Traditionally, universal services in network industries have relied on granting the universal service provider a reserved area. Current liberalization policies promoting competitive entry may put the traditional universal service and its financing at risk. Hence, there is an increased interest in estimating the cost of universal service provision.
In the postal sector, the Third EC Directive proposes a calculation approach to determine the net cost of a universal service obligation and to compensate the universal service provider (USP). In this paper, we discuss various implementations of the costing and financing of USO based on profitability cost and argue that a holistic approach is appropriate to meet the core requirements of consistency and robustness.
BergumK. (2008) “Calculating the Net Cost of the USO: A Practical Example from Norway”, In CrewM.A.KleindorferP.R. and CampbellJ.I. (eds), Handbook of Worldwide Postal Reform. Edward Elgar.
2.
BoldronF.BorsenbergerC.JoramD.LecouS. and RoyB. (2009) “A Dynamic and Endogenous Approach for Financing USO in a Liberalized Environment”, In CrewM. A. and KleindorferP. R. (eds), Progress in the Competitive Agenda in the Postal and Delivery Sector. Edward Elgar.
3.
BorsenbergerC.CremerH.De DonderP.JoramD. and RoyB. (2010) “Funding the cost of universal service in a liberalized postal sector”, In CrewM. A. and KleindorferP. R. (eds), Heightening Competition in the Postal and Delivery Sector. Edward Elgar.
4.
Cerp (2008) Guidelines for Calculating the Net Cost of the Universal Service Obligations.
5.
CohenR., and McBrideC. (2008) “Estimates of the Current Costs of the USO in the U.S”, Appendix F Section 3 of Study on universal postal service and the postal monopoly.George Mason University.
6.
CohenR.McBrideC. and PanzarJ. C., (2010) “The Cost of the USO in the United States”, In CrewM.A. and KleindorferP.R. (eds), Heightening Competition in the Postal and Delivery Sector. Edward Elgar.
7.
Copenhagen Economics (2008) What is the Cost of Post Danmark's Universal Service Obligation?Study on behalf of the Danish Chamber of Commerce.
8.
CremerH.GasmiF.GrimaudA. and LaffontJ. (1998) The Economics of Universal Service: Practice. The Economic Development Institute of the World Bank.
9.
CremerH.GrimaudA. and LaffontJ. (2000) “The Cost of Universal Service in the Postal Sector”, In CrewM. A. and KleindorferP. R. (eds), Current Directions in Postal Reform. Kluwer.
10.
CrewM.A. and KleindorferP.R. (1998) “Efficient Entry, Monopoly and the Universal Service Obligation in Postal Service”, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 14(2): 103–125.
11.
De DonderP. (2006) “Access Pricing in the Postal Sector: Theory and Simulations”, Review of Industrial Organization, 28(3): 307–326.
12.
De DonderP.CremerH.DudleyP. and RodriguezF. (2010) “Welfare and Profit Implications for Changes in Service Specification within the Universal Service”, In CrewM.A. and KleindorferP.R. (eds), Heightening Competition in the Postal and Delivery Sector. Edward Elgar.
13.
DiekeA. and NiederpruemA. (2008) “Efforts to calculate the cost of the USO and the value of the postal monopoly in the US and abroad”. Appendix F Section 3 of Study on universal postal service and the postal monopoly.George Mason University.
14.
DietlH.JaagC.LangM. and TrinknerU. (2011) “Competition and Welfare Effects of VAT Exemptions”, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11(1): Article 19.
15.
Frontier Economics (2008) Net Costs of Elements of the Universal Service. Report prepared for Postcomm.
16.
GautierA. and PaoliniD. (2010). “Universal service financing in competitive postal markets: One size does not fit all”. Paper presented at the sixth conference on Regulation, Competition and Universal Service in the Postal Sector, Toulouse.
17.
George Mason University School of Public Policy (2008) Study on Universal Postal Service and the Postal Monopoly. George Mason University.
18.
JaagC. (2010) Compensating the Net Cost of Universal Postal Services. Zurich: Swiss Economics. Working Paper 17.
19.
JaagC. (2011) “Entry Deterrence and the Calculation of the Net Cost of Universal Service Obligations”, Review of Network Economics, 10(1): Article 4.
20.
JaagC.KollerM. and TrinknerU. (2009) “Calculating the Cost of the Universal Service Obligation: The Need for a Global Approach”, In CrewM.A. and KleindorferP.R. (eds), Progress in the competitive agenda in the postal and delivery sector. Edward Elgar.
21.
JaagC. and TrinknerU. (2011) “The interaction of universal service costing and financing in the postal sector: A calibrated approach”, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 39(1): 89–110.
22.
PanzarJ. (2000) “A Methodology for Measuring the Costs of Universal Service Obligations”, Information Economics and Policy, 12(3): 211–220.
23.
Oftel (2000) Review of universal telecommunication services. A consultative document issued by the Director General of Telecommunications.
24.
RoyB. (2010) USO Net Cost in the postal sector: Where do we stand? – Economic theory and practical implementation. Presentation at the 12th Königswinter Seminar on Postal Economics.
25.
SparasD. (2008) The 3rd Postal Directive – establishment of an internal postal market. Presentation by the Director General Internal Market and Services – Postal Services Unit, Brussels.
26.
WesethT. (2010) Posten Norge AS: Calculation and compensation of USO net costs in Norway. Presentation at the 12th Königswinter Seminar on Postal Economics.
