, Transportation Planning and Technology29(4) (2006), pp. 295–311. DOI: 10.1080/03081060600905566
124.
ZachariadisE.E.TarantilisC.D.KiranoudisC.T., ‘Integrated Distribution and Loading Planning via a Compact Metaheuristic Algorithm’, European Journal of Operational Research228(1) (2013), pp. 56–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.040
125.
ZunderT.H.AditjandraP.T.CarnabyB., ‘Developing a Local Research Strategy for City Logistics on an Academic Campus’, International Journal of Urban Sciences18(2) (2014), pp. 262–277. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.926830
