This paper provides an analysis of the possible relationships between the competition authority and sectoral regulators. The relevant literature is first discussed and then applied to the Belgian situation. As in so many other countries, Belgium is going through a difficult search process to find the appropriate relationship. Nevertheless, we might be able to take a relatively unique direction in the future. It is not unimaginable that a constellation is developing which will put the competition authority on a higher hierarchical level than the sector regulators, by installing it as the body of appeal for the decisions of the sector regulators.
BouckaertJ. (2002) “Marktwerking in de diensten; nood aan een aangepaste regelgeving en mededingingsbeleid”, in PeetersL.MatthyssensP. and VereeckL. (eds), Stakeholder synergie, 25e Vlaams Wetenschappelijk Economisch Congres. Leuven: Garant Uitgevers n.v., p. 475–506.
2.
de StreelA. (2008) “The relationship between Competition Policy and Sector Specific Regulation: The Case of Telecommunications”, Reflets & Perspectives de la Vie Economique, Tome XLVII, p. 55–72.
3.
DevroeW. (2007) “De verhouding tussen mededingingsautoriteiten en sectoriële toezichthouders in België”, in StuyckJ.DevroeW. and WytinckP. (eds), De nieuwe Belgische mededingingswet 2006. Leuven: Kluwer.
4.
DuijmB. (2004) “On the institutional setting of ex-post regulation in regulated industries”, in ForsythP.GillenD.W.KnorrA.MayerO. G.NiemeierH. and StarkieD., The Economic Regulation of Airports. Recent Developments in Australasia, North America and Europe, Ashgate.
5.
GarzanitiL. (2004) Telecommunications, broadcasting and the internet. EU competition law & regulation. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2nd edition.
6.
GeradinD. and LaroucheP. (2004) L'application decentralisé du droit de la concurrence dans les secteurs liberalisés – l'exemple du secteur des communications électroniques, paper presented at the Colloquium ‘Décentralisation dans l'application du droit de la concurrence, Un rôle accru pour le praticien?’, Université Louvain-la-Neuve, February 20th, 2004.
7.
GeradinD and O'DonoghueR. (2005) The concurrent application of competition law and regulation: The case of margin squeeze abuses in the telecommunications sector, The Global Competition Law Centre Working Papers Series, GCLC Working Paper 04/05.
8.
GusbinD. (2003) Network industries in Belgium. Economic significance and reform, Federal Planning Bureau, Working Paper 1–03.
9.
International Competition Network (2005), Antitrust Enforcement in Regulated Sectors Working Group, Subgroup 2: Interrelations between antitrust and regulatory authorities, Report to the Fourth ICN Annual Conference, Bonn.
10.
KoningsJ.Van CayseeleP. and WarzynskiF. (2001) “The dynamics of industrial mark-ups in two small open economies: Does national competition policy matter?”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 841–859.
11.
LafontJ.J. and TiroleJ. (2001), Competition in Telecommunication. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
12.
LaroucheP. (2000), Competition Law and Regulation in European Telecommunications. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
13.
LaroucheP. (2004), “Legal issues concerning remedies in network industries”, in GeradinD. (ed.), Remedies in network industries: EC competition law vs. sector-specific regulation. Antwerpen: Intersentia.
14.
MontangieY. (2004), “The Application of EU Competition Law by the Belgian Competition Authorities and Judges: Is Belgium Prepared for the ‘New Regime’?”The Competition Law Review, Volume 1, Issue 1, August 2004, pp 41–59.
15.
NaertF. (2008), “Une évaluation politico-économique de la politique beige de concurrence”, Reflets & Perspectives de la Vie Economique, Tome XLVII, p. 73–88.
16.
OECD (1999), Relationship between regulators and competition authorities, DAFFE/CLP(99)8.
17.
OECD (2002), Restructuring Public Utilities for Competition, Policy Brief.
18.
OECD (2005), The relationship between competition authorities and sectoral regulators, DAF/COMP/GF(2005)2.
19.
PetitN. (2004), The Proliferation of National Regulatory Authorities alongside Competition Authorities: A Source of Jurisdictional Confusion, The Global Competition Law Centre Working Papers Series, GCLC Working Paper 02/04.
20.
VerhoestK.PetersG.BeuselinckE.MeyersF. & BouckaertG. (2005), How coordination and control of public organizations by government interrelate: An analytical and empirical exploration, SCANCOR/SOG. Stanford University.
