Several studies have investigated grip strength between dominant and non-dominant hands. However, few studies have investigated dominance specific differences and considered dexterity.
This observational study investigated the differences in grip strength and dexterity of the dominant and non-dominant hands using a sample of 18 right- and 12 left-handed healthy individuals, and compared findings within and between these groups.
The Jamar® grip dynamometer and the Purdue Pegboard Test were used to measure grip strength and dexterity. Right-handed individuals demonstrated significant differences in grip strength and dexterity between the dominant and non-dominant hands (p=0.03 and p<0.01, respectively), while left-handed individuals did not (p=0.45 and p=0.29, respectively).
Between-group comparisons found that left-handed individuals were significantly more dexterous with their non-dominant hand compared with the right-handed group. Hand dominance appears to have a considerable effect on hand function and should therefore inform clinicians’ use and interpretation of functional hand assessments when testing right- and left-hand dominant patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ, BurridgeJ, HammondA, and CooperC (2005). ‘The effects of early rheumatoid arthritis on dominant and non-dominant hand impairment and function’, British Journal of Hand Therapy10(3/4): 93–97.
2.
AdamsJ (2002a). ‘The effects of early rheumatoid arthritis on dominant and non-dominant hand grip ratio’, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases61(S1):490.
3.
AdamsJ (2002b). ‘The purpose of outcome measurement in Rheumatology’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy65(4): 172–74.
4.
AmousunS, MoyoA, and MataraC (1995). ‘Trends in hand grip strength in some adult male Zimbabweans’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy58(8): 344–48.
5.
ArmstrongC, and OldhamJ (1999). ‘A Comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths’, Journal of Hand Surgery24-B: 421–25.
6.
BackmanC, CorkS, GibsonD, and ParsonsJ (1992). ‘Assessment of hand function: the relationship between pegboard dexterity and applied dexterity’, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy59(4): 208–13.
7.
BalogunJ, and OnigbindeA (1992). ‘Hand and leg dominance: Do they really affect limb muscle strength?’, Physiotherapy and Practice8:89–96.
8.
BechtolC (1954). ‘The use of a dynamometer with adjustable hand spacings’, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery36-A:819–824.
9.
BlenkironL (2005). ‘Uptake of standardised Hand Assessments in Rheumatology: Why is it so low?’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy68(4): 148–57.
10.
BohannonR, PeolssonA, Massy-WestroppN, DesrosiersJ, and Bear-LehmanJ (2006). ‘Reference values for adult grip strength with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis’, Physiotherapy92:11–15.
11.
BowlingA (2000). Research methods in health.Buckingham: Open University Press.
12.
CaryI, and AdamsJ (2003). ‘A comparison of Dominant and Non-dominant Hand function in both right- and left-handed individuals using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)’, British Journal of Hand Therapy8(1): 4–10.
13.
ClerkeA, and ClerkeJ (2000). ‘A literature review of the Effect of Handedness on Isometric Grip Strength Differences of the Left and Right hands’, American Journal of Occupational Therapy55(2): 206–11.
14.
CrosbyC, and WehbeM (1994). ‘Hand strength: Normative values’, Journal of Hand Surgery19-A:665–70.
15.
ErtemK, InaM, YologluS, ElmaliN, HarmaA, SahinS, and BoraA (2003). ‘Effects of dominance, body mass index and age on grip and pinch strength’, Isokinetics and Exercise Science (11): 219–223.
16.
HolderM (1992). Hand preference questionnaires: One gets what one asks for. Unpublished MPhil Thesis, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA. Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University.
17.
IncelN, CeceliE, DurukanP, ErdemH, and YorganclogluZ (2002). ‘Grip strength: effect of hand dominance’, Singapore Medical Journal43: 234–7.
18.
JudgeJ, and StirlingJ (2003). ‘Fine motor skill performance in left- and right-handers: Evidence of an advantage for left-handers’, Laterality8(4): 297–306.
