Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by chronic synovitis that hardly resolves spontaneously. The current treatment of RA consists of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Although the treat-to-target strategy has been intensively applied in the past decade, clinical unmet needs still exist since a substantial proportion of patients are refractory or even develop severe adverse effects to current therapies. In recent years, with the deeper understanding of immunopathogenesis of the disease, cell-based therapies have exhibited effective and promising interventions to RA. Several cell-based therapies, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), adoptive transfer of regulatory T cells (Treg), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy as well as their beneficial effects have been documented and verified so far. In this review, we summarize the current evidence and discuss the prospect as well as challenges for these three types of cellular therapies in RA.

Keywords

chimeric antigen receptor T cell mesenchymal stem cells regulatory T cells rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common autoimmune diseases characterized by chronic synovitis which mainly involved in small joints, affecting up to 1% of the general population worldwide.¹ The repertoire of therapeutic drugs of RA has been growing in the past decades. The current treatment of RA consists of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), and biologic agents, among which cDMARDs has long been the major therapy.² Actually, the past decades have witnessed tremendous innovations in RA therapy. On one hand, more and more potential druggable targets has been identified and developed, such as cells [e.g. B cells and fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS)], cytokines [e.g. tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)], signaling pathways [e.g. Janus kinase family (JAK), IL-1-receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK-4)], and epigenetic regulators (e.g. DNA methylation, histone modifications, and noncoding RNAs).^3–6 On the other hand, the treat-to-target (T2T) strategy has been intensively advocated in clinical practice, leading to the improved outcome of RA patients.⁷ However, despite the advent of novel biologic agents, increasing adverse events such as opportunistic infections preclude their broad application in clinic. Furthermore, a substantial proportion of patients remain resistant (or have limited efficiency) to current treatments.^8–10 Hence, more effective and safer therapies for RA are an unmet clinical need.

With the advancement of the research on the immunopathogenesis of RA and the progress of immunological techniques, cellular immunotherapy represented by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has attracted increasing attention.^11,12 Several preclinical and clinical studies have verified the efficacy and safety of MSC in RA, which has been reviewed elsewhere.^13–16 In addition, adoptive regulatory T cells (Treg) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells therapy also exhibit their application potential in a variety of autoimmune diseases including RA.^17–19 This review summarizes current evidence in cell-based therapies for RA. The underlying mechanisms as well as the challenges in clinical application are also discussed.

Dysregulated immune homeostasis in RA

Dysregulation of various innate and adaptive immune cells, cytokines, and other regulatory mediators are involved in the progression of RA. Knowledge of the imbalance between the pro-inflammatory mediators and anti-inflammatory mediators is vital for understanding the pathophysiology of RA and designing new therapeutic strategies. It is well established that in active RA patients, the amount of peripheral T helper 17 (Th17) cell and mRNA expression of its transcription factor RORγt are significantly increased, compared with inactive RA patients and healthy people.^20,21 The quantity of serum Th17 cells of RA patients is proved to be positively correlated with the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28), C-reactive protein (CRP), and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), indicating the principal role of Th17 cells in the inflammatory progression in RA.²² In comparison, peripheral Tregs and forkhead-box protein P3 (Foxp3), an indispensable transcription factor driving the differentiation of Treg cells, decrease in RA patients, causing Th17/Treg imbalance as well as an increase in disease severity.²⁰ In a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mouse model, adoptive transfusion with Tregs reduced Th17 cells and alleviated both arthritis and bone destruction.²³ Results from above studies validated that RA is a Th17-driven disease and Th17/Treg imbalance acts as a key factor in RA.^24,25 Meanwhile, indirect evidence from previous studies reported that M1/M2 macrophage ratio greater than 1 in RA is associated with higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), CRP, and more osteoclasts which exert a critical role in bone resorption and joint destruction.²⁶ A more recent study using new nanoparticles has demonstrated highly effective in damping inflammation via inducing M1 macrophage apoptosis and M2 macrophage polarization, suggesting the M1/M2 imbalance might be another crucial pro-inflammatory mediator in the progression of RA.²⁷

Both Th17/Treg imbalance and M1/M2 imbalance give rise to dysregulation of numerous cytokines.^28,29 Th17 and M1 macrophages in inflamed synovial tissue are the primary source of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-17, IL-23, and TNF-α, which exacerbate the inflammation as well as the joint damage.³⁰ Among them, IL-17 and TNF-α display a critical impact on the pathogenesis of RA. IL-17 and TNF-α initiate the secretion of degradative enzymes such as prostaglandins E2 (PGE2), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-9, and cathepsin K, leading to cartilage destruction.¹ Both cytokines induce the production of many other pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8, which not only aggregate the degradation of extracellular matrix protein but also stimulate the formation of inflammatory microenvironment in the synovium via CXCL8/IL-8.³¹ In RA, bone absorption is closely associated with the imbalance between excessive bone damage caused by osteoclasts and suppression of bone formation by osteoblasts.³² Accumulating evidence indicates that receptor activator for nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) accelerates the formation of osteoclasts, resulting in severe bone erosion and cartilage degradation.³³ IL-17 and TNF-α in synovial fibroblasts greatly enhance RANKL expression. In a RANKL transgenic mice model, a distinct reduction in bone mass was exhibited, caused by a rise in the osteoclast number.³⁴ Osteoclasts activated by IL-17 and TNF-α secrete SEMA4D to further suppress bone formation.³⁵ On osteoblasts, the Plexin-B1 binds SEMA4D and indirectly attenuates insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) signaling that enhances osteoblast differentiation.³⁵ To sum up, IL-17 and TNF-α promote bone erosion and inhibit bone formation. Notably, IL-17 also has the property of enhancing endothelial cell migration³⁶ and the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), prompting angiogenesis and pannus growth.³⁷

On the contrary, studies have illustrated that serum anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-5 in RA patients are remarkably lower than healthy people.^38,39 IL-4 possesses both immunosuppressive and anti-osteoclastogenic role in the modulation of RA.⁴⁰ In a murine CIA model treated with IL-4, a significant decrease in serum levels of rheumatoid factor (RF), CRP, antinuclear antibodies (ANA), and TNF-α was demonstrated.⁴¹ In addition, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-27, and IL-33 are all profound anti-arthritic cytokines promoting resolution of inflammation via various manners, which were summarized in our previous work.³⁹

MSC transplantation

Immunoregulatory effects of MSC

MSCs are stem cells that have the potential to regulate inflammatory processes and differentiate into mesenchymal lineages including osteoblasts and chondrocytes.⁴² MSCs are reported to generate a tolerogenic microenvironment by suppressing various innate and adaptive immune cells.^43,44 Exerting strong immunomodulatory effects, MSC transplantation is currently viewed as a promising therapy for multiple diseases such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD),⁴⁵ inflammatory bowel disease (IBD),⁴⁶ and kidney injury.⁴⁷ The underlying mechanisms may attribute to soluble factors produced by the MSCs and responses carried out by both innate and adaptive immune cells (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Immunoregulatory effects of MSC. MSCs generate an anti-inflammatory microenvironment by secreting soluble factors and mediating responses carried out by both innate and adaptive immune cells. In innate immune system, MSCs decrease the ratio of M1/M2 macrophages and modulate the phenotypes of DCs. In adaptive immune system, MSCs inhibit T cells and B cells while prompt Tregs and Bregs, restoring the balanced inflammatory setting.

Activated MSCs promote IL-10 and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) expression, attenuating M1 macrophage function and supporting M2 macrophage activation.^48,49 This is further confirmed that exosomes isolated from MSCs significantly decrease the level of M1 macrophage marker inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and promote M2 polarization.^50,51 CD1c⁺ dendritic cells (DCs) are tolerogenic DCs which produce high levels of IL-10 and suppress T-cell proliferation in an IL-10-dependent manner.⁵² Umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) are found to express FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3-ligand (FLT3L), which promotes the production and prevents the apoptosis of tolerogenic CD1c⁺ DCs; whereas knockdown of FLT3L in MSCs eliminates such effect, suggesting that FLT3L is indispensable for MSCs to exert immunosuppressive function.⁵³

In adaptive immune systems, MSCs inhibit effector T cells (T_eff) and B cells and promote the capacity of Tregs. In a fulminant hepatic failure model, MSCs were found to increase the ratio of Tregs/Th17 and downregulate TNF-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-1β, and IL-6, restoring the anti-inflammatory state.^54,55 MSCs mediate immunoregulatory responses partly by regulating DCs. Periapical lesions (PL)-MSC-developed DCs possess pro-tolerogenic properties and induce Tregs via IDO-1, immunoglobulin-like transcript (ILT)-3, and ILT-4.⁵⁶ Apart from DCs, various soluble regulators contribute to the immunosuppressive effect of MSCs. TNF-α is a priming factor to trigger the immunomodulatory effect of MSCs. TNF-α in inflammatory setting stimulates the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, a pivotal regulator in MSCs. In models of IBD and GVHD, administration of bone marrow (BM)-MSCs that overexpressed ICAM-1 showed decreasing Th17 and IL-17, and an increase in Tregs and transcription of Foxp3.^57,58 TNF-α-induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3), an ubiquitin-modifying enzyme, participates in the maintaining of immune homeostasis and prevents autoimmune diseases.⁵⁹ TNFAIP3 in MSCs inhibits TNF-α generation and promotes IL-10 proliferation; whereas knockdown of TNFAIP3 weakens the immunosuppressive capacity of MSCs both in vitro and in vivo as indicated that inhibition of T-cell proliferation is reversed.⁶⁰ In RA, MSC-derived exosomes are found to inhibit the activation of FLS, cells that exert a key role on the progression of RA, through miR-143-3p/TNFAIP3/NF-κB pathway, emphasizing the vital role of TNFAIP3.⁶¹ Moreover, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) is a metabolic regulator required for MSC. Silencing of HIF1α in MSC is found to increase the ratio of Th17/Tregs, associated with the metabolic alteration and reduced immunosuppressive mediators like ICAM, IL-6, and nitric oxide (NO).⁶² In adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSC), the level of MMP9 is increased. Interestingly, inhibition of MMP9 significantly diminishes the suppressive effect on T_eff cells of AD-MSC, suggesting that MMP9 plays a critical role in the immunomodulatory activity of MSCs.⁶³ Astonishingly, IL-17 promotes immunosuppression rather than inflammation in the presence of MSCs. In a concanavalin A-induced hepatitis mouse model, physiologically pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-17 dramatically enhanced the immunosuppression of MSCs on T_eff cells in an iNOS-dependent manner.⁶⁴ Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PDL1) is a costimulatory molecule which exerts strong negative effects on immune responses.⁶⁵ In a CIA model, the immunomodulatory function of MSCs was demonstrated to be highly related to PDL1 as blockage of PDL1 was associated with noticeable mitigation of MSCs-based immunosuppression. On the contrary, the immunosuppressive effect was enhanced when PDL1 was overexpressed.⁶⁶ MSCs also restrict inflammatory responses via mitochondria. Adoptive transfer of MSC-derived mitochondria was proved to increase the expression of Foxp3, cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), which are involved in T_eff cells suppression. In a GVHD mouse model, MSC-derived mitochondria indirectly led to significant reduction in tissue damage by alleviating CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration.⁶⁷ In addition, MSCs exert suppressive function on B cells. In a study during which BM-MSCs and B cells were cocultured, proliferation of B cells was found to be inhibited by MSCs through a cessation in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle.⁶⁸ MSCs also downregulate the function of B cells and induce the generation of regulatory B cells (Breg) which secrete IL-10.⁶⁹ Besides, MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) are indispensable for MSC-based immunosuppression, which convert immune cells to immunosuppressive phenotypes via the delivery of immunoregulatory miRNAs and proteins.⁷⁰

