This study applies a frontier benchmarking approach to measure economies of scope between the vertical stages of electricity supply in the U.S. electricity industry. By comparing different frontiers for integrated and separated supply of electricity based on a bootstrapping DEA, two types of vertical unbundling are analyzed. Separating the generation stage from networks and retail appears to be the more costly alternative with an average cost increase of 19 percent. Our second scenario, covering one of the options of transmission unbundling to be implemented in the European Union, shows an average cost increase below 2 percent.
AllazB. and VillaJ.-L. (1993) “Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency”, Journal of Economic Theory, 59: 1–16.
2.
ArocenaP. (2008) “Cost and Quality Gains from Diversification and Vertical Integration in the Electricity Industry: A DEA Approach”, Energy Economics, 30: 39–58.
3.
ArocenaP.SaalS. and CoelliT. (2009) Measuring Economies of Horizontal and Vertical Integration in the U.S. Electric Power Industry: How Costly is Unbundling?UK: Aston Business School. Working Paper RP 0917.
4.
BaldickR. and KahnE. (1993) “Network Costs and the Regulation of Wholesale Competition in Electric Power”, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 5: 367–384.
5.
BaumolW.PanzarJ.C. and WilligR.D. (1982) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Javanovich.
6.
BrunekreeftG.NeuhoffK. and NewberyD. (2005) “Electricity Transmission: An Overview of the Current Debate”, Utilities Policy, 13: 73–93.
7.
BrunekreeftG. and MeyerR. (2009) “Entflechtung auf den europäischen Strommärkten: Stand der Debatte”, In KniepsG. and WeißH.-J. (eds.), Fallstudien zur Netzökonomie. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
8.
ChaoH.OrenS. and WilsonR. (2005) Restructured Electricity Markets: Reevaluation of Vertical Integration and Unbundling. Palo Alto, California: EPRI. Technical paper.
9.
CoelliT.RaoD.S.P.O'DonnellC. J. and BatteseG.E. (2005) An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. New York: Springer Science & Business.
10.
CumminsJ.D.WeissM.A. and ZiH. (2003) Economies of Scope in Financial Services: A DEA Bootstrapping Analysis of the US Insurance Industry. Unpublished manuscript, Philadelphia, PA: The Wharton School.
11.
European Commission (1996) Directive 96/92/EC, 1996, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996, Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Electricity. Brussels: European Commission.
12.
European Commission (2003) Directive 2003/54/EC, 2003, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003, Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Electricity and Repealing Directive 96/92/EC. Brussels: European Commission.
13.
European Commission (2007) DG Competition Report on Energy Sector Inquiry. Brussels: European Commission.
14.
European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Electricity and Repealing Directive 2003/54/EC. Brussels: European Commission.
15.
EfronB. (1979) “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife”, Annals of Statistics, 7(1): 1–26.
16.
EhlersE. (2010) Electricity and Gas Supply Network Unbundling in Germany, Great Britain and the Netherlands and the Law of the European Union: A Comparison. Antwerp; Oxford; Portland: Intersentia.
17.
FäreR. (1986) “Addition and Efficiency”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51: 861–865.
18.
FraquelliG.PiacenzaM. and VannoniD. (2005) “Cost Savings From Generation and Distribution with an Application to Italian Electric Utilities”, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 28(3): 289–308.
19.
GrowitschC. and WetzelH. (2006) Economies of Scope in European Railways: An Efficiency Analysis. University of Lüneburg. Working Paper No. 29.
20.
GrosskopfS. and YaisawarngS. (1990) “Economies of Scope in the Provision of Local Public Services”, National Tax Journal, 43(1): 61–74.
21.
HartO. (1995) Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Clarendon Lectures in Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Jara-DíazS.Ramos-RealF.J. and Martínez-BudríaE. (2004) “Economies of Integration in the Spanish Electricity Industry Using a Multistage Cost Function”, Energy Economics, 26: 995–1013.
23.
JamasbT. and PollittM. (2001) “Benchmarking and Regulation: International Electricity Experience”, Utilities Policy, 9: 107–130.
24.
JamasbT. and PollittM. (2003) “International Benchmarking and Regulation: An Application to European Electricity Distribution Utilities”, Energy Policy, 31: 1609–1622.
25.
JoskowP. and SchmalenseeR. (1983). Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electric Utility Deregulation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
KasermanD. and MayoJ. (1991). “The Measurement of Vertical Economies and the Efficient Structure of the Electric Utility Industry”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(5): 483–502.
27.
KolbeL. and ReadJ. (1986) The Cost of Capital. Cambridge: MIT Press.
28.
KunnekeR. (2008) “Institutional Reform and Technological Practice: The Case of Electricity”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(2): 233–265.
29.
KünnekeR. and FensT. (2006) “Ownership Unbundling in Electricity Distribution: The Case of The Netherlands”, Energy Policy, 35(3): 1920–1930.
30.
KwokaJ.E. (2002) “Vertical Economies in Electric Power: Evidence on Integration and its Alternatives”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20: 653–671.
31.
LandonJ.H. (1983) “Theories of Vertical Integration and their Application to the Electric Utility Industry”, The Antitrust Bulletin, 28: 101–130.
32.
MeyerR. (2011a) Vertical Economies and the Costs of Separating Electricity Supply –A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Literature, Bremen Energy Working Paper No. 06, April 2011.
33.
MeyerR. (2011b) “Economies of Scope in Electricity Supply and the Cost of Vertical Separation for Different Unbundling Scenarios”, forthcoming in Journal of Regulatory Economics.
34.
NemotoJ. and GotoM. (2004) “Technological Externalities and Economies of Vertical Integration in the Electricity Supply Industry”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22: 67–81.
35.
NewberyD. and PollittM. (1997) “The Restructuring and Privatisation of Britain's CEGB – Was it Worth it?”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(3): 269–303.
36.
NillesenP. and PollittM. (2011) “Ownership Unbundling in Electricity Distribution: Empirical Evidence from New Zealand”, Review of Industrial Organization, 38(1): 61–93.
37.
ShephardR.W. (1970) Theory of Cost and Production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38.
SimarL. and WilsonP.W. (1998) “Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models”, Management Science44(1): 49–61.
39.
SimarL. and WilsonP.W. (2000) “Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art”, Journal of Productivity Analysis13(1): 49–78.
40.
WillemsB. (2005) Cournot Competition, Financial Option Markets and Efficiency. University of California Energy Institute. CSEM Working Paper 139.
41.
WilliamsonO. (1971) “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations”, American Economic Review, 61: 112.127.
42.
WilliamsonO. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies; Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.
43.
WilliamsonO. (1979) “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations”, Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233–261.
44.
WilsonP.W. (1993) “Detecting Outliers in Deterministic Nonparametric Frontier Models with Multiple Outputs”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11: 319–323.
45.
WilsonP.W. (2005) Fear 1.0: A Software Package for Frontier Efficiency Analysis with R. Austin, Texas: University of Texas. Department of Economics, Unpublished working paper.
