Electricity networks currently face massive investment requirements. This paper argues that, given the investment requirements, (international) benchmarking is not an adequate tool for the regulation of transmission system operators (TSO). Errors in the outcomes of benchmarking will likely distort network investment and therefore the costs of doing it wrong are high. Whilst acknowledging the merits of network regulation as such, the paper discusses options to reduce the weight of benchmarking in TSO regulation and discusses options that do not rely on benchmarking at all.
AgrellP. (2012) “Benchmarking for Regulatory Compliance”, presentation at Transmission Finance: Requirements, Challenges, Solutions and Strategies, March 15–16, 2012, London.
2.
AlexanderIMayerC., and WeedsH. (1996) Regulatory structure and risk and infrastructure firms: An international comparison. World Bank, Policy Research. Working Papers Nr. 1698: 1–72.
3.
AlexanderI.EstacheA. and OliveriA. (2000) “A few things transport regulators should know about risk and the cost of capital”, Utilities Policy, 9(1): 1–13.
4.
BakerM. (1998) “‘Fund managers’ attitudes to risk and time horizons: The effect of performance benchmarking”, The European Journal of Finance, 4(3): 257–278.
5.
BalmertD and BrunekreeftG. (2010) “Deep ISO's and Network Investment”, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 11(1): 27–49.
6.
BrealeyR.A. and MyersS.C. (1996 (2003, 7th ed.)) Principles of Corporate Finance. New York: McGraw Hill.
7.
BrunekreeftG. and BorrmannJ. (2011) The effect of monopoly regulation on the timing of investment. Jacobs University Bremen. Bremen Energy Working Papers No. 9, May 2011.
8.
BrunekreeftG. (2011) Regulierung der Stromverteilnetze und Netzinvestitionen; Eine empirische Untersuchung. Study for BKW Bern.
9.
BrunekreeftG. and MeyerR. (2011) “Regulation and Regulatory Risk in the Face of Large Transmission Investment”, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 12(2): 155–172.
10.
Dena-VNS (2012) “Dena-Verteilnetzstudie”. Berlin: Dena.
11.
DoucetJ. and LittlechildS. (2006) Negotiated Settlements and the National Energy Board in Canada, Electricity Policy Research Group Working Paper, No. 0629.
12.
DTE (2004) Decision on the application by TenneT for permission to finance the NorNed cable in accordance with section 31 (6) of the Electricity Act of 1998. Dec 2004.
13.
ENTSOE (2012) Ten Year Network Development Plan 2012. ENTSOE.
14.
FriedrichsenN.BrandstättC. and BrunekreeftG. (2013) The need for more flexibility in the regulation of smart grids – Stakeholder involvement. Jacobs University Bremen: Bremen Energy Working Paper No. 13, February 2013.
15.
Frontier Economics (2008) Ermittlung des Zuschlages zur Abdeckung netzbetriebsspezifischer Wagnisse im Bereich Strom und Gas. Report for BNetzA.
16.
GeroskiP.A. (2004) “Appealing to the UK competition commission”, Utilities Policy, 12: 77–81.
17.
GrahamJ.R. and HarveyC.R. (2001) “The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field”, Journal of Financial Economics, 60: 187–243.
18.
GroutP.A. and ZalewskaA. (2006) “The impact of regulation on market risk”, Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1), 149–184.
19.
HaneyA.B. and PollittM. (2012) “International Benchmarking of Electricity Transmission by Regulators: Theory and Practice”, mimeo, University of Cambridge, June 2012.
20.
HelmD. (2009) “Infrastructure investment, the cost of capital and regulation: An assessment”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(3): 307–326.
21.
JamasbT. and PollittM. (2001) “Benchmarking and regulation: International electricity experience”, Utilities Policy, 9(3): 107–130.
22.
JoskowP.L. (1989) Regulatory failure, regulatory reform, and structural change in the electricpower industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity; Microeconomics. Volume 1989: 125–208.
23.
KobialkaM. and RammerstorferM. (2009) “Regulatory risk and market reactions – Empirical evidence from Germany”, Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 03/2009: 221–227.
24.
LittlechildS.C. (2006) Stipulations, the consumer advocate and utility regulation in Florida. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. Electricity Policy Research Group Working Paper No. EPRG 06/15, 25 February 2006.
25.
LittlechildS.C. and CornwallN. (2009) Potential scope for user participation in the GB energy regulatory framework, with particular reference to the next Transmission Price Control Review. Report for Ofgem. Available on Ofgem website.
26.
Moody's (2009) Regulated electric and gas networks. Moody's Global Infrastructure Finance, August 2009.
27.
MulderM. (2012) “Financeability of investment and allocation of costs: An assessment of the incentive regulation of the Dutch high-voltage network”, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 13(2): 160–186.
28.
NEP (2012) Netzentwicklungsplan 2012.
29.
NERA (2011) Die kalkulatorischen Eigenkapitalzinssätze für Gasnetze in Deutschland. Report for BDEW.
30.
Ofgem (2010a) RIIO: A new way to regulate energy networks – final decision. Ofgem: October 2010.
31.
Ofgem (2010b) Handbook for implementing the RIIO model. Ofgem: October 2010.
32.
Ofgem (2011a) Providing a greater role for third parties in electricity transmission: Early thinking. Ofgem: March 2011.
PeltzmanS. (1976) “Toward a more general theory of regulation”, Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2): 211–240.
35.
PfeifenbergerJ. and HouD. (2011) “U.S. transmission needs and challenges”, presentation to EEI's 2011 Transmission and Wholesale Markets School, Brattle Group.
36.
SchaefflerS. and WeberC. (2011) The Cost of Equity of Network Operators –Empirical Evidence and Regulatory Practice. Essen: Univ. Duisburg. EWL Working Paper No. 01/11.
37.
ShleiferA. (1985) “A theory of yardstick competition”, Rand Journal of Economics, 16: 319–327.
38.
SumicSid (2009a) International Benchmarking of Electricity Transmission System Operators; e3GRID PROJECT – FINAL REPORT.
39.
SumicSid (2010) “PROJECT STENA; Benchmarking TenneT EHV/HV; FINAL RESULTS
40.
WrightS.MasonR. and MilesD. (2003) A study into certain aspects of the cost of capital for regulated utilities in the U.K.London: Smithers and Co. Report, February 13, 2003.