Capacity of MSC in bone and cartilage regeneration

MSCs possess regenerative property to repair parenchymal tissue and organs through differentiating into lineages of mesenchymal tissues, including MSC-osteoblast-osteocyte and MSC-chondroblast-chondrocyte lineages.⁷¹ Increasing evidence have demonstrated that MSCs prompt bone regeneration, mineralization, and enhance bone healing.⁷² It has been proved that MSCs promote osteoblast differentiation and are able to repair both preclinical calvarial bone defects and clinical diseases like severe mandibular ridge resorption.^73–75 MSCs foster a regenerative microenvironment by secreting a broad spectrum of paracrine factors including MSC-EVs.⁷⁶ MSC-EVs have been verified to enhance bone formation as shown in significantly increased osteogenic gene expression like type I collagen (COL I), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin (OCN), and osteopontin (OPN).⁷⁷ In MSC-EVs, the pro-osteogenic microRNAs such as miR-10b and miR-21 are increased, while the anti-osteogenic microRNAs like miR-31, miR-144, and miR-221 are decreased.⁷¹ miR-135 is seen as another osteogenesis-related microRNA which is increased during the osteogenesis of AD-MSCs. miR-135 enhances the expression of bone markers and extracellular matrix calcium deposition through miR-135/Homeobox A2 (Hoxa2)/Runx2 pathway, whereas the knockdown of miR-135 blocks such processes. Exosomes isolated from BM-MSCs (BMSC-Exos) also significantly enhance bone growth by promoting angiogenesis.⁷⁸ Exosome mimetics (EMs) possess an intrinsic homing effect with high stability. It has been demonstrated that EMs in MSCs could enhance osteogenesis via inhibition of miR-29a.⁷⁹ Indian hedgehog (Ihh) signaling pathway is a major member of endochondral bone development, which participates in the regenerative capacity of MSCs.⁸⁰ MSCs that overexpressing Ihh possess a strong effect in promoting bone repair and the chondrogenesis.⁸¹ Pro-inflammatory cytokines in the inflammatory setting also promote osteogenesis. Activator protein 2a (AP2a) is found to promote differentiation in MSCs by enhancing Runx2 activity. AP2a also targets and directly represses transcription of BARX1, a downstream gene of AP2a inhibiting osteogenic differentiation potential in MSCs, indirectly prompting bone regeneration.⁸² Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a downstream effector of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling involved in osteoblast differentiation and bone regeneration.⁸³ SATB2 is found to enhance the expression of bone matrix proteins and osteogenic transcription factors in MSCs.⁸⁴ Besides, MSCs effectively differentiate into osteoblasts and mineralize through IL-1/Wnt-5a/Ror2 pathway, confirmed by enhanced ALP activity and expression of Runx2.⁸⁵ In addition, MSCs indirectly promote bone regeneration by inhibiting the function of osteoclasts. MSC-EVs suppress the formation of osteoclasts via osteoprotegerin (OPG)-RANKL-RANK signaling pathway, thus indirectly promote the formation of bone tissues.⁸⁶

MSC transplantation in RA

Many preclinical studies indicated that in mouse models of CIA, treatment with MSCs obtained from various sources significantly alleviated synovitis and bone erosion.^87,88 It has been demonstrated that human MSCs significantly attenuated inflammatory arthritis in CIA mice, with significantly lower inflammation and erosion score.⁸⁹ In CIA rats treated with MSCs, joint injury and inflammation were significantly improved and pathological changes were ameliorated, including lymphocyte infiltration, synovial hyperplasia, cartilage damage, joint destruction, and excessive formation of pannus in the ankles.⁹⁰ MSC transplantation also significantly downregulated the number of osteoclasts, IL-17 and TNF-α while enhanced the mRNA expression of IL-10 and TGF-β1 in the ankle joints.⁹¹ In another RA rat model, improvement of paw edema, RA score, cytokine assay, and antioxidant state was exhibited in rats that received MSCs.⁹² Results from other experiments showed that MSC treatment alleviated signs of synovitis in CIA mice, reverting to the values of healthy rats. This was evident by the decrease in the levels of RF, CRP and ANA.^41,92 Moreover, TNF-α and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels decreased with MSC treatment. Similarly, gene expression data showed amelioration in mice receiving MSC therapy where cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (Comp), tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase-1 (Timp1), MMP-1, and IL-1 receptor (Il-1r) gene expression levels decreased.^41,93 MSCs were also shown to promote Treg differentiation and reduce Th17 differentiation.⁸⁹ In CIA mice after MSC transplantation, studies also found that both the number and function of follicular helper T (Tfh) cells were downregulated, which are capable of assisting B cells for the production of high-affinity autoantibodies.⁹⁴ MSCs can mediate T cell apoptosis via FasL/Fas pathway, resulting in immune tolerance and ameliorating the severity of CIA in mice.⁹⁵ Micro-CT imaging confirmed that osteoporosis and bone destruction in rats were significantly improved, and pathological analysis of the joint revealed that MSCs potentially inhibit synovial hyperplasia and cartilage destruction in CIA rats.⁹⁶

Also, several clinical studies have confirmed the safety and potential of MSCs on RA patients.^97,98 In clinical trials, MSCs transplantation has been proved to be safe and effective (Table 1). The administration of many sources of MSCs was shown to be well tolerated, without evidence of dose-related toxicity.^99,100 After MSCs transplantation, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and DAS28 of 1 and 3 years after treatment significantly decreased.^97,101 Levels of ESR, CRP, RF, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) of 1 and 3 years after MSCs treatment were also lower in RA patients in various clinical trials.^97,102 Further study showed that the Treg/Th17 ratio was increased in the MSCs therapy group, supporting that MSCs play important roles in regulating immune homeostasis in RA.^103,104 MSCs can significantly inhibit T cells in RA patients and regulate the expression of cytokines in the pathophysiologic process of RA.¹⁰⁵ After MSCs transplantation, patients showed improved immune balance as manifested by decreased IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α and increased TGF-β1 and IL-10 levels.^98,104,106 In a phase I clinical trial, plasma concentration of B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) in refractory RA patients, cytokines from a large family of TNF promoting differentiation and survival of B cells, significantly decreased after the MSCs transplantation. Consistently, the gene expression of BAFF-receptor significantly decreased on month 6 after the MSC transplantation.¹⁰⁷ Surprisingly, IFN-γ strongly enhance the clinical effects of MSCs. In a phase I/II randomized controlled trial, the clinical symptoms, disease activity indexes, and antibodies levels were more promptly ameliorated in patients receiving MSCs together with IFN-γ compared with single MSCs treatment. Moreover, the ratio of Tregs/Th17 was also enhanced more rapidly.¹⁰⁸ In addition, researchers found that IFN-γ may play a vital role in predicting clinical responses of RA patients to MSCs as high level of IFN-γ was related to decreasing DAS28 and high Tregs/Th17 ratio.¹⁰⁴ Evidence from above clinical trials supports the notion that MSCs transplantation may be a promising, safe and effective therapy strategy to treat RA.

Table 1.

Current clinical trials with MSC transplantation in RA.

