Due to its dynamic nature, and the increasing importance of competitive subparts, the telecommunications sector provides particularly interesting insights for studying regulatory unbundling. Based on the theory of monopolistic bottlenecks the fallacies of overregulation by undue unbundling obligations are indicated. Neither the promotion of infrastructure competition by mandatory unbundling of competitive subparts of telecommunications infrastructure, nor regulatory induced network fragmentation within monopolistic bottleneck components is justified. The impact of the shrinking of the areas of network specific market power on the remaining unbundling regulation is analyzed. Finally, the phasing-out potentials of unbundling regulation in European telecommunications markets are pointed out.
BaumolW.J.PanzarJ.C. and WilligR.D. (1982) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Javanovich.
3.
BeesleyM.E. and LittlechildS.C. (1989) “The regulation of privatized monopolies in the United Kingdom”, Rand Journal of Economics, 20(3): 454–472.
4.
BlankartCh.B.KniepsG. and ZenhäusernP. (2007) “Regulation of New Markets in Telecommunications: Market Dynamics and Shrinking Monopolistic Bottlenecks”, European Business Organization Law Review, 8: 413–428.
5.
CaveM. (2003) “The Economics of Wholesale Broadband Access”, MultiMedia und Recht (MMR), Beilage, 10: 15–19.
6.
CaveM. (2006) “Encouraging infrastructure competition via the ladder of investment”, Telecommunications Policy, 30: 223–237.
7.
CaveM. (2010) “Snakes and ladders: Unbundling in a next generation world”, Telecommunications Policy, 34: 80–85.
8.
CaveM. and ProsperettiL. (2001) “European Telecommunications Infrastructures”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17(3): 416–431.
9.
CaveM. and VogelsangI. (2003) “How Access Pricing and Entry Interact”, Telecommunications Policy, 27: 717–727.
10.
CoaseR.H. (1937) “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica: New Series, 4(16): 386–405.
11.
European Commission (2007) Commission Recommendation of 17 December 2007 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (2007/879/EC), OJ L: 344/65, 28.12.2007. Brussels: European Commission.
12.
European Commission (2010) Commission Recommendation of 20 September 2010 on regulated access to Next Generation Access Networks (NGA), OJ L: 251/35, 25.09.2010. Brussels: European Commission.
13.
FarellJ. (1997) Prospects for Deregulation in Telecommunications, Mildly Revised Version, May 30 1997, Professor of Economics UC Berkeley and Departing Chief Economist FCC, Speech May 9 1997 at FCC, retrieved September 12, 2011, from www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Speeches/jf050997.txt.
14.
HausmanJ.A. and SidakJ.G. (2005) “Did Mandatory Unbundling Achieve its Purpose? Empirical Evidence from Five Countries”, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 1(1): 173–245.
15.
KniepsG. (1997) “Phasing out Sector-Specific Regulation in Competitive Telecommunications”, Kyklos, 50(3): 325–339.
16.
KniepsG. (2005) “Telecommunications markets in the stranglehold of EU regulation: On the need for a disaggregated regulatory contract”, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 6(2): 75–93.
17.
KniepsG. (2006) “Sector-specific market power regulation versus general competition law: Criteria for judging competitive versus regulated markets”, In SioshansiF.P. and PfaffenbergerW. (eds), Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective. Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier, 49–74.
18.
KniepsG. and ZenhäusernP. (2007) “‘Stepping Stones’ and ‘Access Holidays’: The Fallacies of Regulatory Micro-Management”, In BaakeP. and BorckR. (eds), Public Economics and Public Choice: Contributions in Honour of Charles B. Blankart. Berlin et al.: Springer Verlag, 257–277.
19.
KniepsG. and ZenhäusernP. (2010) “Phasing out sector-specific regulation in European telecommunications”, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 6(4): 995–1006.
20.
WilliamsonO.E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies – Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York: The Free Press.
