Using meaningful activities as a treatment modality is characteristic of occupation-based intervention (OBI). The benefits of OBI have been described, but not the effectiveness thereof. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of OBI in relation to the type, commencement, duration and outcomes as reported in literature.
Methods
A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted, including EBSCOHost, PubMed, Cochrane Register for Controlled Trials, Web of Science, OTSeeker, PEDro and Google Scholar. Search terms included ‘occupation-based’, ‘occupation-centered’, ‘intervention’, ‘upper limb’ and ‘outcome measures’. Studies including OBI for neurological or paediatric cases were excluded.
Results
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Using the PEDro scale, three of the studies, all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), were viewed as high quality, one of fair and one of poor quality. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, a meta-analysis was not possible, and a narrative synthesis is presented. Five studies used interviewing together with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) to determine the client’s occupational profile when choosing meaningful activities. The commencement and duration of OBI varied amongst the studies, and a variety of outcome measures were used to determine the effectiveness of OBI.
Discussion
OBI used together with biomechanical approaches shows promising effectiveness. Outcome measures such as the COPM and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) that measure activity and participation, should be employed in client-centered practice. More robust scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of OBI is needed.
Che DaudAZYauMKBarnettF, et al.Integration of occupation based intervention in hand injury rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Ther2016; 29(1): 30–40.
2.
NaughtonNAlgarL. Linking commonly used hand therapy outcome measures to individual areas of the International classification of functioning: a systematic review. J Hand Ther2019; 32(2): 243–261.
3.
LesherDAMMulcaheyMJHersheyP, et al.Alignment of outcome instruments used in hand therapy with the occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a scoping review. Am J Occup Ther2017; 71(1): 7101190060p1–7101190060p12.
4.
FisherAG. Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: same, same or different?Scand J Occup Ther2014; 21: 96–107.
5.
DaudAZCYauMKBarnettF. A consensus definition of occupation-based intervention from a Malaysian perspective–A Dephi study. Br J Occup Ther2015; 78(11): 697–705.
6.
ValdesKNaughtonNAlgarL. ICF components of outcome measures for mallet finger: a systematic review. J Hand Ther2016; 29(4): 388–395.
7.
de KlerkSBadenhorstEButtleA. Occupation-based hand therapy in South Africa: challenges and opportunities. South Afr J Occup Ther2016; 46(3): 10–15.
8.
de KlerkSBuchananHJerosch-HeroldC. The validity and clinical utility of the disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand questionnaire for hand injuries in developing country contexts: a systematic review. J Hand Ther2018; 31(1): 80–90.e1.
9.
Toth-FejelGEToth-FejelGFHedricksCA. Occupation-centered practice in hand rehabilitation using the experience sampling method. Am J Occup Ther1998; 52(5): 381–385.
10.
ColaianniDProvidentI. The benefits of and challenges to the use of occupation in hand therapy. Occup Ther Health Care2010; 24(2): 130–146.
11.
AminiD. Renaissance occupational therapy and occupation-based hand therapy [Internet]. OT Practice2004. Available from:www.aota.org.
12.
RobinsonLSBrownTO’BrienL. Embracing an occupational perspective: occupation-based interventions in hand therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J2016; 63(4): 293–296.
13.
ColaianniDJProvidentIDiBartolaLM, et al.A phenomenology of occupation-based hand therapy. Aust Occup Ther J2015; 62(3): 177–186.
14.
CorrSSiddonsL. An introduction to the selection of outcome measures. Br J Occup Ther2005; 68(5): 202–206.
15.
Weinstock-ZlotnickGMehtaSP. A systematic review of the benefits of occupation-based intervention for patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. J Hand Ther2019; 32(2): 141–152.
16.
PowellRKvon der HeydeRL. The inclusion of activities of daily living in flexor tendon rehabilitation: a survey. J Hand Ther2014; 27(1): 23–29.
17.
StapletonTMcBreartyC. Use of standardised assessments and outcome measures among a sample of irish occupational therapists working with adults with physical disabilities. Br J Occup Ther2009; 72(2): 55–64.
18.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol2009; 62(10): 1006–1012.
MaherCGSheeringtonCHerbertRD, et al.Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. (research report). Phys Ther2003; 83(8): 713–721.
22.
MoreiraRFoltranFAlbuquerque-SendínF, et al.Comparison of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials evidence regarding the effectiveness of workplace exercise on musculoskeletal pain control. Work2012; 41(Suppl 1): 4782–4789.
HansenAØKristensenHKCederlundR, et al.An occupation-based intervention in patients with hand-related disorders grouped using the sense of coherence scale—A randomized controlled trial. J Hand Ther2020; 33(4): 455–469.
25.
RostamiHRAkbarfahimiMHassani MehrabanA, et al.Occupation-based intervention versus rote exercise in modified constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with median and ulnar nerve injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2017; 31(8): 1087–1097.
26.
MeierJ. Comparing occupation based intervention with traditional therapy for patients with de quervain’s disease. Master’s thesis. South Africa: University of Witwatersrand, 2019.
27.
BaptistaMKugelJJavaherianH, et al.Functional outcomes of a community occupation-based hand therapy class for older adults. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr2018; 36(4): 380–398.
28.
EarleyDShannonM. The use of occupation-based treatment with a person who has shoulder adhesive capsulitis: a case report. Am J Occup Ther2006; 60(4): 397–403.
29.
YoungWDayaMGovenderP. Functional outcome using early controlled active motion in rehabilitation of a replanted hand: a case report. J Hand Ther2019; 33: 426–434.
30.
FinleyWPVan LewS. Occupational therapy for nonoperative four-part proximal humerus fracture: a case report. Am J Occup Ther2018; 72(3): 7203210010p1.
31.
JackJEstesRI. Documenting progress: hand therapy treatment shift from biomechanical to occupational adaptation. Am J Occup Ther2010; 64(1): 82–87.
32.
HubbuckMFangLMcAndrewR, et al.Occupation-based upper extremity rehabilitation: a case study. J Hand Ther2019; 32(4): 569–570.
33.
McKeePRivardA. Orthoses as enablers of occupation: client-centred splinting for better outcomes. Can J Occup Ther2004; 71(5): 306–314.
34.
ChambersDRodgersMWoolacottN. Not only randomized controlled trials, but also case series should be considered in systematic reviews of rapidly developing technologies. J Clin Epidemiol2009; 62(12): 1253–1260.e4.
PoulsenHSHansenAØ. Occupational performance problems identified by 507 patients: an insight that can guide occupation-based hand therapy. Hand Ther2018; 23(4): 121–129.
37.
MathiowetzVWeberKKashmanN, et al.Adult norms for the nine-hole peg test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res1985; 5(2): 24–38.
38.
Davis SearsEChungKC. Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen–Taylor hand function test. J Hand Surg2010; 35(1): 30–37.
39.
van de Ven-StevensLAWGraffMJLPetersMAM, et al.Construct validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure in participants with tendon injury and dupuytren disease. Phys Ther2015; 95(5): 750–757.
40.
Gracia-IbáñezVVergaraMSancho-BruJL, et al.Functional range of motion of the hand joints in activities of the International classification of functioning, disability and health. J Hand Ther2017; 30(3): 337–347.