19.
LawS (1999). ‘Maximum grip strength in normal subjects from 20 to 64 years of age’, Journal of Hand Therapy12(3): 193–200.
20.
MacDermidJ, FehrL, and LindsayK (2002). ‘The effect of physical factors on Grip strength and dexterity’, British Journal of Hand Therapy7(4): 112–18.
21.
Massey-WestropN, RankinW, AhernM, KrishnanJ, and HearnT (2004). ‘Measuring grip strength in normal adults: reference ranges and a comparison of electronic and hydraulic instruments’, Journal of Hand Surgery (29-A): 514–19.
22.
MathiowetzV (1990). ‘Effects of three trials on grip and pinch strength measurements’, Journal of Hand Therapy3:195–98.
23.
MathiowetzV, RennellsC, and DonahoeL (1985a). ‘Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength’, Journal of Hand Surgery10-A:694–97.
24.
MathiowetzV, KashmanN, VollandG, WeberK, DoweM, and RogersS (1985b). ‘Grip and Pinch Strength: Normative data for adults’, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation66: 69–72.
25.
MathiowetzV, WeberK, VollandG, and KashmanN (1984). ‘Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations’, Journal of Hand Surgery9A:222–26.
26.
McPheeS (1987). ‘Functional hand evaluations: A review’, The American Journal of Occupational Therapy41(3): 158–63.
27.
NicolayC, and WalkerA (2005). ‘Grip Strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender’, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics (35): 605–18.
28.
OldfieldR (1971). ‘The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory’, Neuropsychologia (9): 97–113.
29.
ÖzcanA, OzdirencM, and AkinF (2005). “Light touch and Pain sensation differences between Dominant and Non-dominant hands of healthy subjects’, British Journal of Hand Therapy10(3/4):76–9.
30.
ÖzcanA, TulumZ, PinarL, and Ba_kurtF (2004). ‘Comparison of Pressure Pain Threshold, Grip Strength, Dexterity and Touch Pressure of Dominant and Non-Dominant Hands within and Between Right- and Left-Handed Subjects’, Journal of Korean Medical Science19:874–78.
31.
PetersonP, PetrickM, ConnorH, and ConklinD (1989). ‘Grip strength and hand dominance: Challenging the 10% rule’, American Journal of Occupational Therapy43: 444–47.
32.
SteenhuisR, and BrydenM (1999). ‘The relation between hand preference and hand performance: what you get depends on what you measure’, Laterality4(1): 3–26.
33.
SternE (1991). ‘Wrist extensor orthoses: Dexterity and Grip strength across four styles’, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45:42–49.
34.
SternE (1996). ‘Grip strength and finger dexterity across five styles of commercial wrist orthoses’, American Journal of Occupational Therapy50: 32–38.
35.
SwinscowT, and CampbellM (2002), Statistics at Square One.BMJ Books, London.
36.
TaskiranH, KitisA, and AkdurH (2000). ‘Determining functional hand capacity in textile workers in different departments’, Turkish Journal of Medical Science30(2): 177–80.
37.
TiffinJ, and AsherE (1948). ‘The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity’, Journal of Applied Psychology32:234–247.
38.
TiffinJ (1968). Purdue Pegboard: examiner manual.Chicago, IL: Science Research Association.
39.
TurnerA, FosterM, and JohnsonS (2002). Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction: principles, skills and practice.5th edn.Churchill Livingstone, London.
40.
TylerH, AdamsJ, and EllisB (2005). ‘What can handgrip strength tell the Therapist about Hand function?’, British Journal of Hand Therapy10(1) 4–9.
41.
WatanabeT, OwashiK, KanauchiY, MuraN, TakaharaM, and OginoT (2005). ‘The Short-Term Reliability of Grip Strength Measurement and the Effects of Posture and Grip Span’, The Journal of Hand Surgery30-A(3):603–9.
