While much has been written about network industries, somewhat less attention has been paid to the policy networks among regulators themselves. Networks serve the collective and individual interests of members through professional socialization, capacity development, and institutionalization. Regulatory networks are particularly valuable if they help address information asymmetry, an inherent strategic advantage of regulated firms. Given potential tradeoffs associated with networking, regulatory networks must be vigilant about protecting institutional integrity. The history and culture of U.S. regulation are inextricably tied to the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). This paper presents an historical and cultural account of ‘NARUC as network’ and offers a perspective for thinking about regulatory policy networks generally.
AndrewsC. (2000) “Diffusion Pathways for Electricity Deregulation”, Publius, 30(3): 17–34.
2.
AtkinsonM. and ColemanW. (1992) “Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problems of Governance”, Governance, 5(2): 154–180.
3.
BardachE. (1998) Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
4.
BeecherJ. (2008) “The Prudent Regulator: Politics, Independence, Ethics, and the Public Interests,”Energy Law Journal, 29(2): 577–614.
5.
BergS. and HorrallJ. (2008) “Networks of Regulatory Agencies as Regional Public Goods: Improving Infrastructure Performance”, The Review of International Organizations, 3(2): 179–200.
6.
BernsteinM.H. (1966) Regulating Business by Independent Commission. Princeton University Press.
Blom-HansenJ. (1997) “A ‘New Institutional’ Perspective on Policy Networks”, Public Administration, 75(4): 669–693.
9.
BoegerN. and CokrinJ. (2012) “Resilient Networks: Institutional Inertias in Regulating Telecoms and Energy”, a paper presented at the Florence School's Annual Conference on the Regulation of Infrastructure Industries (June).
10.
BorzelT. (1998) “Organizing Babylon – On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks”, Public Administration, 76(2): 253–273.
ChildsW. (2001) “State Regulators and Pragmatic Federalism in the United States, 1889–1945”, Business History Review, 75(4): 701–738.
13.
DowdingK. (1995) “Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach”, Political Studies, 43(1): 136–158.
14.
DownsA. (1967) Inside Bureaucracy. Little, Brown.
15.
GormleyW. (1986) “Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System”, Polity, 18(4): 595–620.
16.
GrayV. (1973) “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study”, The American Political Science Review, 67(4): 1174–85.
17.
HallJ. and JenningsT. (2006) “Using Best Practices to Inform Public Policy Decision Making”, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 2006.
18.
HallacherP. (2005) Why Policy Issue Networks Matter: The Advanced Technology Program And the Manufacturing Extension Partnership. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, Publishers. Inc.
19.
HecloH. (1978) “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment”, In KingA. (ed), The New American Political System. American Enterprise Institute, 87–124.
20.
JordanG. and MaloneyW.A. (1997) “Accounting for Subgovernments: Explaining the Persistence of Policy Communities”, Administration and Society, 29(5): 557–583.
21.
KavanaghD. (2006) British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
KenisP. and SchneiderV. (1991) “Policy Networks and Policy Analysis: Scrutinizing a New Analytical Toolbox”, In MarinB. and MayntzR. (eds), Policy Networks. Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 25–59.
23.
Levi-FaurD. (2005) “The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1): 12–32.
24.
MarritzR.“Shorts and Transients”, Electricity Policy Today (27 July 2012).
25.
MarshD. and RhodesR. (1992) Policy Networks in British Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
MarshD. and SmithM. (2000) “Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach”, Political Studies, 48(1): 4–21.
27.
McCoolD. (1989) “Subgovernments and the Impact of Policy Fragmentation and Accommodation”, Policy Studies Review, 8(4): 264–287.
28.
MintromM. and VergariS. (1998) “Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms”, The Journal of Politics, 60(1): 126–148.
29.
National Association Of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (1977) Code of Ethics for Members. Adopted by the 89th NARUC Annual Convention. Available at www.naruc.org.
30.
O'BrienM. and PennaS. (1997) “European Policy and the Politics of Environmental Governance”, Policy and Politics, 25(2): 185–200.
31.
OlsonJ. (2006) “Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1): 1–24.
32.
PappiF. and HenningC. (1998) “Policy Networks: More than a Metaphor?”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4): 553–575.
33.
PetersonM. (1993) “Political Influence in the 1990s: From Iron Triangles to Policy Networks”, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 18(2): 395–438.
34.
RhodesR. (1996) “The New Governance: Governing without Government”, Political Studies, 44(4): 652–667.
35.
RipleyB. and FranklinG.A. (1980) Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy. Dorsey Press.
36.
RugglesC. (1937) Aspects of the Organization, Functions, and Finances of State Public Utility Commissions. Boston: Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, Bureau of Business Research.
37.
SlaughterA. and ZaringD. (2006) “Networking goes international: An update”, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 211–229.
38.
SlaughterA. (1997) “The real new world order”, Foreign Affairs76(5): 183–97.
39.
StiglerG.J. (1971) “The Theory of Economic Regulation”, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1): 3–21.
40.
TeodoroM. (2010) “Contingent Professionalism: Bureaucratic Mobility and the Adoption of Water Conservation Rates”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2): 437–459.
41.
VerdierP.H. (2009) “Transnational Regulatory Networks and Their Limits”, Yale Journal of International Law, 34(113): 113–172.
42.
WalkerJ. (1969) “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States”, The American Political Science Review, 63(3): 880–99.
