AmundsenEirik S. and BergmanLars, 2002, “Will Cross-Ownership Re-Establish Market Power in the Nordic Power Market?”, The Energy Journal23(2): 73–95.
2.
AnderssonB. and LarsBergman, 1995, “Market Structure and the Price of Electricity: An Ex Ante Analysis of the Deregulated Swedish Electricity Market”, The Energy Journal16(2): 97–109.
3.
BergmanLars and AnderssonBo, 1994. Market Structure and the Price of Electricity. Stockholm School of Economics.
4.
BergmanLars, 2002. “The Nordic Electricity Market – Continued Success or Emerging Problems?”, Swedish Economic Policy Review9: 51–88.
5.
BergmanLars, 2003, “European Electricity Market Integration: The Nordic Experiences”Symposium European Electricity Markets, The Hague, September 2003.
6.
BidwellMiles and HenneyAlex, 2004. “Will the New Electricity Trading Arrangements Ensure Generating Adequacy?”The Electricity Journal17(7):15–38. August/September.
7.
BlackBernard and PierceRichard, 1993, “The Choice Between Markets and Central Planning in Regulating the U.S. Electricity Industry”Columbia Law Review93(6): 1339–1441.
8.
BorensteinSeverin, 2000, “Understanding Competitive Pricing and Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets”Electricity Journal13(6): 49–57.
9.
BorensteinSeverin, 2002, “The Trouble with Electricity Markets: Understanding California's Restructuring Disaster”, Journal of Economic Perspectives16(1): 191–211.
10.
BorensteinSeverin and BushnellJames, 1999, “An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Market Power in California's Electricity Market”, Journal of Industrial Economics47(3): 285–323.
11.
BoucherJ. and SmeersY., 2003. The European Regulation on Cross Border Trade: Can One Do Without a Standard Market Design?Harvard Electricity Policy Group. Brussels. March.
12.
BoyerMarcel, (2005, March 16). “Raise Electricity Prices in Quebec – and Benefit Everyone,”E-Brief, C.D. Howe Institute, Toronto.
13.
BowringJoseph, 2006, “The PJM Market” in SioshansiFereidoon P. and PfaffenbergerWolfgang, eds., 2006. Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective (Elsevier, Ltd, Kidlington, UK).
14.
BrownAshley C., 2003. “Vision Without Site; Site Without Vision.”The Electricity Journal16(8): 23–34. October.
15.
BurletonDerek and KalevarPriscila, 2005. TD Economics Special Report, Electricity in Canada – Who Needs It? Who's Got It?TD Bank Financial Group, March 2005.
16.
ByeTorstein and HopeEinar, 2005, “Deregulation of Electricity Markets – The Norwegian Experience”, Discussion Papers No. 433 (September 2005), Statistics Norway, Research Department
17.
ByeTorstein, 2003, “A Nordic Energy Market Under Stress”, Economic Survey, No. 4, pp. 26–37
18.
ClarkC. Robert and LeachAndrew, 2007, “The Potential for Electricity Market Restructuring in Quebec”, Canadian Public Policy, 33(1)
19.
CohenMarjorie Griffin2003, “High Tension: B.C. Hydro's Deep Integration with the U.S. through RTO West”, BC Citizens for Public Power, March 2003.
20.
CohenMarjorie Griffin2002, “From Public Good to Private Exploitation: Electricity Deregulation, Privatization and Continental Integration”, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, July 2002.
21.
Commission of the European Communities, 2005, Annual Report on the Implementation of the Gas and Electricity Internal Market, January 5, 2005.
22.
Commission of the European Communities, 2004. Third Benchmarking Report on the Implementation of the Internal Electricity and Gas Market. Brussels. January.
23.
Commonwealth of Australia, 2002, “Towards a Truly National and Efficient Energy Market”, Final Report of the Council of Australian Governments' Independent Review of Energy Market Directions.
24.
Commonwealth of Australia, 2004, “Energy in Australia 2004”, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources.
25.
DanielsRonald and TrebilcockMichael, 1996, “The Future of Ontario Hydro: A Review of Structural and Regulatory Options,” in Daniels (ed.), Ontario Hydro at the Millennium, The University of Toronto Press.
