This article describes the fundamental changes in the securities trading landscape in Europe and the U.S. Three trends during the last decade change the business model of securities trading profoundly, being demutualisation, consolidation and technological evolution. The emergence of Alternative Trading Systems put considerable pressure on traditional stock exchanges and raises questions about the appropriate level of regulation and the level-playing field among all actors in the securities trading business.
AggarwalR. (2002), “Demutualization and Corporate Governance of Stock Exchanges”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, vol. 15.
2.
AggarwalR.DahiyaS. (2005), “Demutualization and Public Offerings of Financial Exchanges”, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=859305.
3.
ArnoldT.HerschP.MulherinJ.H.NetterJ. (1999), “Merging Markets”, Journal of Finance, vol. 54, 1083–1107.
4.
BradleyC. (2001), “Demutualization of Financial Exchanges: Business as Usual?”Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, vol. 21, no. 3, 657–702.
5.
CaseyJ.P.LannooK. (2006), “The MiFID Implementing Measures: Excessive Detail or Level Playing Field?”ECMI Policy Brief, no.l, European Capital Markets Institute, Brussels.
6.
DegryseH.Van AchterM. (2003), “Alternative Trading Systems and Liquidity”, in BallingM. (eds.), Technology and Finance: Challenges for Financial Markets, Business Strategies and Policymakers, Routledge, 171–189.
7.
EngelenP.J. (2004), “Criminal Behavior: A Real Option Approach. With an Application to Restricting Illegal Insider Trading”, European Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 17, no. 3, 329–352.
8.
EngelenP.J. (2006), “Difficulties in the Criminal Prosecution of Insider Trading – A Clinical Study of the Bekaert Case”, European Journal of Law and Economics, 121–141.
9.
EngelenP.J.KabirR. (2006), “Empirical Evidence on the Role of Trading Suspensions in Disseminating New Information to the Capital Market”, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, vol. 33, 1142–1167.
10.
KorhonenK. (2001), “Securities Market ATSs Concepts, Their Roles and Related Policy Issues”, Bank of Finland Discussion Papers, no. 24, 1–71.
11.
MaceyJ.O'HaraM. (1999), “Globalization, Exchange Governance, and the Future of Exchanges”, in LitanR.SantomeroM. (eds.), Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, Brookings Institution Press.
12.
MaceyJ.O'HaraM. (1999), “Regulating Exchanges and Alternative Trading Systems: A Law and Economics Perspective”, Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 28, 17–54.
13.
MaceyJ.O'HaraM. (2005), “From Markets to Venues: Securities Regulation in an Evolving World”, Stanford Law Review, vol. 58, 563–599.
14.
MahoneyP. (1997), “The Exchange as Regulator”, Virginia Law Review, vol. 83, 1453–1500.
15.
McAndrewsJ.StefanadisC. (2000), “The Emergence of Electronic Communications Networks in the U.S. Equity Markets”, Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 6, no. 12, 1–6.
16.
McAndrewsJ.StefanadisC. (2002), “The Consolidation of European Stock Exchanges”, Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 8, no. 6, 1–6.
17.
MühlbergerM. (2005), “Alternative Trading Systems: A Catalyst of Change in Securities Trading”, Deutsche Bank Research, no. 47, 1–12.
