Traditional classifications usually focus on fracture morphology. This study aims to analyse rotational deformities in valgus displaced fractures in a retrospective cohort setup and investigate correlation with tuberosity displacement and glenohumeral alignment.
Methods
One hundred and fifty-one three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) images were analysed. Axis systems were defined in the glenoid, head and diaphysis using Mimics and 3-Matic. Rotational analysis was performed using MATLAB. These were compared to normal values obtained on 87 3D reconstructed CT images of intact shoulders and divided into varus and valgus type, yielding 50 valgus fractures. Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U tests and Spearman correlations.
Results
Three- and four-part fractures showed significant anteflexion (p = 0.025 and 0.033) and internal rotation (p = 0.004 and 0.004) of head versus glenoid. Two- and three-part fractures showed significant retroflexion of shaft versus head (p = 0.012 and 0.022) whilst four-part fractures showed significant internal rotation of shaft versus head (p = 0.001). A positive correlation was observed between valgus and tuberosity displacement (p < 0.001).
Discussion
This highlights the importance of reducing both valgus and head anteflexion, particularly in three- and four-part fractures. Furthermore, there is a correlation between the displacement of the greater and lesser tuberosities and the degree of valgus displacement.
BergdahlCEkholmCWennergrenD, et al.Epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of 2,011 humeral fractures: data from the Swedish Fracture Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2016; 17: 1–10.
2.
SlobogeanGPJohalHLefaivreKA, et al.A scoping review of the proximal humerus fracture literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2015; 16: 112.
3.
CurtinPBHallRRMollaVG, et al.Morbidity and mortality of fragility proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to a level one trauma center. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2022; 31: 2116–2120.
4.
MaravicMBriotKRouxC. Burden of proximal humerus fractures in the French National Hospital Database. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2014; 100: 931–934.
5.
CalvoEMorcilloDForuriaAM, et al.Nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures: high incidence among outpatient-treated osteoporotic fractures and severe impact on upper extremity function and patient subjective health perception. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2011; 20: 795–801.
6.
LaunonenAPLepolaVSarankoA, et al.Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures. Arch Osteoporos2015; 10: 209.
7.
EdelsonGSaffuriHObidE, et al.The three-dimensional anatomy of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2009; 18: 535–544.
8.
Court-BrownCMCaesarB. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury2006; 37: 691–697.
9.
Court-BrownCMGargAMcQueenMM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand2001; 72: 365–371.
10.
ReschHTauberMNeviaserRJ, et al.Classification of proximal humeral fractures based on a pathomorphologic analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2016; 25: 455–462.
11.
HasanAPPhadnisJJaarsmaRL, et al.Fracture line morphology of complex proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2017; 26: e300–e308.
12.
MüllerMEKochPNazarianS, et al.The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin: Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1990.
13.
GuminaSGiannicolaGAlbinoP, et al.Comparison between two classifications of humeral head fractures: Neer and AO-ASIF. Acta Orthop Belg2011; 77: 751–757.
14.
NeerCS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part I. Classification and evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res1987; 223: 3–10.
15.
HertelRHempfingAStiehlerM, et al.Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2004; 13: 427–433.
16.
NeerCS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am1970; 52: 1090–1103.
17.
SolbergBDMoonCNFrancoDP, et al.Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma2009; 23: 113–119.
18.
ChandrappaMHHajibandehSHajibandehS. Postoperative outcomes of initial varus versus initial valgus proximal humerus fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma2017; 8: 14–20.
19.
CapricciosoCEZuckermanJDEgolKA. Initial varus displacement of proximal humerus fractures results in similar function but higher complication rates. Injury2016; 47: 909–913.
20.
De WildeLDefoortSVerstraetenTRGM, et al.A 3D-CT scan study of the humeral and glenoid planes in 150 normal shoulders. Surg Radiol Anat2012; 34: 743–750.
21.
IannottiJPGabrielJPSchneckSL, et al.The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am1992; 74: 491–500.
22.
VerstraetenTRGMDeschepperEJacxsensM, et al.Determination of a reference system for the three-dimensional study of the glenohumeral relationship. Skeletal Radiol2013; 42: 1061–1071.
23.
PiepersIBoudtPVan TongelA, et al.Evaluation of the muscle volumes of the transverse rotator cuff force couple in nonpathologic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2014; 23: e158–e162.
24.
KluteLPfeiferCWeissI, et al.Displacement of the greater tuberosity in humeral head fractures does not only depend on rotator cuff status. J Clin Med2021; 10: 4136.
25.
ForuriaAMDe GraciaMMLarsonDR, et al.The pattern of the fracture and displacement of the fragments predict the outcome in proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br2011; 93: 378–386.
26.
GallantAVan IsterdaelTKarelseA, et al.Rotational analysis of varus-type proximal humerus fractures: implications for fracture reduction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2025; 34: e1053–e1059.
27.
SahuDJagiasiJDValaviAS, et al.The distance between the pectoralis major tendon insertion and the top of the humeral head is a reliable landmark: an anatomic study. Joints2019; 7: 37–40.
28.
MurachovskyJIkemotoRYNascimentoLGP, et al.Pectoralis major tendon reference (PMT): a new method for accurate restoration of humeral length with hemiarthroplasty for fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2006; 15: 675–678.
29.
JeongJBryanJIannottiJP. Effect of a variable prosthetic neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am2009; 91: 1932–1941.
30.
HromádkaRKuběnaAAŠmídM, et al.Medial calcar of proximal humeral fracture as landmark in restoration of humeral length in case of hemiarthroplasty. Surg Radiol Anat2014; 36: 473–479.
31.
BoisAJLoIKY. Surgical anatomy of the pectoralis major tendon insertion revisited: relationship to nearby structures and the pectoral eminence for defining the anatomic footprint. JSES Int2020; 4: 324–332.
32.
AgelJJonesCBSanzoneAG, et al.Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with Polarus nail fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2004; 13: 191–195.
33.
BoileauPWalchG. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus: implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg1997; 79: 857–865..
34.
De WildeLFVerstraetenTSpeeckaertW, et al.Reliability of the glenoid plane. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2010; 19: 414–422.
35.
SchliemannBWähnertDTheisenC, et al.How to enhance the stability of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures? An overview of current biomechanical and clinical data. Injury2015; 46: 1207–1214.
36.
DahanGTrabelsiNSafranO, et al.Verified and validated finite element analyses of humeri. J Biomech2016; 49: 1094–1102.
37.
MaldonadoZMSeebeckJHellerMO, et al.Straining of the intact and fractured proximal humerus under physiological-like loading. J Biomech2003; 36: 1865–1873.
38.
LiuJZhangZLiP, et al.Enhancing fixation stability in proximal humerus fractures: screw orientation optimization in PHILOS plates through finite element analysis and biomechanical testing. Sci Rep2024; 14: 27064.