26.
de VriesL.J. and HakvoortR.A.2004, “The Question of Generation Adequacy in Liberalised Electricity Markets”, Working Paper.
27.
DimasiJoe, 2004, 18–19 November. “Transmission Network Investment”, Speech to International Energy Agency – OECD Paris.
28.
DuncanDwight, 2004, “Notes for remarks by The Honourable Dwight Duncan, Minister of Energy, to the Public Policy Forum on Energy”, November 29, 2004.
29.
FaruquiAhmad and GeorgeStephen S., 2005. “Preventing Electrical Shocks: What Ontario and Other Provinces Should Learn About Smart Metering,”CD. Howe Institute, Toronto, Commentary No. 210.
30.
GiesbertzPaul and TonjesChristoph, 2004. Integration of Markets: Benefits, Preconditions, and Impediments. CIEP Electricity Market Seminar. The Hague. February.
31.
GreenRichard and NewberyDavid, 1992. “Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market.”Journal of Political Economy100: 929–950.
32.
HaasReinhard, 2006, “Competition in the Continental European Electricity Market: Despair or Work in Progress?” in SioshansiFereidoon P. and PfaffenbergerWolfgang, eds., 2006. Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective (Elsevier, Ltd, Kidlington, UK).
33.
HenneyAlex and RussellTim, 2002. Lessons From the Institutional Framework of Transmission System Operation, and Energy Markets in Most West European Countries and Some Other Countries – The Case for Transcos. EEE Limited. London.
34.
HenneyAlex, 2002, “What the U.S. Could Learn from Western Europe and Elsewhere”, The Electricity Journal15(10): 53–64. December.
35.
HirstEric, 2004. U.S. Transmission Capacity: Present Status and Future Prospects. Edison Electric Institute. Washington. June.
36.
HuntGary, 2005, Wholesale Competition: The Big-Bang Effect, Public Utilities Fortnightly, September 2005, 10–15.
37.
HuXinminGrozevGeorge and BattenDavid, 2005, “Empirical observations of bidding patterns in Australia's National Electricity Market”, Energy Policy33: 2075–2086.
38.
OneHydro, 2004. Transmission Solutions: 10 Year Transmission Plan for the Province of Ontario 2005–2014.
39.
IMO, (2004a). An Assessment of the Adequacy of Generation and Transmission Facilities to Meet Future Electricity Needs in Ontario 2005–2014.
40.
IMO, (2004b). Ontario Transmission System. International Energy Agency, 2001, Energy Policies of IEA Countries – Australia 2001 Review.
41.
JoskowPaul L. and KahnEdward, 2001. A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California's Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000. University of California Energy Institute. January.
42.
JoskowPaul L., 2003. The Difficult Transition to Competitive Markets in the U.S.AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. Related Publication 03–13. Washington. July.
43.
JoskowPaul and TiroleJean, 2003, “Merchant Transmission Investment” Working Paper (February 10, 2003).
44.
JoskowPaul L., 2004. Transmission Policy in the United States. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. Related Publication 04–26. Washington. October.
45.
KrapelsEdward N., 2003. Goodbye Gridlock: How to End the Shortage in Transmission Investment that Led to the Northeast Blackout. Energy Security Analysis, Inc.Wakefield, MA.
46.
LECG, 2001, Feasibility Study for Combined Day Ahead Electricity Market in the Northeast.
47.
MoranAlan, 2006, “The Electricity Market in Australia: Problems Along the Way to a National Electricity Market” in SioshansiFereidoon P. and PfaffenbergerWolfgang, eds., 2006. Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective (Elsevier, Ltd, Kidlington, UK).
48.
MountainBruce and SweierGeoff, 2003, “Entrepreneurial Interconnectors and Transmission Planning in Australia”, The Electricity Journal, March: 66–76
49.
Navigant Consulting Ltd., 2003. Regional Electricity Transmission Grid Study, presented to The Federal-Provincial-Territorial Electricity Transmission Working Group.
50.