Clinical trial identifier	Status	Clinical phase	Date (start-completion)	Country	Methods	Number of patients enrolled	Outcome measures	References
NCT01873625	Completed	II/III	2009–2011	Iran	MSC	60	Pain, physical activity, walking distance and imaging	Shadmanfar et al. ¹⁰⁰
NCT01663116	Completed	I/II	2011–2013	Spain	AD-MSC	53	AE, serious AE and proportion of ACR20/ACR50/ACR70	Alvaro-Gracia et al.⁹⁹
NCT01547091	Completed	I/II	2013–2014	China	hUC-MSC + DMARDs	200	Safety, RA serology, DAS28 and assessment of pain	Qi et al.⁹⁷, Wang et al.¹⁰¹, Wang et al.¹⁰³
NCT01851070	Completed	II	2013–2017	United States	MPCs	48	Safety and efficacy	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01851070?term=NCT01851070&draw=2&rank=1
NCT01985464	Unknown	I/II	2013–2020	Panama	UC-MSC	20	AE, CRP, ESR, anticitrulline antibody, RF, HAQ, DAS28, EULAR	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01985464?term=NCT01985464&draw=2&rank=1
NCT02221258	Completed	I	2014–2015	Korea	UC-MSC	9	Safety	Park et al.¹⁰⁶
NCT02643823	Unknown	I	2016–2017	China	hUC-MSC + DMARDs	40	Severity of AE, RA serology and DAS28	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02643823?term=NCT02643823&draw=2&rank=1
NCT03333681	Completed	I	2016–2018	Iran	BM -MSC	15	Percentage of Tregs	Ghoryani et al.⁹⁸, Ghoryani et al.¹⁰² Gowhari et al.¹⁰⁷
ChiCTR-ONC-16008770	Completed	I	2016–2018	China	hUC-MSC	50	DAS28, HAQ, CRP and ESR	Yang et al.¹⁰⁴
NCT03067870	Not recruiting	I	2016–2022	Jordan	BM-MSC	100	VAS, physical activity and resurfacing of articular cartilage	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03067870?term=NCT03067870&draw=2&rank=1
ChiCTR-INR-17012462	Completed	I/II	2017–2018	China	hUC-MSC + IFN-γ	30	DAS28, HAQ, CRP, ESR, Treg, Th17, and IFN-γ	He et al.¹⁰⁸
NCT03798028	Unknown	/	2017–2020	China	UC-MSC	250	HBG, FVC, or DLCO, or all three, ACR 20/50/70, white blood cell and platelet count, rate of blood routine hemoglobin, high resolution CT of lung and 6-min walking distance	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03798028?term=NCT03798028&draw=2&rank=1
NCT03186417	Recruiting	I	2017–2022	United States	hMSC	20	DLT, spirometry, AE, and DAS28-CRP	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03186417?term=NCT03186417&draw=1&rank=1
NCT03691909	Completed	I/II	2018–2020	United States	AD-MSC	15	AE, TNF-α, IL-6, CRP, ESR, and Joint Count 66/68	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03691909?term=NCT03691909&draw=2&rank=1
NCT03618784	Recruiting	I/II	2018–2021	Korea	UC-MSC	33	AE, ACR20/50/70, EULAR, DAS 28-ESR, KHAQ, CDAI, Pain VAS, and change in cytokine	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03618784?term=NCT03618784&draw=2&rank=1
NCT03828344	Active, not recruiting	I	2020–2022	United States	UC-MSC	16	AE and serious AE, ACR20/50/70, DAS28-CRP, HAQ-DI, SDAI, RF, and anti-CCP	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03828344?term=NCT03828344&draw=2&rank=1
NCT04971980	Recruiting	I/II	2021–2022	China	UC-MSC	9	AE, changes of vital signs, complete blood count, blood biochemical, coagulation function, routine urine analysis, urine pregnancy test, cardiac rate, ACR20/50/70, TNF-α, IL-6, DAS28, HAQ, SDAI, and CDAI	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04971980?term=NCT04971980&draw=2&rank=1
NCT04170426	Active, not recruiting	I/II	2021–2024	United States	AD-MSC	54	AE, serious AE, and proportion of ACR20 patients	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04170426?term=NCT04170426&draw=1&rank=1
NCT05003934	Recruiting	I	2021–2025	Antigua and Barbuda	AlloRx	20	AE, DAS28, and VAS	https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05003934?term=NCT05003934&draw=2&rank = 1

ACR, American College of Rheumatology; AD, adipose tissue; AE, adverse events; anti-CCP, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide; BM, bone marrow; CDAI, clinical disease activity index; CRP, C-reactive protein; DAS28, Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts; DLCO, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity; DLT, Dose limiting toxicity; DMARD, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; EULAR, European League against Rheumatism; FVC, forced vital capacity; HAQ, Quality of Life Questionnaire; HBG, blood routine hemoglobin; hUC, human umbilical cord; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; KHAQ, Korean Health assessment questionnaire; MPC, Mesenchymal Precursor Cells; MSC, mesenchymal stem cells; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RF, rheumatoid factor; SDAI, Simplified Disease Activity Index; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; Treg, regulatory T cell; VAS, visual analogue scale.

Adoptive regulatory T cells immunotherapy

Tregs are a subset of specialized CD4⁺ helper T cells defined by the expression of the IL-2 receptor α-chain (CD25) and the transcription factor Foxp3.¹⁰⁹ Having a pivotal function in maintaining immune tolerance by down-regulating aberrant immune stimulations, Tregs are reported to be important in the prevention of autoimmune diseases such as autoimmune gastritis, thyroiditis, graft rejection and multiple sclerosis.¹¹⁰ Depletion of Tregs results in an exacerbation of arthritis and development of gastritis and thyroiditis.^111,112 Adoptive Tregs immunotherapy has been proved critically vital in the prevention of autoimmune disease, tissue repair, and regeneration, suggesting that manipulation of these cells is a promising alternative treatment to treat or even cure autoimmune diseases.¹¹³ Currently, researchers have successfully used Tregs in the treatment of established colitis.¹¹⁴ Prophylactic treatment with CD4⁺ CD25⁺ Tregs has also been reported to diminish the severity of other autoimmune diseases such as GVHD,¹¹⁵ experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE),¹¹⁶ and diabetes.¹¹⁷ In RA, dysregulation of self-tolerance leads to generation of autoreactive lymphocytes which target tissue-specific auto-antigens in joints.¹¹⁸ The ultimate treatment strategy should be to re-induce self-tolerance before severe tissue damage. Therefore, Tregs are ideal options. However, compared with the healthy people, apparent deficiencies are found in numbers and functions of Tregs in RA patients.¹¹⁹ The link between defects of Tregs in RA patients and mechanisms of autoimmunity establishes the foundation for using adoptive Tregs therapy to treat RA.

Effects of Tregs on immune modulation

Tregs downregulate immune response by modulating proliferation, activation, and cytokine production of APC, CD4⁺, CD8⁺ T cells and B cells.^120,121 Tregs exert immunosuppressive effects mainly by two mechanisms: contact-dependent or contact-independent suppression. Lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) and CTLA-4 are surface markers expressed on Tregs acting in contact-dependent modulation.¹²² By binding to MHC-II, LAG-3 mitigates the costimulatory capacity of DCs and the immune response of T cells.¹²³ CTLA-4 downregulates costimulatory markers CD80/CD86 on APCs, inhibiting antigen presentation of APCs and inhibition of T-cell activation.¹²⁴ In contact-independent manners, Tregs secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines like TGF-β, IL-10, and IL-3 and cytolysis factors such as granzyme A, granzyme B, and perforin.¹²⁵ Apart from the above well-known mechanisms, Tregs also efficiently induce mitochondrion-dependent cell death of DC through Bax and Bak (members of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family)-dependent cell death mechanisms, thus regulating antigen-specific immune responses and restoring immune tolerance.¹²⁶ Induced CD4⁺ Foxp3⁺ Tregs (iTregs) stimulate splenic CD11c⁺ DCs and generate DC_iTreg, which is a tolerogenic phenotype and secretes high levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines in CIA model like IL-10, TGF-β, and IDO, exhibiting immunosuppressive activity.¹²⁷ In Tregs, V-domain Ig suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA), a novel immunoglobulin superfamily ligand, is highly expressed.¹²⁸ VISTA is able to suppress T-cell function, whereas anti-VISTA mono-antibody significantly converts resting CD8⁺ T cell into active cells.¹²⁹ SUMO-specific proteases (SENPs) are enzymes mediating deSUMOylation.¹³⁰ SENPs are found to be important regulators for the stability and function of Tregs by enhancing deSUMOylation and inhibiting the transcription of T_eff while increased SUMOylation prompts T_eff activation.¹³¹ Tregs-derived TGF-β1 also participates in the maintaining of autoimmunity suppression and peripheral tolerance, and block of expression of TGF-β1 is demonstrated to result in allergy and autoimmunity.¹³² Progranulin (PGRN) is an anti-inflammatory growth factor that is broadly expressed in numerous cells including immune cells. In PGRN-deficient mice, severe inflammatory arthritis is developed and addition of PGRN could reverse such arthritis. In one CIA model, it was demonstrated that PGRN exerted immunosuppressive capacity by enhancing the secretion of IL-10 by Tregs, which is related to Foxo4 and Stat3.¹³³

Adoptive Treg cells immunotherapy in arthritis

In adoptive Tregs immunotherapy, autologous or allogeneic Tregs are isolated, ex vivo activated, expanded, and then infused to the patient.¹³⁴ Adoptive Tregs immunotherapy have been proved effective in animal models of autoimmune diseases such as CIA, colitis,¹³⁵ autoimmune cholangitis,¹³⁶ and glomerulonephritis.¹³⁷ Of note, adoptive Tregs immunotherapy has been used in clinical trials to prevent systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE),¹⁸ type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM),¹³⁸ and GVHD¹⁹ for its successful outcomes.

In CIA models, studies have verified that adoptively transferred Tregs quickly appeared in synovial tissue after injection and blocked T-cell proliferation as well as type II collagen (CII)–specific proliferation, distinctly decreasing the severity and decelerating disease progression.¹¹⁰ Nonetheless, one biologic characteristic of Tregs is functional instability and conversion phenotypically into detrimental T_eff.¹³⁹ The foremost bottleneck of adoptive Tregs therapy is maintaining the stability and plasticity of Tregs. Moreover, Tregs in peripheral blood constitute only 1% to 3% of the mature CD4⁺ T cell subpopulation in mice and humans, which is another challenge for clinical application.¹⁴⁰ The prerequisites for successful adoptive Tregs immunotherapy are identification of specific auto-antigen, effective methods to expand Tregs, and proper epigenetic regulation of Tregs stability.

