Cost-effectiveness analysis of Latarjet versus arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage in anterior shoulder instability: A retrospective cohort study from Ecuador

Abstract

Background

Recurrent anterior shoulder instability with subcritical glenoid bone loss poses a treatment dilemma. Arthroscopic Bankart repair with additional remplissage and the open Latarjet procedure are commonly used, but their real-world economic impact in Latin America is poorly defined.

Objective

To compare midterm clinical outcomes and real-world costs between the Latarjet procedure and arthroscopic Bankart repair with additional remplissage in Ecuadorian patients with subcritical glenoid bone loss, representing a surgical decision “gray zone” rather than prognostically equivalent populations.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 40 patients (20 per group) with ≥48 months of follow-up was analyzed. Functional outcomes (Constant, Rowe, SANE) and direct and indirect costs were assessed and standardized to 2022 USD.

Results

Functional outcomes were comparable, with no recurrent dislocations observed. Total costs were significantly lower for the Latarjet procedure (USD 4625 vs. USD 10,092), mainly due to implant-related expenses.

Conclusion

When clinical outcomes are comparable, the Latarjet procedure was associated with lower overall costs, supporting a value-based surgical approach tailored to local healthcare settings.

Level of Evidence

IV – Retrospective Comparative Study.

Keywords

Shoulder dislocation Latarjet procedure arthroscopy cost–benefit analysis orthopedic procedures treatment outcome health care costs recurrence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burkhart

De Beer

. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 2000; 16: 677–694.

Thomas

Matsen

. An approach to the repair of avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments in the management of traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 506–513.

Bayley

Kessel

Wilson

. A new method for shoulder rehabilitation after injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 73–76.

Kuhn

Dunn

, et al. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder instability cohort: rationale and methodology. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 678–687.

Balg

Boileau

. The instability severity index score: a simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilization. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 1470–1477.

Bankart

ASB

. Recurrent or habitual dislocation of the shoulder joint. Br Med J 1923; 2: 1132–1133.

Boileau

Villalba

Héry

, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1755–1763.

Porcellini

Campi

Pegreffi

, et al. Predisposing factors for recurrent shoulder dislocation after arthroscopic treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 653–658.

Purchase

Wolf

Hobgood

, et al. Hill-Sachs “remplissage”: an arthroscopic solution for the engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 2008; 24: 723–726.

10.

Buza

3rd Iyengar

Anakwenze

, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the management of anterior shoulder instability: clinical outcomes based on the number of preoperative dislocations. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42: 1795–1801.

11.

Latarjet

. A propos du traitement des luxations récidivantes de l'épaule. Lyon Chir 1954; 49: 994–1003.

12.

Yamamoto

Itoi

Abe

, et al. Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16: 649–656.

13.

Shaha

Cook

Rowles

, et al. Redefining “critical” bone loss in shoulder instability: functional outcomes worsen with “subcritical” bone loss. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 1719–1725.

14.

Zimmermann

Scheyerer

Farshad

, et al. Long-term restoration of anterior shoulder stability: a retrospective comparison of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44: 1111–1117.

15.

Hurley

Manjunath

Bloom

, et al. Remplissage versus Latarjet in the treatment of engaging Hill–Sachs lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JSES Rev Rep Tech 2023; 3: 70–75.

16.

Makhni

Swart

Steinhaus

, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the Latarjet procedure versus arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44: 1454–1461.

17.

Churchill

Ghorai

Smith

. The economic impact of implant choice in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 1623–1629.

18.

Min

Fedorka

Solberg

, et al. The cost-effectiveness of the arthroscopic Bankart versus open Latarjet in the treatment of primary shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27: S2–S9.

19.

Pugliese

Loppini

Vanni

, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet reconstruction in patients with an Instability Severity Index Score between 4 and 6. Int Orthop 2023; 47: 1235–1243.

20.

Drummond

Sculpher

Claxton

, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

21.

Olds

Ellis

Parmar

, et al. Who will redislocate his/her shoulder? Predicting recurrent instability following a first traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2019; 5: e000447.