Revision-free reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients report greater difficulty with some activities of daily living compared to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty patients at mid-term follow-up
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Revision-free reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients report greater difficulty with some activities of daily living compared to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty patients at mid-term follow-up
Few studies have directly compared limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) between reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). This study evaluates ADL function at mid-term follow-up in patients with revision-free RSA and aTSA.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included 250 patients who underwent primary aTSA (n = 177) or RSA (n = 73) with a minimum follow-up of 7 years (mean 10 ± 2 years). Patients who had revision surgery were excluded. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to assess the odds of RSA patients reporting better ADL function compared to aTSA patients.
Results
Postoperatively, a greater proportion of aTSA patients reported normal ADLs compared to RSA patients. On multivariable analysis, controlling for baseline differences, RSA patients reported lower ADL function for personal hygiene/toilet needs (Odds ratio [OR] 0.21 [95% CI: 0.07–0.65]; p = 0.006), washing/combing hair (OR 0.36 [0.13–1.02]; p = 0.049), putting on a button-up shirt (OR 0.08 [0.02–0.25]; p < 0.001), and putting on pants (OR 0.12 [0.03–0.39]; p < 0.001).
Discussion
After adjusting for differences in baseline factors, RSA patients reported greater difficulty with specific ADL tasks—including toileting, personal hygiene, grooming, and dressing—compared to aTSA patients.
KruppRMaCBNylandJ, et al.Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty pain and function: new perspectives from a 10-year multicenter study at the 7-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2023; 143: 4049–4063.
2.
HaoKAHonesKMElwellJ, et al.Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff: a midterm comparison of early top performers. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2024; 32: e1102–e1110.
3.
CampbellRJuAKingMT, et al.Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Qual Life Res2022; 31: 1597–1620.
4.
WeinbergMMollonBKaplanD, et al.Improvement in sleep quality after total shoulder arthroplasty. Phys Sportsmed2020; 48: 194–198.
5.
MaierMWNiklaschMDreherT, et al.Motion patterns in activities of daily living: 3- year longitudinal follow-up after total shoulder arthroplasty using an optical 3D motion analysis system. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2014; 15: 44.
6.
KoladeOGhoshNBuchalterD, et al.Patterns of limitations in activities of daily living, sleep, and pain in the early postoperative period following total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study. JSES Int2023; 7: 16–20.
7.
RojasJBitzerAJosephJ, et al.Toileting ability of patients after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Int2020; 4: 174–181.
8.
CosciaACMatarRNEspinalEE, et al.Does preoperative diagnosis impact patient outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2021; 30: 1458–1470.
9.
NorthDHonesKMJenkinsP, et al.How common is nerve injury after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2023; 32: 872–884.
10.
GrobAFreisledererFMarzelA, et al.Glenoid component loosening in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: association between radiological predictors and clinical parameters-an observational study. J Clin Med2021; 10: 34.
11.
De WildeLBoileauPVan der BrachtH. Does reverse shoulder arthroplasty for tumors of the proximal humerus reduce impairment?Clin Orthop Relat Res2011; 469: 2489–2495.
12.
MercurioMCastioniDIannoB, et al.Outcomes of revision surgery after periprosthetic shoulder infection: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2019; 28: 1193–1203.
13.
FlurinPHMarczukYJanoutM, et al.Comparison of outcomes using anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)2013; 71: 101–107.
14.
KingJJWrightLHaoKA, et al.The shoulder arthroplasty smart score correlates well with legacy outcome scores without a ceiling effect. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2023; 31: 97–105.
15.
GreenGHDigglePJ. On the operational characteristics of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate procedure. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol2007; 6: Article27.
16.
ShahADBartlettJWCarpenterJ, et al.Comparison of random forest and parametric imputation models for imputing missing data using MICE: a CALIBER study. Am J Epidemiol2014; 179: 764–774.
17.
StekhovenDJBuhlmannP. Missforest–non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics2012; 28: 112–118.
18.
FeijenSStruyfTKuppensK, et al.Prediction of shoulder pain in youth competitive swimmers: the development and internal validation of a prognostic prediction model. Am J Sports Med2021; 49: 154–161.
19.
BuchananTRHaoKACuetoRJ, et al.Defining the tipping point for revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow2025; 17: 439–449.
20.
SchochBSKingJJZuckermanJ, et al.Anatomic versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up comparison. Shoulder Elbow2021; 13: 518–526.
21.
FriedmanRJSchochBSEichingerJK, et al.Comparison of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with an intact rotator cuff and no previous surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2022; 30: 941–948.
22.
FlurinPHRocheCPWrightTW, et al.A comparison and correlation of clinical outcome metrics in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)2015; 73: S118–S123.
23.
HaoKAGreeneATWerthelJD, et al.Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis with preoperative rotational stiffness and an intact rotator cuff: a case control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2023; 32: e355–e365.
24.
RocheCFlurinPHWrightT, et al.An evaluation of the relationships between reverse shoulder design parameters and range of motion, impingement, and stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2009; 18: 734–741.
25.
RohmanEKingJJRocheCP, et al.Factors associated with improvement or loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2022; 31: e346–e358.
26.
KatzS. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc1983; 31: 721–727.
27.
KimMSJeongHYKimJD, et al.Difficulty in performing activities of daily living associated with internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2020; 29: 86–94.
28.
NamdariSYagnikGEbaughDD, et al.Defining functional shoulder range of motion for activities of daily living. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2012; 21: 1177–1183.
29.
EichingerJKRaoMVLinJJ, et al.The effect of body mass index on internal rotation and function following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2021; 30: 265–272.
30.
ShethMKitzigerRShahAA. Understanding loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a narrative review of current literature. JSES Rev Rep Tech2024; 4: 647–653.
31.
AtwanYWaltonMJWattsAC, et al.Anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Shoulder Elbow2025: 17585732251319977. DOI: 10.1177/17585732251319977.
32.
ArdebolJFloresAKilicAI, et al.Patients 75 years or older with primary glenohumeral arthritis and an intact rotator cuff show similar clinical improvement after reverse or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2024; 33: 1254–1260.
33.
WrightMAKeenerJDChamberlainAM. Comparison of clinical outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients 70 years and older with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2020; 28: e222–e229.
34.
MousadADBeleckasCMLackB, et al.Anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: outcomes in patients 80 years old and older. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2025; 34: 2122–2129.
35.
BustamanteGCKatayamaESPallumeeraM, et al.Internal rotation-based activities of daily living show limitations following reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES2024; 34: 877–883.
36.
WhiteAEPascual-LeoneNFinocchiaroA, et al.What activities do patients hope to perform following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty but are unable to? Looking beyond patient-reported outcome measures. JSES Int2025; 9: 188–193.