Obtaining antigen-specific Tregs

It has been reported that polyclonal Tregs prevented and almost ceased arthritis progression.²³ However, polyclonal Tregs transfer may cause temporary suppression of the whole immune system.¹⁴¹ Antigen-specific Tregs, developing antigen-specific tolerance by inhibiting Ag-specific T_eff cells while also permitting an intact immune response toward other antigens, can be a suitable treatment strategy with low systemic side effects.¹⁴² T-cell receptor (TCR), responsible for recognizing fragments of antigens, is essentially required for maturation and function of Tregs.¹⁴³ To generate self-Ag specific Tregs, it is a good choice to use TCR transduction. In one study, OTII-TCR gene was transferred into purified CD4⁺ CD25⁺ T cells to redirect the specificity of naturally occurring Tregs. Adoptive transfer of gene modified Tregs into recipient mice has been proved to achieve targeted immune suppression, improving inflammatory knee swelling and reducing the numbers of Th17 cells.¹⁴⁴ Although TCR transduction in T cells has been proved to be safe, feasible, and applicable, there are still safety concerns caused by cross-reactivity with healthy tissues.¹⁴⁵ Another approach to generate antigen-specific Tregs is to culture CD4⁺ T cells from CIA animals with TGF-β1, IL-2, retinoic acid, APCs, and CII then expand such CII-specific Tregs with anti-CD3 antibody, anti-CD28 antibody, TGF-β1, IL-2, and retinoic acid. Adoptive transfer of these antigen-specific Tregs has been shown to be stable in vivo and reverse the CIA progression by suppressing the proliferation of CD4⁺ T cells and the key inflammatory cytokine TNF-α.¹⁴⁶

Type 1 Tregs (Tr1) are unique Tregs producing high levels of IL-10. In CII-specific TCR transgenic mice, CII-specific Tr1 (Col-Treg) cells were isolated and expanded. Infusion of Col-Treg cells significantly dampened the proliferation of antigen-specific T_eff and reduced the incidence and severity of arthritis symptoms as measured by reductions in paw swelling, arthritic scores, and CII-specific antibody titers, providing a great perspective for the development of novel therapeutic approaches to RA.¹⁴⁷ Although specific disease-inducing antigens are important, it is unknown which antigens are critical for RA. Bystander antigens such as Peptide19 has been demonstrated to be similarly effective in inducing T-cell regulation and suppressing arthritis.^148,149 Peptide19 is a predominant epitope and a target molecule driving epitope spreading and bystander suppression in autoimmune diseases.¹⁵⁰ Adoptively transferred peptide 19-specific naïve CD4⁺ CD25⁺ CD45RA⁺ Tregs (45RA-Tregs) into mice had a strong power to suppress T-cell function and alleviate CIA, as indicated by the complete elimination of footpad swelling, prolonged survival, little histopathologic changes, and preferential localization of CD4⁺ CD25⁺ Tregs at the articular joints.¹⁴⁸

Expansion of antigen-specific Tregs

To reach a successful adoptive Tregs therapy for RA patients, sufficient number of infused cells and effective expansion of Ag-specific Tregs without losing their specificity or capacities are required. There are two major strategies to augment the number of Tregs: expanding antigen-specific Tregs or converting antigen-specific conventional T cells into Tregs ex vivo.

Tregs-specific targeted gene proliferation stimulators and immune complexes are broadly used to promote the expansion of Tregs.¹⁵¹ One basic adoptive cell therapy is to expand Tregs with anti-CD3, anti-CD28, IL-2, and rapamycin, increasing the number of Tregs up to thousands of times without losing the inhibitory activity.^151,152 In a prospective, open-label, phase I to IIa study treating patients with RA, low-dose IL-2 was demonstrated to be well tolerated and effective, which activated and expanded specific Treg without T_eff cells activation, thus increasing the Treg/T_eff.¹¹⁴ There are other strategies for expanding Tregs. For instance, CD28 superagonist stimulation in vitro is more efficient in promoting Tregs proliferation compared with anti-CD3/antiCD28 method.¹⁵³ Studies have also verified that employing superagonistic anti-CD28 antibodies and IL-2 was a promising protocol for large-scale in vitro generation of Tregs.¹⁵⁴ Tregs can be expanded by APCs. Vitamin D3, glucocorticoids, IL-10, TGF-β, and vasoactive intestinal peptide induce tolerogenic DCs, expanding Treg cells indirectly. Induced Tregs expanded by mature tolerogenic DCs (iTreg_mtDC) suppressed CD4⁺ T-cell proliferation and Th17-cell differentiation to a greater extent and reduced the severity and progression of CIA more significantly than iTregs. iTreg_mtDC also has the capacity to increase the production of IFN-γ, TGF-β, and IL-10, and reduce the level of TNF, IL-17, IL-6 and anti-CII IgG.¹⁵⁵ In addition, immature BM-derived DCs (iDCs) could induce the expansion of CD4⁺ CD49b⁺ Tregs, which reverse clinical symptoms of arthritis and provide continuing protection. In mice adoptively transferred with CD4⁺ CD49b⁺ Tregs, histologic examination of arthritic joints revealed a decreased inflammatory synovitis, pannus formation, and inflammatory cell infiltration.¹⁵⁶ In one adjuvant arthritis model, BM cells were cultured in the presence of GM-CSF, giving rise to a population of CD11c⁺MHCII⁺CD45R⁺CD8^-DCs (BMDCs). CD4⁺ T cells cocultured with the BMDCs were expanded to 90% of Foxp3⁺ Tregs. Such ex vivo–generated Tregs were proved to suppress the arthritis upon their reintroduction to the host.¹⁵⁷

Retroviral Foxp3 gene transfer converts naive CD4⁺ T cells into Tregs, whose phenotype is similar to the naturally occurring CD4⁺ CD25⁺ Foxp3⁺ Tregs.¹⁴⁴ Study has proved that CII primed Foxp3-transduced T cells in CIA rats significantly reduced arthritis severity, T-cell infiltration, level of CII-specific IgG, and pro-inflammatory cytokine including IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17.¹⁵² In another murine model of RA, FoxP3 with anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family molecule Bcl-xL were linked and transduced into CD4⁺ T cells, which differentiated into functional Tregs. Adoptive transfer of Tregs expressing both Foxp3 and Bcl-xL was demonstrated effective in suppressing RA than CD4⁺ T cells expressing Foxp3 alone and sustained survival in vitro.¹⁵⁸

Apart from CD4⁺ Tregs, CD8⁺ Tregs also exert immunosuppressive effect. In a CIA model, human CD8⁺ T cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells were induced and expanded with TGF-β1, rapamycin along with anti-CD3/28 and IL-2 in vitro, which turned into hCD8⁺ Tregs. After adoptive transfusion, hCD8⁺ Tregs exhibited vigorous suppression ability in CIA mice as indicated by the reduced clinical scores, levels of anti-collagen IgG antibody, cartilage erosion, CD4⁺ T_eff proliferation, number of Th17, mRNA expression of IL-17, RANKL, and MMP1 and CD80/86 expression on DCs.²³ B cells can also induce Tregs, known as Treg-of-B cells, which express LAG3 but not Foxp3. Treg-of-B cells suppress the proliferation of CD4⁺ T cells through the production of LAG3 and IL-10. In a CIA model, Treg-of-B cells alleviated the disease severity as well as local and systemic inflammation by inhibiting IL-6, TNF-α,¹⁵⁹ and TRAP, a common biomarker of functional osteoclasts.¹⁶⁰ Ag-specific Tregs can be developed from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) as well. Adoptive transfer of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs into Ag-induced arthritis (AIA) mice was shown to reduce joint inflammation and swelling and to prevent bone loss.¹⁶¹

Maintaining the stability of expanded Tregs is another bottleneck in applications of adoptive Tregs immunotherapy. As an essential factor in the differentiation and function of Tregs, Foxp3 as well as its stable expression is required. In a recent experiment, adoptive transfer of TNF receptor type II (TNFRII)⁺ Tregs increased Foxp3 gene methylation in Tregs, ameliorating the inflammation and preventing aggravation of arthritis.¹⁶² In contrast, the deletion of TNFRII resulted in increased severity of experimental arthritis and reduced both numbers and capacity of Tregs.¹⁶³ It is reported that phosphorylation of Foxp3 is regulated by a TGF-β activated kinase 1 (TAK1)-Nemo-like kinase (NLK) signaling pathway. TAK1-NLK pathway promotes the phosphorylation and thus enhances the stability of Foxp3 by inhibiting the combination with STUB1 E3-ubiquitin protein ligase. The lack of NLK in Tregs is found to increase the incidence of autoimmunity.¹⁶⁴ Moreover, as mentioned before, numerous genes and signal pathways are involved in the function of Tregs. Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that upregulating the expression of involved genes such as CTLA-4, PD-1 may increase the stability of Tregs.¹⁶⁵

Notably, one recent study has verified the concept of using Treg activation to treat RA. Tregalizumab is a monoclonal anti-CD4 IgG antibody selectively activating Tregs but not T_eff cells.¹⁶⁶ In a phase IIb, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, the efficacy and safety of tregalizumab were measured in patients with active RA.¹⁶⁷ Although tregalizumab was shown to exert biological effects on CD4 modulation, it was not clinically effective compared with placebo. This was probably because that the expected effect would have been achieved after a longer treatment period due to some special mechanisms of Tregs activation. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that tregalizumab might be used in early phase or preclinical phase of RA in the future.

Emerging CAR-T cells in the treatment of RA

Malfunction of T-cell tolerance plays a principal role in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases including RA. Therefore, restoring immune tolerance is of great significance. Nevertheless, current treatments have little effect on immune tolerance inverse. CAR-T cells are bioengineered redirected T lymphocytes expressing specific receptor in the membrane that can recognize a specific antigen of a target cell without MHC restriction, thus interacting with target cells.¹⁶⁸ To create CAR-T cells, T cells from peripheral blood of a patient are separated and then CAR genes are inserted into T cell genome, followed by expansion of manufactured CAR-T cells and infusion back into the patient.¹⁶⁹ Nowadays, the major use of CAR-T cells is in the treatment of various cancers. Recently, the CAR-T cells are also utilized in preclinical experiments of RA, colitis, SLE, pemphigus vulgaris (PV), EAE and type 1 diabetes, bringing new hope of treatment choice for autoimmune diseases.^170,171 In the preclinical models above, three different approaches have been used, including identifying a specific antigen in a target cell and initiating cytotoxic activity by CAR-T cells, generating a cytotoxic effect on autoantibody-releasing B cell by chimeric autoantibody receptor T cells (CAAR-T), and binding to a specific antigen in a target cell to exert regulatory function of Tregs by chimeric antigen receptor in regulatory T lymphocytes (CAR-Treg).¹⁷² CAAR-T has a variation of modified CAR and consists of a specific antigen, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular signaling domain.¹⁷³ CAAR-T targets autoreactive B cells and exerts selective cytotoxicity function only against immune cells that carry receptors to specific auto-antigen without universal immunosuppression. When the specific antigen of the CAAR-T cells encounters and binds to the specific auto-antibodies expressed on B cells, the B cells will be destroyed, thus reducing the generation of autoantibodies.¹⁷¹ CAR-Tregs regulate autoimmune T cells by inducing anergy and immunological ignorance.¹⁷⁴ CAR-Tregs generate immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-10, IL-35, and TGF-β and induce apoptosis of T_eff cells via Fas-ligand, granzyme B/A, and perforin, thus suppressing T_eff cells.¹⁷⁵

