Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2026
Comparison of screw versus suture button fixation techniques in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder instability: A systematic review
The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is an established treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with significant glenoid bone loss. This systematic review compared outcomes of screw versus suture-button fixation and identified contexts where each technique may be advantageous.
Methods
Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched on 23 July 2024 for English-language studies of arthroscopic Latarjet procedures using screw or suture-button fixation. Eligible studies included full-text human data with clear follow-up and outcome reporting. Extracted data included demographics, surgical details, functional scores, union rates, complications, and reoperations. Risk of bias was assessed using established tools for non-randomized studies. Pooled statistical comparisons for complication, reoperation, and non-union rates were performed using chi-square tests.
Results
Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria: 11 using suture-button fixation (804 patients) and nine using screws (753 patients). Both techniques achieved high graft union rates (>90%) and improved functional outcomes. Suture-button fixation showed lower complication (13.3% vs. 22.1%, p < 0.001) and reoperation rates (0.8% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.00001), with a non-significant trend toward higher non-union (9.6% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.08).
Conclusion
Both fixation methods restore shoulder stability effectively. Fixation choice should be individualized to patient anatomy, functional demands, and surgeon experience. Further prospective comparative studies are warranted.
ApostolakosJMWright-ChisemJGulottaLV, et al.Anterior glenohumeral instability: current review with technical pearls and pitfalls of arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization. World J Orthop2021; 12: 1–13.
2.
BauerSCollinPZumsteinMA, et al.Current concepts in chronic traumatic anterior shoulder instability. EFORT Open Rev2023; 8: 468–481.
3.
SofuHGürsuSKoçkaraN, et al.Recurrent anterior shoulder instability: review of the literature and current concepts. World J Clin Cases2014; 2: 676–682.
4.
GarciaGHLiuJNDinesDM, et al.Effect of bone loss in anterior shoulder instability. World J Orthop2015; 6: 421–433.
5.
GetzCLJoyceCD. Arthroscopic Latarjet for shoulder instability. Orthop Clin North Am2020; 51: 373–381.
6.
HurleyETSchwartzLBMojicaES, et al.Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2021; 30: 1693–1699.
7.
ShaoZZhaoYLuoH, et al.Clinical and radiologic outcomes of all-arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with modified suture button fixation: excellent bone healing with a low complication rate. Arthroscopy2022; 38: 2157–2165.e7.
8.
Lacouture-SuarezJDAzarMBrusalisCM, et al.Screw-related complications may occur at a greater rate after arthroscopic versus open Latarjet procedure: a systematic review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil2023; 5: 100726.
9.
GrecoVDescampsJCatalanNM, et al.High rate of return to sport in contact and collision athletes after arthroscopic Latarjet with cortical button fixation. Am J Sports Med2024; 52: 3094–3102.
10.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: 71.
11.
WrightJGSwiontkowskiMFHeckmanJD. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am2003; 85: –3.
12.
MogaCGuoBSchopflocherD, et al.Development of a quality appraisal tool for case series studies using a modified Delphi technique. Edmont Inst Heal Econ ISBN 978-1-926929-04-0 2012.
13.
SlimKNiniEForestierD, et al.Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg2003; 73: 712–716.
14.
WhitingPSavovićJHigginsJPT, et al.ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol2016; 69: 225–234.
15.
DalmasYThéluCELaumonerieP, et al.Arthroscopic double-button Latarjet: two-thirds of bone block healed at 90 days. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2021; 29: 136–142.
16.
XuJLiuHLuW, et al.Modified arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: suture-button fixation achieves excellent remodeling at 3-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med2020; 48: 39–47.
17.
WeickJWKaliaVPachecoE, et al.Osseous healing with nonrigid suture fixation in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. Orthop J Sports Med2020; 8: 2325967120964489.
18.
DalmasYThéluCELaumonerieP, et al.Arthroscopic double-button Latarjet osteolysis and remodeling at 1-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2022; 31: e603–e612.
19.
DalmasYThéluCELaumonerieP, et al.The arthroscopic double-button Latarjet does not modify the static posterior translation of the humeral head. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2024; 110: 103662.
20.
TeissierPBouhaliHDegeorgeB, et al.Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and suture-button fixation: can we predict nonunion early. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2023; 32: 610–617.
21.
NairAVPanakkalJJMohanPK, et al.Clinical and radiological outcome following arthroscopic Latarjet with cerclage FiberTape fixation with a minimum 1-year follow-up. JSES Int2024; 8: 946–953.
22.
PelletierJBarretHDalmasY, et al.Outcomes of arthroscopic cortical-button Latarjet procedure with minimum 5-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2025; 34: 1216–1224.
23.
DescampsJGrecoVChelliM, et al.The arthroscopically guided Bristow-Latarjet procedure with cortical button fixation: a minimum 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med2024; 52: 2815–2825.
24.
BrzóskaRBłasiakASoleckiW, et al.Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with 2-screw stabilization: results of treatment of 156 cases with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Multicenter Study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil2022; 24: 223–237.
25.
BodineMBishaiSKBallGRS, et al.Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure does not lead to loss of clinically significant external rotation at 0° and 90° of shoulder abduction. JSES Int2022; 6: 1023–1028.
26.
BuckupJSternbergCSmolenD, et al.Functional outcome and return to sports after the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure in young and physically active patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2020; 140: 1487–1494.
27.
AlnusifNLariAAlQahtaniS, et al.Strength after the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: are shoulder internal rotation, elbow flexion & supination strength decreased. Shoulder Elbow2024; 16: 53–58.
28.
ZengZLiuCLiuY, et al.Early outcomes of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure in a series of 37 patients with shoulder instability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2021; 22: 45.
29.
CastropilWSchorBBitarA, et al.Arthroscopic Latarjet: technique description and preliminary results. Study of the first 30 cases. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)2020; 55: 208–214.
30.
BrzoskaRLaprusHMalikSS, et al.Return to preinjury-level sports after arthroscopic Latarjet for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in professional athletes. Orthop J Sports Med2023; 11: 23259671231166371.
31.
ShaoZJiangYSongQ, et al.Short-term complications of arthroscopic Bristow or Latarjet procedure with screw versus suture-button fixation: a prospective study of 308 consecutive cases by a single surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am2024; 106: 1180–1188.
32.
MouchantafMBastardCCorsiaS, et al.High rates of return to play and low recurrence rate after arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability in rugby players. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil2024; 6: 100912.
33.
LafosseLLejeuneEBouchardA, et al.The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Arthroscopy2007; 23: 1242.e1–5.
34.
BoileauPGendrePBabaM, et al.A guided surgical approach and novel fixation method for arthroscopic Latarjet. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2016; 25: 78–89.
35.
BøeBStøenRØBlichI, et al.Learning curve for arthroscopic shoulder Latarjet procedure shows shorter operating time and fewer complications with experience. Arthroscopy2022; 38: 2391–2398.
36.
ValsamisEMKanyJBonnevialleN, et al.The arthroscopic Latarjet: a multisurgeon learning curve analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2020; 29: 681–688.
37.
BishaiSKBallGRSKingC, et al.Arthroscopic Latarjet learning curve: operating time decreases after 25 cases. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil2023; 5: e179–e184.
