This paper explores the status and possible regulation of the postal network in the broader context of Universal Postal Service provision and competition. It highlights the fact that there are several different ways to consider the future of the postal network. It then identifies three possible analogies from which the regulation of the postal network could be approached, namely the banking sector, railways, and telecommunications. Finally, the paper highlights possible scenarios for the future regulation of the postal network. In conclusion, the paper identifies the various factors which may determine this possible future regulation of the postal network.
BaldwinR. (2002). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BradleyM.ColvinJ. (2000). Measuring the Cost of Universal Service for Posts, in: CrewM.KleindorferP. R. (eds.), Current Directions in Postal Reform. Boston: Kluwer.
3.
De BijlP.van DammeE.LaroucheP. (2005). Light is right. Conditions for competition and regulation in the postal market. University of Tilburg, TILEC working paper.
4.
FelisbertoC.FingerM.FriedliB.KrähenbühlD.TrinknerU. (2005). Pricing the last mile in the postal sector. In: CrewM.A.KleindorferP.R. (eds.). Progress toward Liberalization of the Postal and Delivery Sector. New York: Springer, pp.227–248.
5.
FergusonW. W.WallerJ. D.XenakisS. S., (2000). ‘Universal Service without a Monopoly,’ in CrewM. A.KleindorferP. R., eds., Current Directions in Postal Reform, Boston.
6.
FingerM.AlyanakI.MolletP. (2005). Postal Sector Overview and Dynamics. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Chaire de management des industries de réseau. Working paper No. 5.
7.
FingerM.AlyanakI.RosselP. (2005). Universal Postal Service in the communications area: Adapting to changing markets and customer behaviour. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Chaire de management des industries de réseau; working paper No.4.
8.
GeradinD. (2002). The liberalization of postal services in the European Union. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
9.
HenryC.MatheuM.JeunemaîtreA. (eds.) (2001). Regulation of the Network Utilities. The European Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
JonssonP. (2004). “Regulatory Challenges in the Liberalized Postal Market”, paper presented at the Center for Research in Regulated Industries, 12th Conference on Postal and Delivery Economics, Cork, Ireland, 2–5 June 2004
11.
KiesslingT.BlondeelY. (1998): The EU regulatory framework in telecommunications: A critical analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 22: 571–592
12.
KniepsG. (1998), Costing and Pricing of Interconnection Services in a Liberalized European Telecommunication Market, in: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies (ed.): Telecommunications Reform in Germany: Lessons and Priorities, Washington, D.C., 51–73
KniepsG. (2004), Privatization of Network Industries in Germany: A Disaggregated Approach, Diskussionsbeiträge Nr. 100, Institut für Verkehrswissenschaft und Regionalpolitik, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i.Br.
15.
KniepsG. (2004), Competition in the post-trade markets: A network economic analysis of the securities business, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Vol. 6, No.1, 2006, S. 45–61
16.
NicholsonC. (1994). Access pricing in competitive postal services, Utilities Policy, Vol.4, No.3, pp. 199–204.
WIK-Consult (2005). The Evolution of the Regulatory Model for European Postal Services. Study for the European Commission, DG Internal Market. Wik-Consult, Bad Honnef.