CAR-T and autoimmune diseases

Five-module receptor complexes consist of a TCR module, three CD3 signaling modules, and a coreceptor module, playing an indispensable role in T cells.¹⁷⁶ Biomimetic five-module chimeric antigen receptor (^5MCAR), which consists of a surrogate coreceptor module and a chimeric receptor module composed of specific antigen and elements of the TCR, has been found to eliminate pathogenic T cells and mediate autoimmune disease in mice.¹⁷⁶ In a nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice model, adoptively transferred ^5MCAR–T cells could rapidly home to inflamed pancreases and attenuate T1DM by targeting autoimmune CD4⁺ T cells.¹⁷⁶ CD4⁺ insulin-reactive T cells target the insulin β-chain 9–23 peptide (B:9–23) in NOD. IA^g7 (a single MHC class II molecule)–insulin B:9–23 complex is crucial for the initiation of autoimmune responses in the NOD mouse.¹⁷⁷ mAb287 can selectively bind to IA^g7-B:9–23 complexes and prevent T1DM.¹⁷⁸ One study has verified that 287-CAR T cells selectively migrated to pancreatic lymph nodes after adoptive transfer and delayed disease onset, inhibiting islet autoimmunity.¹⁷⁹ CD19 is a B-cell surface marker that is intimately involved in B-cell signaling, proliferation, and differentiation.¹⁸⁰ In the (NZB × NZW) F1 and MRL^fas/fas mouse models of lupus, CD8⁺ T cells expressing CD19-targeted CARs persistently depleted CD19⁺ B cells and effectively eliminated autoantibody production, reversing disease manifestations and extending life spans of mice.¹⁸¹ A more recent study proved that in MRL-lpr mice, a spontaneous murine SLE disease model, adoptive transfer of anti-CD19 CAR T cells not only exerted durable therapeutic efficacy as sustained B-cell depletion but also prevented disease progression before the onset of symptoms.¹⁷⁰

In the antibody-mediated autoimmune disease PV, CAAR comprising the major PV auto-antigen desmoglein (Dsg) 3 was engineered to T cells. Dsg3 CAAR-T cells were shown to exhibit specific cytotoxicity against cells expressing anti-Dsg3 BCRs both in vitro and in vivo, dramatically decreasing Dsg3 serum autoantibody titers and ameliorating the symptoms.¹⁷¹

Compared with CAR-T and CAAR-T, CAR-Tregs are more commonly investigated in autoimmune diseases. CAR redirects Tregs to the site where autoimmune activity happens, increasing their suppressive efficiency without systemic immunosuppression. In an acute experimental colitis model, tripartite chimeric receptor (TPCR) was developed, which composed of an antibody variable region specific for 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol (TNP) that was attached to the extracellular and transmembrane domain of the CD28 costimulatory molecule and intracellular domain of the stimulatory Fc-γ receptor chain. Adoptive transfer of Tregs that transgenically expressing TPCR resulted in antigen-specific Tregs accumulation and activation at inflamed colonic sites, leading to antigen-specific suppression and significant alleviation of acute experimental colitis induced by 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (TNBS).¹⁸² In T-cell transfer colitis model, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) transgenic CAR was redirected and introduced into Tregs to generate CEA-specific CAR-Treg. CEA CAR-Tregs were able to accumulate in the colons and suppress the severity of colitis of diseased mice.¹⁸³ In the murine EAE model, murine Foxp3 gene along with CAR targeting myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) were transduced to CD4⁺ T cells, generating MOG CAR-Tregs. Localizing to the central nervous system (CNS) and binding to MOG⁺ oligodendrocytes, CNS-targeting CAR-Tregs exhibited powerful protective effect and efficiently suppressed ongoing inflammation and diminished symptoms.¹⁸⁴ In another T1D model, CAR was used to redirect T-cell specificity toward insulin and T_eff cells were transformed to Tregs by Foxp3 transduction. Such insulin-targeted CAR-Tregs exerted stable suppressive function in the pancreas of diabetic mice.¹⁸⁵ Vitiligo is an autoimmune disease in which ganglioside D3 (GD3) antigen is found in stressed melanocytes and contributes to melanogenesis.¹⁸⁶ In a mouse model of progressive vitiligo, GD3-responsive CAR was introduced to Tregs. GD3 CAR-Treg protected melanocytes from T-cell-mediated destruction and significantly delayed the progress of depigmentation without obvious side effects.¹⁸⁷

CAR-T in RA

Since a CAR or CAAR targets only a single cell type, application of such novel treatment strategy to RA is limited, in which various types of autoreactive responses present. One study first designed antigenic peptides for specific recognition by pathogenic B cells and provided a direction for the customized treatment of RA according to patient’s specific auto-antigen profiles.¹⁷ In RA, ACPAs are one of the most specific serological markers which is associated with disease development.¹⁸⁸ In this experiment, four citrullinated peptide epitopes including citrullinated vimentin, citrullinated type II collagen, citrullinated fibrinogen and tenascin C, and a cyclocitrulline peptide-1 were selected as ligands for targeting autoreactive B cells. Then, engineered T cells expressing a fixed anti-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) CAR were constructed and tested to eliminate specific autoreactive B cells via recognition of the above FITC-labeled auto-antigenic peptide epitopes. It has been proved that specifically redirected anti-FITC CAR-T cells had the potential of recognizing corresponding FITC-labeled citrullinated peptide epitope and lysis autoreactive B-cell subsets from RA patients in vitro successfully.¹⁷

Perspective and challenges

With accumulating evidence and progressing technologies, cell-based therapy has shown preliminary therapeutic potential for RA. However, thorough preclinical and clinical investigations are required to apply cell-based therapy in clinical practice, since such novel practical therapeutic strategy still faces multiple challenges. Most investigations of MSC-based therapeutic approaches are focused on evaluating the safety and efficacy, while the formulation, route of administration, dose, and frequency of MSC remain to be defined. In addition, whether MSC transplantation is effective only for a certain number of disease phenotypes is not known since MSC transplantation has not shown significant benefits in refractory RA. Moreover, although MSCs are reported to exert the significant immunosuppression on T cells in presence of strong inflammation, less inflammation milieu may weaken the suppression of MSCs on T cells, even promote T-cell responses. Likewise, adoptive Tregs therapy has similar shortcomings such as the probability of conversion into pathogenic cells.¹⁸⁹ Lack of specific antigen on the surface of Tregs also makes it difficult to purify Tregs and thus increases the risk of contamination with T_eff. As for CAR-based therapy, a major barrier in the CAR design for autoimmune therapy is the relative scarcity of cell-surface tissue-specific antigens since it is difficult to find proper specific antigens that target interested cells in autoimmune diseases. Stability, durability, safety, effectiveness, manufacturing, and persistence must be confirmed for CAR-T therapy to apply in clinic.

Footnotes

Author contribution(s)

Yu-jing Li: Investigation; Methodology; Writing – original draft.

Zhu Chen: Conceptualization; Investigation; Supervision; Writing – review & editing.

ORCID iD

Zhu Chen

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81871227 and 81501344).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Okamoto

Nakashima

Shinohara

, et al. Osteoimmunology: the conceptual framework unifying the immune and skeletal systems. Physiol Rev 2017; 97: 1295–1349.

Aletaha

Smolen

JS.

Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis: a review. JAMA 2018; 320: 1360–1372.

Huang

Chen

, et al. Promising therapeutic targets for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 686155.

Barnas

Looney

Anolik

JH.

B cell targeted therapies in autoimmune disease. Curr Opin Immunol 2019; 61: 92–99.

Lin

Anzaghe

Schulke

Update on the pathomechanism, diagnosis, and treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis. Cells 2020; 9: 880.

Nygaard

Firestein

GS.

Restoring synovial homeostasis in rheumatoid arthritis by targeting fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2020; 16: 316–333.

van Vollenhoven

. Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis – are we there yet? Nat Rev Rheumatol 2019; 15: 180–186.

Becede

Alasti

Gessl

, et al. Risk profiling for a refractory course of rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49: 211–217.

Lopez-Santalla

Bueren

Garin

MI.

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-based therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an update on preclinical studies. EBioMedicine 2021; 69: 103427.

10.

Cheung

McInnes

IB.

Future therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis?

Semin Immunopathol 2017; 39: 487–500.

11.

Luo

, et al. Human gingival tissue-derived MSC suppress osteoclastogenesis and bone erosion via CD39-adenosine signal pathway in autoimmune arthritis. EBioMedicine 2019; 43: 620–631.

12.

Liu

Zhao

Tan

, et al. Cell therapies for refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2018; 36: 911–919.

13.

Sarsenova

Issabekova

Abisheva

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 11592.

14.

Lopez-Santalla

Fernandez-Perez

Garin

MI.

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells for rheumatoid arthritis treatment: an update on clinical applications. Cells 2020; 9: 1852.

15.

Hwang

Rim

Nam

, et al. Recent developments in clinical applications of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 631291.

16.

Wang

Zou

, et al. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell therapy for regenerative treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: opportunities and challenges. Drug Des Devel Ther 2021; 15: 3927–3936.

17.

Zhang

Wang

Yuan

, et al. In vitro elimination of autoreactive B cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients by universal chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 80: 176–184.

18.

Dall’Era

Pauli

Remedios

, et al. Adoptive Treg cell therapy in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 71: 431–440.

19.

Brunstein

Miller

McKenna

, et al. Umbilical cord blood-derived T regulatory cells to prevent GVHD: kinetics, toxicity profile, and clinical effect. Blood 2016; 127: 1044–1051.

20.

Wang

Shao

Jiao

, et al. The Th17/Treg imbalance and cytokine environment in peripheral blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2012; 32: 887–893.

21.

Lucas

Perdriger

Ame

Definition of B cell helper T cells in rheumatoid arthritis and their behavior during treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 50: 867–872.

22.

Zhong

Zhao

Liu

, et al. IL-22-producing CD4+T cells in the treatment response of rheumatoid arthritis to combination therapy with methotrexate and leflunomide. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 41143.

23.

