This study examines the effects of postal services liberalization and postal market characteristics such as productivity and population density on sector performance indicators of price and quality of service for the EU-27 countries. The EU-27 countries are classified into two groups according to the existence of legal monopoly: high degree and low degree of market opening countries. The results, based on a cross-section country level data belonging to the EU-27 countries for the year 2010, indicate that there is not a statistically significant relationship between the degree of legal openness in the market and performance indicators of price and quality of service. Our analyses show that labour productivity is a key factor which has a statistically significant negative impact on prices and positive impact on quality of services.
AnderssonS. (2008) “Liberalization and Market Performance: Towards Higher Efficiency in Sweden”, In CrewM.A.KleindorferP.R. and CampbellJ.I. (eds) Handbook of Worldwide Postal Reform, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 298–315.
2.
BernardS. (2002) “Delivery Cost Heterogeneity and Vulnerability to Entry”, In CrewM.A. and KleindorferP.R. (eds) Postal and Delivery Services, Delivering on Competition, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3.
BoylaudO. and NicolettiG. (2000) Regulation, market structure and performance In telecommunications, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 237, Paris.
4.
BradleyM.D. and ColvinJ. (1994) “An Econometric Model of Postal Delivery”, In CrewM.A. and KleindorferP.R. (eds) Commercialization of Postal and Delivery Services: National and International Perspectives, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5.
BroussoleD. (2008) On Several economic consequences of the full market opening, Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center, no:2008–22, Strasbourg.
6.
CetinV.R. and IrmakI. (2012) Posta Hizmetlerinin Ekonomisi ve Regulasyonu, Istanbul.
7.
CohenR.H. and ChuE.H. (1997) “A Measure of Scale Economies for Postal Systems”, In CrewM.A. and KleindorferP.R. (eds) Managing Change in the Postal and Delivery Industries, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8.
COPENHAGEN ECONOMICS (2005) Market Opening in Network Industries, Part 1: Final Report, Study for the European Commission DG Internal Market and Services.
9.
COPENHAGEN ECONOMICS, (2005) Market Opening in Network Industries, Part 2: Sectoral Analyses, Study for the European Commission DG Internal Market and Services.
10.
COPENHAGEN ECONOMICS (2010) Main Developments in the Postal Sector, Study for the European Commission DG Internal Market and Services.
11.
Deutsche Post AG (2010) Letter Prices in Europe 2010, Bonn.
12.
De DonderP.CremerH.DudleyP. and RodriguezF. (2011) “Welfare and Pricing of Mail in a Communications Market”, Review of Network Economics: Vol.10(3).
13.
DiekeA.K. and WojtekR. (2008) “Competition, Wages and Politics in the Delivery Sector: The Case of Postal Minimum Wages in Germany”, In CrewM.A.KleindorferP.R. and CampbellJ.I. (eds) Handbook of Worldwide Postal Reform, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 298–315.
14.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1992) Green Paper on the Development of a Single Market in Postal Services, COM (91) 476.
15.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1997) Directive on Common Rules for the Development of the Internal Market of Community Postal Services and Improvement of Quality of Service, 97/67/EC.
16.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2002) Directive Amending Directive 97/67/EC with Regard to the Further Opening to Competition of Community Postal Services, 2002/39/EC.
17.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2003) Green Paper on Services of General Interest, COM(2003)270.
18.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2006a) Prospective study on the impact on universal service of the full accomplishment of the postal internal market in 2009, COM(2006)596.
19.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2006b) Proposal for a directive amending directive 97/67/EC concerning the full accomplishment of the internal market of community postal services, COM(2006)594.
20.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2008) Directive Amending Directive 97/67/EC with Regard to the Full Accomplishment of the Internal Market of Community Postal Services, 2008/6/EC.
FleckerJ. (2009) ‘Privatization of Public Services and the Impact on Quality, Employment and Productivity’, PIQUE Summary Report, Vienna.
23.
HermannC. (2011) “The Liberalization of European Postal Markets: The Response of Firms and Impacts on Employment and Services”, Competition and Change, Vol. 15–4, pp. 253–273.
24.
IrmakI. (2008) Evrensel Hizmet; Turkiye Posta Sektorunde Evrensel Hizmet Regulasyonu Icin Oneriler, Ankara, DPT.
25.
ITA Consulting & Wik-Consult (2009) The evolution of the European postal market since 1997, Study for the European Commission DG Internal Market and Services.
26.
MarksP. (1996) “The Relative Significance of Scale Economies and Economies of Scope”, NERA.
27.
MizutaniF. and UranishiS. (2003) “The Post Office vs. Parcel Delivery Companies: Competition Effects on Costs and Productivity”, Journal of Regulatory Economics, No:23(3), pp. 299–319.
28.
NERA (2004) Economics of Postal Services, Study for the European Commission DG Internal Market and Services, London.
29.
OECD (2014) “Airline Competition”, Background Paper by the Secreteriat, Paris.
30.
PanzarJ. (1991) “Is Postal Service a Natural Monopoly?”, in CrewM. A. and KleindorferP. R. (eds) Competition, and Innovation in Postal Services, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31.
PanzarJ. (2011) “Postal Service Pricing Incentives Following the Introduction of Price Cap Regulation”, Review of Network Economics, Vol. 10(3).
32.
Pricewaterhousecoopers (2006) ‘The Impact on Universal Service of the Full Market Accomplishment of the Postal Internal Market in 2009’, Belgium.
33.
QuirósC. (2011) “Liberalization and Efficiency in the European Postal Sector”, Applied Economic Letters, No:18, pp. 1155–1158.
34.
RogersonC.M. and TakisW.M. (1993) “Economies of Scale and Scope and Competition in Postal Services”, In CrewM.A.KleindorferP.R. (eds) Regulation and the Nature of Postal Delivery Services, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35.
WadaT.TsunodaC. and NemotoJ. (1997) “Empirical Analysis of Economies of Scale, Economies of Scope, and Cost Subadditivity in Japanese Mail Service”, IPTP Discussion Paper Series, No.1997–08.
36.
WIK-Consult (2011) “What to Expect from Postal Liberalization in Italy”, Presentation at Business International's Postal Services Summit, Rome, 31 March.
37.
WIK-Consult (2013) Main Developments in the Postal Sector (2010–2013), Study for the European Commission DG Internal Market and Services, Bad Honnef.