NECA, 2004, Annual Report – 2003–2004.
51.
NewberyDavid M., 1995, “Power Markets and Market Power”, Energy Journal16(3): 39–66.
52.
NewberyDavid, 2002, “Mitigating Market Power in Electricity Markets”, Paper prepared for the conference Towards a European Market of Electricity: What Have We Learnt from Recent Lessons'? Spot Market Design, Derivatives and Regulation, SSPA Italian Advanced School of Public Administration on June 24–5, 2002.
53.
Nordel, 2005, Enhancing Efficient Functioning of the Nordic Electricity Market: Summary and Conclusions, 24 February 2005.
54.
Ontario Energy Board, 2005a, January 26. Press Release.
55.
Ontario Energy Board, 2005b. Smart Meter Implementation Plan, Report to Minister of Energy.
56.
Ontario Energy Board, 2005c, March 11. Press Release.
57.
Ontario Energy Board, 2005d. Regulated Price Plan.
58.
Perez-ArriagaIgnacio and OlmosLuis, 2004. A Plausible Congestion Market Scheme for the Internal Electricity Market of the European Union. Instituto de Investigacion Tecnologia, Universidad Pontificia Comillas. Working Paper IIT, Ref Number: IIT-03-037A. March.
59.
PierceRichard J., 2002. “How Will the California Energy Debacle Affect Energy Deregulation?”Administrative Law Review54(1): 389–408. Winter.
60.
PierceRichard J., 2005a. “Realizing the Promise of Electric Power Deregulation.”Wake Forest Law Review20: 451.
61.
PierceRichard J., 2005b. “Environmental Regulation, Energy, and Market Entry.”Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum145: 164.
62.
PineauP.-O.HiraA. and FroschauerK., 2004, “Measuring International Electricity Integration: A Comparative Study of the Power Systems under the Nordic Council, MERCOSUR, and NAFTA”Energy Policy, vol. 32 (13) 1457–1475.
63.
RobertsSebastian, 2003, 22–23 September. “Electricity Markets in Australia”, Presentation to Conference on Coal and Electricity in India.
64.
RosenzweigMichael B.FraserHamishFalkJonathon and VollSarah, 2003. “Market Power and Demand Responsiveness: Letting Customers Protect Themselves”, The Electricity Journal16(4):11–23. May.
65.
RuffLarry E.2003. The Ontario Experience and the Future of Competition in Electricity. Harvard Electricity Policy Group. Palm Springs. January.
66.
SioshansiFereidoon P. and PfaffenbergerWolfgang, eds., 2006. Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective (Elsevier, Ltd, Kidlington, UK).
67.
StoftSteven, “Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity”, (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002).
68.
SweeneyJames L., 2002. The California Electricity Crisis. Hoover Institution. Palo Alto.
69.
The Economist, 2004. “Europe's Power Struggle.”The Economist, July 3, 200449–50.
70.
TrebilcockMichael, 2004, “The Great Efficiencies Debate in Canadian Merger Policy”, New Zealand Business Law Quarterly, 10(4): 298–325.
71.
TrebilcockMichael and HowseRobert, 2005, The Regulation of International Trade, (London: Routledge, 2005, 3rd ed.).
72.
TrebilcockMichael J. and HrabRoy, 2005, “Electricity Restructuring in Ontario”, The Energy Journal26(1): 123–146.
73.
TrebilcockMichael J. and DanielsRon, 2000, “Electricity Restructuring: The Ontario Experience”Canadian Business Law Journal33(2): 161–192.
74.
von der FehrNils-Henrik M., 2002, “Comment on Lars Bergman: The Nordic electricity Market – Continued Success or Emerging Problems?”, Swedish Economic Policy Review9: 89–92.
75.
von der FehrNils-Henrik M.AmundsenEirik S. and BergmanLars, 2004, “The Nordic Market: Signs of Stress?”University of Bergen, Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 15/04.
76.
WolframCatherine D., 1999, “Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market”, American Economic Review89(4): 805–826.
77.
WoolfFiona, 2003. A Single Electricity Market in Europe – or Fifteen?CMS Cameron McKenna. London.