Sun

Yang

Huo

, et al. Efficient therapeutic function and mechanisms of human polyclonal CD8(+)CD103(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells on collagen-induced arthritis in mice. J Immunol Res 2019; 2019: 8575407.

24.

Park

Yang

, et al. A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17. Nat Immunol 2005; 6: 1133–1141.

25.

Koenders

van den Berg

WB.

Translational mini-review series on Th17 cells: are T helper 17 cells really pathogenic in autoimmunity?

Clin Exp Immunol 2010; 159: 131–136.

26.

Fukui

Iwamoto

Takatani

, et al. M1 and M2 monocytes in rheumatoid arthritis: a contribution of imbalance of M1/M2 monocytes to osteoclastogenesis. Front Immunol 2017; 8: 1958.

27.

Yang

Guo

Wang

, et al. Targeted silver nanoparticles for rheumatoid arthritis therapy via macrophage apoptosis and re-polarization. Biomaterials 2021; 264: 120390.

28.

Hui

Cao

, et al. Butyrate inhibit collagen-induced arthritis via Treg/IL-10/Th17 axis. Int Immunopharmacol 2019; 68: 226–233.

29.

Tardito

Martinelli

Soldano

, et al. Macrophage M1/M2 polarization and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Autoimmun Rev 2019; 18: 102397.

30.

Van Raemdonck

Umar

Palasiewicz

, et al. CCL21/CCR7 signaling in macrophages promotes joint inflammation and Th17-mediated osteoclast formation in rheumatoid arthritis. Cell Mol Life Sci 2020; 77: 1387–1399.

31.

Laan

Cui

Hoshino

, et al. Neutrophil recruitment by human IL-17 via C-X-C chemokine release in the airways. J Immunol 1999; 162: 2347–2352.

32.

Takayanagi

Osteoimmunology: shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems. Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7: 292–304.

33.

Cho

Chen

Ding

, et al. PMSA prevents osteoclastogenesis and estrogen-dependent bone loss in mice. Bone 2021; 142: 115707.

34.

Mizuno

Kanno

Hoshi

, et al. Transgenic mice overexpressing soluble osteoclast differentiation factor (sODF) exhibit severe osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 2002; 20: 337–344.

35.

Negishi-Koga

Shinohara

Komatsu

, et al. Suppression of bone formation by osteoclastic expression of semaphorin 4D. Nat Med 2011; 17: 1473–1480.

36.

Pickens

Volin

Mandelin

, et al. IL-17 contributes to angiogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol 2010; 184: 3233–3241.

37.

Yang

Qian

Zhang

, et al. Th17 cell pathogenicity and plasticity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Leukoc Biol 2019; 106: 1233–1240.

38.

Hou

, et al. Diagnostic values of serum IL-10 and IL-17 in rheumatoid arthritis and their correlation with serum 14-3-3eta protein. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2019; 23: 1899–1906.

39.

Chen

Bozec

Ramming

, et al. Anti-inflammatory and immune-regulatory cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2019; 15: 9–17.

40.

Lubberts

Joosten

Chabaud

, et al. IL-4 gene therapy for collagen arthritis suppresses synovial IL-17 and osteoprotegerin ligand and prevents bone erosion. J Clin Invest 2000; 105: 1697–1710.

41.

Haikal

Abdeltawab

Rashed

, et al. Combination therapy of mesenchymal stromal cells and interleukin-4 attenuates rheumatoid arthritis in a collagen-induced murine model. Cells 2019; 8: 823.

42.

Dey

Fischer

Dragon

, et al. Culture and characterization of various porcine integumentary-connective tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells to facilitate tissue adhesion to percutaneous metal implants. Stem Cell Res Ther 2021; 12: 604.

43.

The immunoregulation of mesenchymal stem cells plays a critical role in improving the prognosis of liver transplantation. J Transl Med 2019; 17: 412.

44.

Meisel

Zibert

Laryea

, et al. Human bone marrow stromal cells inhibit allogeneic T-cell responses by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-mediated tryptophan degradation. Blood 2004; 103: 4619–4621.

45.

Boberg

von Bahr

Afram

, et al. Treatment of chronic GvHD with mesenchymal stromal cells induces durable responses: a phase II study. Stem Cells Transl Med 2020; 9: 1190–1202.

46.

Soontararak

Chow

Johnson

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) equivalent to adipose-derived MSC in promoting intestinal healing and microbiome normalization in mouse inflammatory bowel disease model. Stem Cells Transl Med 2018; 7: 456–467.

47.

Saad

Dietz

Herrmann

SMS

, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells increase cortical perfusion in renovascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 28: 2777–2785.

48.

Saldana

Bensiamar

Valles

, et al. Immunoregulatory potential of mesenchymal stem cells following activation by macrophage-derived soluble factors. Stem Cell Res Ther 2019; 10: 58.

49.

Moravej

Geramizadeh

Azarpira

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells increase skin graft survival time and up-regulate PD-L1 expression in splenocytes of mice. Immunol Lett 2017; 182: 39–49.

50.

Wei

Crawford

, et al. Immunoregulatory role of exosomes derived from differentiating mesenchymal stromal cells on inflammation and osteogenesis. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2019; 13: 1978–1991.

51.

Ren

Hou

Yang

, et al. Extracellular vesicles secreted by hypoxia pre-challenged mesenchymal stem cells promote non-small cell lung cancer cell growth and mobility as well as macrophage M2 polarization via miR-21-5p delivery. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2019; 38: 62.

52.

Qian

Cao

Naturally occurring CD1c+ human regulatory dendritic cells: immunoregulators that are expanded in response to E. Eur J Immunol 2012; 42: 1388–1392.

53.

Yuan

Qin

Wang

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy induces FLT3L and CD1c(+) dendritic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Nat Commun 2019; 10: 2498.

54.

Huang

Cheng

Wang

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells and their secreted molecules predominantly ameliorate fulminant hepatic failure and chronic liver fibrosis in mice respectively. J Transl Med 2016; 14: 45.

55.

Yoshizumi

Yukawa

Iwaki

, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of adipose tissue-derived stem cells on concanavalin A-induced acute liver injury in mice. Cell Med 2017; 9: 21–33.

56.

Dokic

Tomic

Markovic

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from periapical lesions modulate differentiation and functional properties of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol 2013; 43: 1862–1872.

57.

Tang

Liu

, et al. The therapeutic effect of ICAM-1-overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells on acute graft-versus-host disease. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018; 46: 2624–2635.

58.

Wang

Ding

, et al. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 enhances the therapeutic effects of MSCs in a dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis models by promoting MSCs homing to murine colons and spleens. Stem Cell Res Ther 2019; 10: 267.

59.

Das

Bergen

Koudstaal

, et al. DNGR1-mediated deletion of A20/Tnfaip3 in dendritic cells alters T and B-cell homeostasis and promotes autoimmune liver pathology. J Autoimmun 2019; 102: 167–178.

60.

Dang

Yang

Zhang

, et al. A20 plays a critical role in the immunoregulatory function of mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Mol Med 2016; 20: 1550–1560.

61.

Liu

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-originated exosomal lncRNA HAND2-AS1 impairs rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocyte activation through miR-143-3p/TNFAIP3/NF-kappaB pathway. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16: 116.

62.

Montesinos

Lopez-Garcia

Cortes-Morales

, et al. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells exposed to an inflammatory environment increase the expression of ICAM-1 and release microvesicles enriched in this adhesive molecule: analysis of the participation of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma. J Immunol Res 2020; 2020: 8839625.

63.

Lavini-Ramos

Silva

Soares-Schanoski

, et al. MMP9 integrates multiple immunoregulatory pathways that discriminate high suppressive activity of human mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 874.

64.

Han

Yang

Lin

, et al. Interleukin-17 enhances immunosuppression by mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Differ 2014; 21: 1758–1768.

65.

Dong

Zhu

Tamada

, et al. B7-H1, a third member of the B7 family, co-stimulates T-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat Med 1999; 5: 1365–1369.

66.

Xiao

Zeng

, et al. B7-H1 promotes the functional effect of human gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells on collagen-induced arthritis murine model. Mol Ther 2020; 28: 2417–2429.

67.

Court

Le-Gatt

Luz-Crawford

, et al. Mitochondrial transfer from MSCs to T cells induces Treg differentiation and restricts inflammatory response. EMBO Rep 2020; 21: e48052.

68.

Corcione

Benvenuto

Ferretti

, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate B-cell functions. Blood 2006; 107: 367–372.

69.

Cho

Lee

Kim

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate B-cell-mediated immune responses and increase IL-10-expressing regulatory B cells in an EBI3-dependent manner. Cell Mol Immunol 2017; 14: 895–908.

70.

Harrell

Jovicic

Djonov

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes and other extracellular vesicles as new remedies in the therapy of inflammatory diseases. Cells 2019; 8: 1605.

71.

Wang

Thomsen

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles and bone regeneration. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2021; 128: 18–36.

72.

Liu

Zhang

, et al. Tissue-engineered bone immobilized with human adipose stem cells-derived exosomes promotes bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018; 10: 5240–5254.

73.

Kuhn

Liu

Boyd

, et al. Developmental-like bone regeneration by human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal cells. Tissue Eng Part A 2014; 20: 365–377.

74.

Wang

Han

Sun

, et al. Osteogenic and angiogenic lineage differentiated adipose-derived stem cells for bone regeneration of calvarial defects in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res A 2021; 109: 538–550.

75.

Gjerde

Mustafa

Hellem

, et al. Cell therapy induced regeneration of severely atrophied mandibular bone in a clinical trial. Stem Cell Res Ther 2018; 9: 213.

76.

Yuan

Shao

, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from starving BMSCs enhance survival of chondrocyte aggregates in grafts by attenuating chondrocyte apoptosis and enabling stable cartilage regeneration for craniofacial reconstruction. Acta Biomater 2022; 140: 659–673.

77.

Takeuchi

Katagiri

Endo

, et al. Exosomes from conditioned media of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote bone regeneration by enhancing angiogenesis. PLoS ONE 2019; 14: e0225472.

78.

Huang

Wang

, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes promote rotator cuff tendon-bone healing by promoting angiogenesis and regulating M1 macrophages in rats. Stem Cell Res Ther 2020; 11: 496.

