The voluntary benchmarking system of the Dutch drinking water sector has matured over time. Nowadays it is Europe's most veteran benchmarking scheme of drinking water companies. The system has been praised by many; although also critical notes are heard on whether the system is still as appropriate and effective as it once was. The recent legislative change from a voluntary to a mandatory system provides an opportunity for reflection and change. This paper assesses the lessons learnt from the existing system through an analysis of stakeholder views, in order to identify ways for enhancement.
AntonioliB. and FilippiniM. (2001) “The use of a variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry”, Utilities Policy, 10 (3–4): 181–187.
3.
BloklandM.BraadbaartO.D., and SchwartzK. (1999) Private Business, public owners. Government shareholdings in water enterprises. The Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning, and the Environment. The Netherlands.
4.
BowermanM.FrancisG.BallA. and FryJ. (2002) “The evolution of benchmarking in UK local authorities”, Benchmarking, 9(5): 321–329.
5.
BraadbaartO.D.BloklandM. and HoogwoutB. (1999) “Evolving Market Surrogates in the Dutch Water Supply Industry: Investments, Finance, and Industry Performance Comparisons”, In BloklandM.BraadbaartO., and SchwartzK. (eds) Private Business, public owners. Government shareholdings in water enterprises. The Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning, and the Environment. The Netherlands.
6.
BraadbaartO.D. (2007) “Collaborative benchmarking, transparency and performance. Evidence from the Netherlands water supply industry”, Benchmarking, 14(6): 677–692.
7.
CabreraE.Jr. (2008) “Benchmarking in the water industry: A mature practice?”, Water Utility Management International, 3(2): 5–7.
8.
CortonM.L. (2003) “Benchmarking in the Latin American water sector: The case of Peru”, Utilities Policy, 11(3): 133–142.
9.
CPB (2000) Yardstick competition. Theory, Design and Practice. Working Paper No. 133. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Analysis, The Hague.
10.
CramerJ. (2007) Toespraak van minister Jacqueline Cramer op de bijeenkomst van de International Water Association op 3 oktober 2007 in Amsterdam. Ministerie van Volkhuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Accessed on 28 September 2009 at www.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=34253.
11.
DasslerT.ParkerD. and SaalD.S. (2006) “Methods and trends of performance benchmarking in UK utility regulation”, Utilities Policy, 14(3): 166–174.
12.
De WitteK. (2007) “Vewin versus Dijkgraaf. Het beste van twee werelden”, Helder, 2(7): 7–8.
13.
De WitteK. and DijkgraafE. (2008) Fusies versus benchmark in de drinkwatersector. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 11 January.
14.
De WitteK. and MarquesR.C. (2007) Regulering brengt efficiëntie in de drinkwatersector. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 23 maart 2007.
15.
De WitteK. and MarquesR.C. (2009) Gaming in a Benchmarking Environment. A non-parametric analysis of benchmarking in the water sector. MPRA Paper No. 14579. April 2009.
16.
DijkgraafE. (2002) Fusies saboteren eerlijke prijzen op drinkwatermarkt. Het Financieele Dagblad, 2 July.
17.
DijkgraafE. and van de MortelE.G. (1997) Marktwerking monopolisten in de watersector missen node controle. Het Financieele Dagblad, 9 September.
18.
DijkgraafE.Van der GeestS.A. and VarkevisserM. (2005) Efficiëntie boven water. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 28 January.
FedorD.B.ParsonsC.K. and ShalleyC.E. (1996) “Organizational Comparison Processes: Investigating the Adoption and Impact of Benchmarking-Related Activities”, Journal of Quality Management, 1(2): 161–192.
21.
FolzD.H. (2004) “Service Quality and Benchmarking the Performance of Municipal Services”, Public Administration Review, 64(2): 209–220.
22.
HallD.LobinaE.CorralV.HoedemanO.TerhorstP.PigeonM. and KishimotoS. (2009) Public-public partnerships (PUPs) in water. PSIRU, Accessed on 28 September 2009 at www.psiru.org.
23.
Helder (2007) “Een benchmark van de benchmark”, Helder, 2(7): December.
24.
JamasbT. and PollittM. (2001) “Benchmarking and regulation: International electricity experience”, Utilities Policy, 9(3): 107–130.
25.
KaplanR.S. and NortonD.P. (2005) “The balanced score card: Measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, July-August.
26.
LinC. (2005) “Service quality and prospects for benchmarking: Evidence from the Peru water sector”, Utilities Policy, 13(3): 230–239.
27.
LoveR.BunnyH.S.SmithM. and DaleB.G. (1998) “Benchmarking in water supply services: The lessons learnt”, Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, 5(1): 59–70.
28.
NemecJ.MerickovaB. and OchranaF. (2008) “Introducing benchmarking in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Processes, problems and lessons”, Public Management Review, 10(5): 673–684.
29.
PerdokP.J. and WesselJ. (1998) “The Netherlands”, In CorreiaF. N. (ed) Institutions for water resources management in Europe.
30.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2008) Eerst water, de prijs komt later?, PWC.
31.
RohflerS. (2004) “Benchmarking concepts in the UK and Germany: A shared understanding among key players?”, Benchmarking, 11(5): 521–539.
32.
SchmitzT, and DaneP. (2008) “A sharp improvement in the efficiency of Dutch water utilities: Benchmarking of water supply in the Netherlands, 1997–2007”, Water Utility Management, 3(2): 17–19.
33.
SchwartzK. and van DijkM.P. (2005) “New Public Management en de Nederlandse Drinkwatersecto”, Economenblad, 28(2).
34.
Van DammeE.E.C. and MulderK.J. (2006) Transparant en eerlijk geprijsd water. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 24 maart.
35.
Van GeelP.L.B.A. (2009) Memorie van Toelichting: Nieuwe bepalingen met betrekking to the productie en distributie van drinkwater en de organisatie van de openbare drinkwatervoorziening (Drinkwaterwet). Ministry of VROM. No. 30895.
36.
Van HeldenG.J. and TillemaS. (2005) “In search of a benchmarking theory for the public sector”, Financial Accountability & Management, 21(3); 337–361.
37.
Vewin (2007) Reflections on performance 2006. Vewin and Accenture.
Vos de WaelA. (2006) “Sturen op kosten alleen riskant”, H2O, 3/2006.
41.
WalterM.CullmannA.Von HirschhausenC.WandR. and ZschilleM. (2009) “Quo Vadis Efficiency Analysis of Water Distribution? A comparative literature review”, Utilities Policy17(3–4): 225–232.
