What are the trends in the design of regulatory agencies' scope of responsibilities? To shed some light on this issue, we explore temporal, sectoral, national and regional variations in the scope of agencies across 16 different policy domains and 48 countries. This exercise represents a first step towards a theoretically driven empirical explanation of the determinants of agency scope. Focusing on the distinction between single- and multi-sector agencies, we demonstrate how agency scope is contingent on national, sectoral and regional characteristics, and provide a preliminary analysis of the characteristics of these variations. Our analysis of the data demonstrates, first, that the scope of agencies has been expanding fast since the late 1990s, often as a result of the extension of regulatory agencification to new sectors, and second, that multi-sectoral agencies are more common in Europe than in Latin America, in economic regulation than in social regulation, and in smaller countries than in bigger ones.
AbramsRichard and TaylorMichael W. (2003) “Issues in the Unification of Financial Sector Supervision”, in EnochCharlesMarstonDavid, and TaylorMichael W. (eds.), Building Strong Banks Through Surveillance and Resolution. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
2.
BraithwaiteJ. (2000) “The New Regulatory State and the Transformation of Criminology”, British Journal of Criminology, 40: 222–38.
3.
BriaultClive (1999) The Rationale For a Single National Financial Services Regulator, Occasional Papers no. 2. London: Financial Services Authority.
4.
ChristensenJørgen Grønnegaard (2001) “Bureaucratic Autonomy as a Political Asset”, in PetersGuy B. & PierreJon (eds.), Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London: Routledge.
5.
ChristensenTom and LægreidPer, (eds.) (2006) Autonomy and Regulation –Coping with Agencies in the Modern State. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
6.
CihákMartin and PodpieraRichard (2007) “Experience with Integrated Supervisors: Governance and Quality of Supervision”, in MasciandaroDonato and QuintynMarc (eds.), Designing Financial Supervision Institutions: Independence, Accountability and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
7.
CopelovitchMark S. and SingerDavid Andrew (2008) “Financial Regulation, Monetary Policy, and Inflation in the Industrialized World”, Journal of Politics, 70(3): 663–80.
8.
DunleavyPaul (1989) “The Architecture of the British Central State, Part I: Framework for Analysis”, Public Administration, 67(3): 249–75.
9.
FreytagAndreas and MasciandaroDonato (2007) “Financial Supervision Architecture and Central bank Independence”, in MasciandaroDonato and QuintynMarc (eds.), Designing Financial Supervision Institutions. Independence, Accountability and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
10.
GilardiFabrizio (2005) “The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe”, Annals of the American Academy of Social and Political Sciences, 598(1): 84–101.
11.
HentenAndersSamarajivaRohan and MelodyWilliam (2003) “Designing Next Generation Telecom Regulation: ICT Convergence or Multi-sector Utility?”, INFO, 5(1): 26–33.
12.
HerringRichard and CarmassiJacopo (2008) “The Structure of Cross-Sector Financial Supervision”, Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 17(1): 51–76.
13.
JordanaJacintLevi-FaurDavid and FernàndezXavier (2011) “The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Agencies: Channels of Transfer and Stages of Diffusion”, Comparative Political Studies, forthcoming.
14.
JordanaJacint and Levi-FaurDavid (2006) “Towards a Latin American Regulatory State? The Diffusion of Autonomous Regulatory Agencies across Countries and Sectors”, International Journal of Public Administration, 29(4–6): 1–32.
15.
Levi-FaurDavid (2010) Europeanization and Regulatory Agencification: Toward a Single European Regulatory Space. Paper presented at the Agency Governance in the EU and its Consequences' (RECON/MZES), University of Mannheim, Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES), 16–17 September.
16.
Levi-FaurDavid and GiladSharon (2004) “The Rise of the British Regulatory State: Transcending the Privatization Debate”Comparative Politics, 37(1): 105–24.
17.
LützSusanne (2004) “Convergence within National Diversity: A Comparative Perspective on the Regulatory in Finance”, Journal of Public Policy, 24(2): 169–97.
18.
MajoneGiandomenico (1997) “From the Positive to the Regulatory State”, Journal of Public Policy, 17(2): 139–67.
19.
MalericCedo (2004) “Developments in Organizational Structures of Banking and Financial market Supervision”, Croatian National Bank, PPT Presentation, Group of Banking Supervisors from Central and Eastern Europe, Annual Conference (www.hnb.hr/dub-konf/fsi-bscee-2004/radovi) [Accessed 21-10-2008].
20.
MasciandaroDonato (2006) “E Pluribus Unum? Authorities' Design in Financial Supervision: Trends and Determinants”, Open Economies Review, 17(1): 73–102.
21.
MasciandaroDonato and QuintynMarc (2009) After the Big Bang and Before the Next One? Reforming the Financial Supervision Architecture and the Role of the Central Bank. A Review of Worldwide Trends, Causes and Effects (1998–2008), Paolo Baffi Centre Research Paper Series No. 2009-37. Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.
22.
MasciandroDonatoQuintynMarc and TaylorMichael W. (2008) “Inside and Outside the Central Bank: Independence and Accountability in Financial Supervision: Trends and Determinants”, European Journal of Political Economy, 24(4): 833–48.
23.
PetersB. Guy & PierreJon, (eds) (2001) Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London: Routledge.
24.
PollittCh.TalbotC.CaulfieldJ. and SmullenA. (2004) Agencies: How Governments Do Things through Semi-autonomous Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.
25.
RhodesR.A.W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability. London: Open University Press.
26.
SamarajivaRohanMahanAmy and BarendseAndrew (2002) Multisector Utility Regulation, Discussion Paper No. 0203. World Dialogue on Regulation for Network Economies (WDR).
27.
SchwartzTim and SatolaDavid (2000) Telecommunications Legislation in Transitional and Developing Economies, World Bank Technical Paper No. 489. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
28.
ThatcherMark and CoenDavid (2008) “Reshaping European Regulatory Space: An Evolutionary Analysis”, West European Politics, 31(4): 806–36.