79.

Fan

Lee

Kim

, et al. Generation of small RNA-modulated exosome mimetics for bone regeneration. ACS Nano 2020; 14: 11973–11984.

80.

Joeng

Long

The Gli2 transcriptional activator is a crucial effector for Ihh signaling in osteoblast development and cartilage vascularization. Development 2009; 136: 4177–4185.

81.

Zou

Chen

Wang

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing Ihh promote bone repair. J Orthop Surg Res 2014; 9: 102.

82.

Lin

Yang

Wang

, et al. AP2a enhanced the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by inhibiting the formation of YAP/RUNX2 complex and BARX1 transcription. Cell Prolif 2019; 52: e12522.

83.

Zhao

Tickner

, et al. The role of SATB2 in skeletogenesis and human disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2014; 25: 35–44.

84.

Chen

Zheng

Zhang

, et al. Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (Satb2) synergizes with Bmp9 and is essential for osteo/odontogenic differentiation of mouse incisor mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif 2021; 54: e13016.

85.

Sonomoto

Yamaoka

Oshita

, et al. Interleukin-1beta induces differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts via the Wnt-5a/receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 pathway. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 3355–3363.

86.

Liu

Guo

Shi

, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles promote periodontal regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A 2021; 27: 962–976.

87.

Chu

Wang

, et al. Frequent injections of high-dose human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells slightly aggravate arthritis and skeletal muscle cachexia in collagen-induced arthritic mice. Exp Ther Med 2021; 22: 1272.

88.

Zhai

Dong

Zhang

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance therapeutic effect and prevent adverse gastrointestinal reaction of methotrexate treatment in collagen-induced arthritis. Stem Cells Int 2021; 2021: 8850820.

89.

Nam

Jung

Rim

, et al. Intraperitoneal infusion of mesenchymal stem cell attenuates severity of collagen antibody induced arthritis. PLoS ONE 2018; 13: e0198740.

90.

Shu

Pan

Huang

, et al. Transplantation of human amnion mesenchymal cells attenuates the disease development in rats with collagen-induced arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015; 33: 484–490.

91.

Fan

, et al. Human umbilical mesenchymal stem cells display therapeutic potential in rheumatoid arthritis by regulating interactions between immunity and gut microbiota via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020; 8: 131.

92.

Abdelmawgoud

Saleh

Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells in a rheumatoid arthritis rat model. Adv Clin Exp Med 2018; 27: 873–880.

93.

Wang

Yang

Zhu

, et al. Comparative study of methotrexate and human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2018; 32: 599–605.

94.

Liu

Zhang

, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells inhibited T follicular helper cell generation in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 12777.

95.

Roudsari

Alavi-Moghadam

Rezaei-Tavirani

, et al. The outcome of stem cell-based therapies on the immune responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Exp Med Biol 2021; 1326: 159–186.

96.

Gao

Zhang

, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells improve bone erosion in collagen-induced arthritis by inhibiting osteoclasia-related factors and differentiating into chondrocytes. Stem Cell Res Ther 2020; 11: 171.

97.

Gao

Dang

, et al. Cervus and cucumis peptides combined umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Medicine 2020; 99: e21222.

98.

Ghoryani

Shariati-Sarabi

Tavakkol-Afshari

, et al. The sufficient immunoregulatory effect of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on regulatory T cells in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol Res 2020; 2020: 3562753.

99.

Alvaro-Gracia

Jover

Garcia-Vicuna

, et al. Intravenous administration of expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in refractory rheumatoid arthritis (Cx611): results of a multicentre, dose escalation, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase Ib/IIa clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76: 196–202.

100.

Shadmanfar

Labibzadeh

Emadedin

, et al. Intra-articular knee implantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in rheumatoid arthritis patients with knee involvement: results of a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 clinical trial. Cytotherapy 2018; 20: 499–506.

101.

Wang

Huang

, et al. Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell therapy for rheumatoid arthritis patients: a prospective phase I/II study. Drug Des Devel Ther 2019; 13: 4331–4340.

102.

Ghoryani

Shariati-Sarabi

Tavakkol-Afshari

, et al. Amelioration of clinical symptoms of patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis following treatment with autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: a successful clinical trial in Iran. Biomed Pharmacother 2019; 109: 1834–1840.

103.

Wang

Cong

, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell therapy for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: safety and efficacy. Stem Cells Dev 2013; 22: 3192–3202.

104.

Yang

Zhao

, et al. Serum IFN-gamma levels predict the therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in active rheumatoid arthritis. J Transl Med 2018; 16: 165.

105.

Pedrosa

Gomes

Laranjeira

, et al. Immunomodulatory effect of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells on peripheral blood T cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2020; 14: 16–28.

106.

Park

Lim

Lee

, et al. Intravenous infusion of umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in rheumatoid arthritis: a phase Ia clinical trial. Stem Cells Transl Med 2018; 7: 636–642.

107.

Gowhari Shabgah

Shariati-Sarabi

Tavakkol-Afshari

, et al. A significant decrease of BAFF, APRIL, and BAFF receptors following mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Gene 2020; 732: 144336.

108.

Yang

Yao

, et al. Combination of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem (stromal) cell transplantation with IFN-gamma treatment synergistically improves the clinical outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79: 1298–1304.

109.

Fontenot

Gavin

Rudensky

AY.

Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol 2003; 4: 330–336.

110.

Morgan

Flierman

van Duivenvoorde

, et al. Effective treatment of collagen-induced arthritis by adoptive transfer of CD25+ regulatory T cells. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 2212–2221.

111.

Sakaguchi

Asano

, et al. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol 1995; 155: 1151–1164.

112.

Morgan

Sutmuller

Witteveen

, et al. CD25+ cell depletion hastens the onset of severe disease in collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 1452–1460.

113.

Zhang

Kasagi

, et al. Manipulating regulatory T cells: a promising strategy to treat autoimmunity. Immunotherapy 2015; 7: 1201–1211.

114.

Rosenzwajg

Lorenzon

Cacoub

, et al. Immunological and clinical effects of low-dose interleukin-2 across 11 autoimmune diseases in a single, open clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78: 209–217.

115.

Hippen

Merkel

Schirm

, et al. Generation and large-scale expansion of human inducible regulatory T cells that suppress graft-versus-host disease. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 1148–1157.

116.

Kohm

Carpentier

Anger

, et al. Cutting edge: CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress antigen-specific autoreactive immune responses and central nervous system inflammation during active experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol 2002; 169: 4712–4716.

117.

Tarbell

Petit

Zuo

, et al. Dendritic cell-expanded, islet-specific CD4+ CD25+ CD62L+ regulatory T cells restore normoglycemia in diabetic NOD mice. J Exp Med 2007; 204: 191–201.

118.

Steiner

Auto-antibodies and autoreactive T-cells in rheumatoid arthritis: pathogenetic players and diagnostic tools. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2007; 32: 23–36.

119.

Miao

Zhu

Functional defects of Treg cells: new targets in rheumatic diseases, including ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2018; 20: 30.

120.

Toor

Murshed

Al-Dhaheri

, et al. Immune checkpoints in circulating and tumor-infiltrating CD4(+) T cell subsets in colorectal cancer patients. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 2936.

121.

Kim

Park

Son

, et al. Tumor microenvironment dictates regulatory T cell phenotype: upregulated immune checkpoints reinforce suppressive function. J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7: 339.

122.

Jafari

Molavi

Kahroba

, et al. Clinical application of immune checkpoints in targeted immunotherapy of prostate cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci 2020; 77: 3693–3710.

123.

Maruhashi

Okazaki

Sugiura

, et al. LAG-3 inhibits the activation of CD4(+) T cells that recognize stable pMHCII through its conformation-dependent recognition of pMHCII. Nat Immunol 2018; 19: 1415–1426.

124.

Tekguc

Wing

Osaki

, et al. Treg-expressed CTLA-4 depletes CD80/CD86 by trogocytosis, releasing free PD-L1 on antigen-presenting cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2021; 118: e2023739118.

125.

Frank

Reagan

Bartlett

, et al. In situ vaccination with a TLR9 agonist and local low-dose radiation induces systemic responses in untreated indolent lymphoma. Cancer Discov 2018; 8: 1258–1269.

126.

Chen

Felix

Wang

Immune regulation through mitochondrion-dependent dendritic cell death induced by T regulatory cells. J Immunol 2011; 187: 5684–5692.

127.

Yang

Fan

, et al. Tolerogenic splenic IDO (+) dendritic cells from the mice treated with induced-Treg cells suppress collagen-induced arthritis. J Immunol Res 2014; 2014: 831054.

128.

Le Mercier

Chen

Lines

, et al. VISTA regulates the development of protective antitumor immunity. Cancer Res 2014; 74: 1933–1944.

129.

Kondo

Ohno

Nishii

, et al. Differential contribution of three immune checkpoint (VISTA, CTLA-4, PD-1) pathways to antitumor responses against squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2016; 57: 54–60.

130.

Yeh

Gong

Kamitani

Ubiquitin-like proteins: new wines in new bottles. Gene 2000; 248: 1–14.

131.

Lao

Teng

, et al. SENP3 maintains the stability and function of regulatory T cells via BACH2 deSUMOylation. Nat Commun 2018; 9: 3157.

132.

Turner

Stephen-Victor

Wang

, et al. Regulatory T cell-derived TGF-beta1 controls multiple checkpoints governing allergy and autoimmunity. Immunity 2020; 53: 1202–1214.e1206.

133.

Shi

, et al. Foxo4- and Stat3-dependent IL-10 production by progranulin in regulatory T cells restrains inflammatory arthritis. FASEB J 2017; 31: 1354–1367.

134.

Miyara

Ito

Sakaguchi

TREG-cell therapies for autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2014; 10: 543–551.

135.

Voskens

Stoica

Roessner

, et al. Safety and tolerability of a single infusion of autologous ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells in adults with ulcerative colitis (ER-TREG 01): protocol of a phase 1, open-label, fast-track dose-escalation clinical trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e049208.

136.

Tanaka

Zhang

Yang

, et al. Successful immunotherapy of autoimmune cholangitis by adoptive transfer of forkhead box protein 3(+) regulatory T cells. Clin Exp Immunol 2014; 178: 253–261.

137.

Scalapino

Daikh

DI.

Suppression of glomerulonephritis in NZB/NZW lupus prone mice by adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e6031.

138.

Bluestone

Buckner

Fitch

, et al. Type 1 diabetes immunotherapy using polyclonal regulatory T cells. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7: 315ra189.

139.

Wright

Stauss

Ehrenstein

MR.

Therapeutic potential of Tregs to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Immunol 2011; 23: 195–201.

140.

Safinia

Leech

Hernandez-Fuentes

, et al. Promoting transplantation tolerance; adoptive regulatory T cell therapy. Clin Exp Immunol 2013; 172: 158–168.

141.

Shitara

Nishikawa

Regulatory T cells: a potential target in cancer immunotherapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2018; 1417: 104–115.

142.

McGovern

Wright

Stauss

HJ.

Engineering specificity and function of therapeutic regulatory T cells. Front Immunol 2017; 8: 1517.

143.

Rudensky

AY.

T cell receptor signalling in the control of regulatory T cell differentiation and function. Nat Rev Immunol 2016; 16: 220–233.

144.

Wright

Notley

Xue

, et al. Adoptive therapy with redirected primary regulatory T cells results in antigen-specific suppression of arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 19078–19083.

145.

van Loenen

de Boer

Amir

, et al. Mixed T cell receptor dimers harbor potentially harmful neoreactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 10972–10977.

146.

Sun

Hou

Gong

, et al. Adoptive induced antigen-specific Treg cells reverse inflammation in collagen-induced arthritis mouse model. Inflammation 2018; 41: 485–495.

147.

Asnagli

Martire

Belmonte

, et al. Type 1 regulatory T cells specific for collagen type II as an efficient cell-based therapy in arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2014; 16: R115.

148.

Kim

Cha

Joo

, et al. Targeting the epitope spreader Pep19 by naive human CD45RA(+) regulatory T cells dictates a distinct suppressive T cell fate in a novel form of immunotherapy. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017; 47: 292–311.

149.

Zonneveld-Huijssoon

Roord

de Jager

, et al. Bystander suppression of experimental arthritis by nasal administration of a heat shock protein peptide. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 2199–2206.

150.

Kwon

Cha

Jeong

, et al. Pep19 drives epitope spreading in periodontitis and periodontitis-associated autoimmune diseases. J Periodontal Res 2016; 51: 381–394.

151.

Mosanya

Isaacs

JD.

Tolerising cellular therapies: what is their promise for autoimmune disease?

Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78: 297–310.

152.

Zavvar

Abdolmaleki

Farajifard

, et al. Collagen II-primed Foxp3 transduced T cells ameliorate collagen-induced arthritis in rats: the effect of antigenic priming on T regulatory cell function. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018; 17: 361–371.

153.

Smeets

van Rijssen

, et al. Single CD28 stimulation induces stable and polyclonal expansion of human regulatory T cells. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 43003.

154.

Beyersdorf

Hanke

Kerkau

, et al. CD28 superagonists put a break on autoimmunity by preferentially activating CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Autoimmun Rev 2006; 5: 40–45.

155.

Yang

Liu

Yang

, et al. Adoptive cell therapy of induced regulatory T cells expanded by tolerogenic dendritic cells on murine autoimmune arthritis. J Immunol Res 2017; 2017: 7573154.

156.

Charbonnier

Han

Quentin

, et al. Adoptive transfer of IL-10-secreting CD4+CD49b+ regulatory T cells suppresses ongoing arthritis. J Autoimmun 2010; 34: 390–399.

157.

Aricha

Reuveni

Fuchs

, et al. Suppression of experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis by autologous T regulatory cells. J Autoimmun 2016; 67: 57–64.

158.

Haque

Lei

Xiong

, et al. FoxP3 and Bcl-xL cooperatively promote regulatory T cell persistence and prevention of arthritis development. Arthritis Res Ther 2010; 12: R66.

159.

Chen

Hsu

Chen

, et al. Lymphocyte-activation gene 3(+) (LAG3(+)) forkhead box protein 3(-) (FOXP3(-)) regulatory T cells induced by B cells alleviates joint inflammation in collagen-induced arthritis. J Autoimmun 2016; 68: 75–85.

160.

Hsu

Chu

, et al. A B-1a cell subset induces Foxp3(-) T cells with regulatory activity through an IL-10-independent pathway. Cell Mol Immunol 2015; 12: 354–365.

161.

Haque

Fino

Sandhu

, et al. Development of stem cell-derived antigen-specific regulatory T cells against autoimmunity. J Vis Exp 2016; 117: 54720.

162.

Santinon

Batignes

Mebrek

, et al. Involvement of tumor necrosis factor receptor type II in FoxP3 stability and as a marker of Treg cells specifically expanded by anti-tumor necrosis factor treatments in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020; 72: 576–587.

163.

Tseng

Huang

Clanchy

, et al. TNF receptor 2 signaling prevents DNA methylation at the Foxp3 promoter and prevents pathogenic conversion of regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019; 116: 21666–21672.

164.

Fleskens

Minutti

, et al. Nemo-like kinase drives Foxp3 stability and is critical for maintenance of immune tolerance by regulatory T cells. Cell Rep 2019; 26: 3600–3612.e3606.

165.

Safari

Farajnia

Arya

, et al. CRISPR and personalized Treg therapy: new insights into the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2018; 40: 201–211.

166.

Becker

Kubach

Wijdenes

, et al. CD4-mediated functional activation of human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Eur J Immunol 2007; 37: 1217–1223.

167.

van Vollenhoven

Keystone

Strand

, et al. Efficacy and safety of tregalizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase IIb, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77: 495–499.

168.

June

Sadelain

Chimeric antigen receptor therapy. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 64–73.

169.

Rosenberg

Restifo

NP.

Adoptive cell transfer as personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. Science 2015; 348: 62–68.

170.

Jin

, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Mol Immunol 2021; 18: 1896–1903.

171.

Ellebrecht

Bhoj

Nace

, et al. Reengineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells for targeted therapy of autoimmune disease. Science 2016; 353: 179–184.

172.

Santamaria-Alza

Vasquez

Are chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) the future in immunotherapy for autoimmune diseases?

Inflamm Res 2021; 70: 651–663.

173.

Chen

Sun

Liu

, et al. Immunotherapy deriving from CAR-T cell treatment in autoimmune diseases. J Immunol Res 2019; 2019: 5727516.

174.

Zmievskaya

Valiullina

Ganeeva

, et al. Application of CAR-T cell therapy beyond oncology: autoimmune diseases and viral infections. Biomedicines 2021; 9: 59.

175.

Boroughs

Larson

Choi

, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor costimulation domains modulate human regulatory T cell function. JCI Insight 2019; 5: e126194.

176.

Kobayashi

Thelin

Parrish

, et al. A biomimetic five-module chimeric antigen receptor ((5M)CAR) designed to target and eliminate antigen-specific T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020; 117: 28950–28959.

177.

Simone

Daniel

Schloot

, et al. T cell receptor restriction of diabetogenic autoimmune NOD T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 2518–2521.

178.

Zhang

Crawford

, et al. Monoclonal antibody blocking the recognition of an insulin peptide-MHC complex modulates type 1 diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 2656–2661.

179.

Zhang

Sosinowski

Cox

, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting a pathogenic MHC class II:peptide complex modulate the progression of autoimmune diabetes. J Autoimmun 2019; 96: 50–58.

180.

Mei

Schmidt

Dorner

Rationale of anti-CD19 immunotherapy: an option to target autoreactive plasma cells in autoimmunity. Arthritis Res Ther 2012; 14(Suppl. 5): S1.

181.

Kansal

Richardson

Neeli

, et al. Sustained B cell depletion by CD19-targeted CAR T cells is a highly effective treatment for murine lupus. Sci Transl Med 2019; 11: eaav1648.

182.

Elinav

Adam

Waks

, et al. Amelioration of colitis by genetically engineered murine regulatory T cells redirected by antigen-specific chimeric receptor. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 1721–1731.

183.

Blat

Zigmond

Alteber

, et al. Suppression of murine colitis and its associated cancer by carcinoembryonic antigen-specific regulatory T cells. Mol Ther 2014; 22: 1018–1028.

184.

Fransson

Piras

Burman

, et al. CAR/FoxP3-engineered T regulatory cells target the CNS and suppress EAE upon intranasal delivery. J Neuroinflammation 2012; 9: 112.

185.

Tenspolde

Zimmermann

Weber

, et al. Regulatory T cells engineered with a novel insulin-specific chimeric antigen receptor as a candidate immunotherapy for type 1 diabetes. J Autoimmun 2019; 103: 102289.

186.

Birkle

Gao

Zeng

, et al. Down-regulation of GD3 ganglioside and its O-acetylated derivative by stable transfection with antisense vector against GD3-synthase gene expression in hamster melanoma cells: effects on cellular growth, melanogenesis, and dendricity. J Neurochem 2000; 74: 547–554.

187.

Mukhatayev

Dellacecca

Cosgrove

, et al. Antigen specificity enhances disease control by Tregs in vitiligo. Front Immunol 2020; 11: 581433.

188.

Schwenzer

Jiang

Mikuls

, et al. Identification of an immunodominant peptide from citrullinated tenascin-C as a major target for autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75: 1876–1883.

189.

Zhou

Bailey-Bucktrout

Jeker

, et al. Instability of the transcription factor Foxp3 leads to the generation of pathogenic memory T cells in vivo. Nat Immunol 2009; 10: 1000–1007.

Cell-based therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: opportunities and challenges

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Dysregulated immune homeostasis in RA

MSC transplantation

Immunoregulatory effects of MSC

Capacity of MSC in bone and cartilage regeneration

MSC transplantation in RA

Adoptive regulatory T cells immunotherapy

Effects of Tregs on immune modulation

Adoptive Treg cells immunotherapy in arthritis

Obtaining antigen-specific Tregs

Expansion of antigen-specific Tregs

Emerging CAR-T cells in the treatment of RA

CAR-T and autoimmune diseases

CAR-T in RA

Perspective and challenges

Footnotes

Author contribution(s)

ORCID iD

Funding

Conflict of interest statement

References