Conflicting data exists surrounding the impact of body mass index (BMI) on total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) outcomes.
Methods
This retrospective study reviewed patients undergoing primary anatomic and reverse TSA with ≥2-year follow-up and completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and Visual Analog Scale. PROMs and range of motion (ROM) were analyzed based on BMI and other metabolic factors, including hemoglobin A1C, albumin, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and vitamin D.
Results
A total of 217 patients were included, with an average follow-up of 34 months. No differences were found in ROM or PROMs at final follow-up, based on categorical BMIs of <30, 30–40, and >40 kg/m2. However, BMI > 40 was associated with greater improvements in ASES (P = 0.018) and SANE (P = 0.028) scores. Achievement of ASES minimal clinically important difference was also higher in patients with a higher BMI as a continuous variable (P = 0.019), likely due to lower pre-operative scores. Other metabolic factors were not independently associated with final PROMs.
Conclusion
Obesity, including BMI > 40 kg/m2, does not negatively impact perceived and functional improvement following TSA.
WagnerERFarleyKXHigginsI, et al.The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2020; 29: 2601–2609.
2.
HalesCM. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States. 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief2020; 360: 1–8.
3.
WallKCPolitzerCSChahlaJ,et al.Obesity is associated with an increased prevalence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and arthroplasty: a cohort study. Orthop Clin North Am2020; 51: 259–264.
4.
MorganSDJWallCJde SteigerRN, et al.Obesity is associated with an increased risk of undergoing shoulder arthroplasty in Australia. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2023; 32: 1740–1745.
5.
ZusmanovichMKesterBSSchwarzkopfR. Postoperative complications of total joint arthroplasty in obese patients stratified by BMI. J Arthroplasty2018; 33: 856–864.
6.
WagnerERKamathAFFruthK, et al.Effect of body mass index on reoperation and complications after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am2016; 98: 2052–2060.
7.
WagnerERKamathAFFruthKM, et al.Effect of body mass index on complications and reoperations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am2016; 98: 169–179.
8.
MayfieldCKAbu-ZahraMSYensenK, et al.Effect of body mass index on complications following total shoulder arthroplasty: a population-wide analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2025; 34: 33–42.
9.
CoganCJFloresSEFreshmanRD, et al.Effect of obesity on short- and long-term complications of shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2023; 32: 253–259.
10.
JiangJJSomogyiJRPatelPB, et al.Obesity is not associated with increased short-term complications after primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res2016; 474: 787–795.
11.
AgarwalARWangKYXuAL, et al.Obesity does not associate with 5-year surgical complications following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2023; 32: 947–957.
12.
WagnerERHoudekMTSchleckC, et al.Increasing body mass index is associated with worse outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am2017; 99: 929–937.
13.
HonesKMHaoKACuetoRJ, et al.The obesity paradox: a nonlinear relationship between 30-day postoperative complications and body mass index after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2023; 31: 1165–1172.
14.
MorrisBJHaiglerRECochranJM, et al.Obesity has minimal impact on short-term functional scores after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)2016; 45: E180–E186.
15.
EichingerJKRaoMVLinJJ, et al.The effect of body mass index on internal rotation and function following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2021; 30: 265–272.
16.
ShahAGalalYWernerBC, et al.Obesity is associated with improvement in functional outcome but lower internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Int2024; 8: 147–151.
17.
KatayamaESDurisekGRBustamanteGC, et al.The role of body mass index in survivorship and clinical outcomes in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2024; 33: 1980–1989.
18.
SavinDDFrankRMSumnerS, et al.Good functional outcomes expected after shoulder arthroplasty irrespective of body mass index. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2018; 27: S43–S49.
19.
ReidJJKunkleBFKothandaramanV, et al.Effects of obesity on clinical and functional outcomes following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2022; 31: 17–25.
20.
Michael WiaterJCarpenterSKoueiterDM, et al.Influence of body mass index on clinical outcomes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv2017; 26: 134–142.
21.
LiXWilliamsPNNguyenJT, et al.Functional outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty in obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am2013; 95: e160.
22.
WhiteCAPatelAVCirinoCM, et al.Does body mass index influence long-term outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty?J Shoulder Elbow Surg2023; 32: 991–1000.
23.
StatzJMWagnerERHoudekMT, et al.Outcomes of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with morbid obesity. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2016; 25: e191–e198.
24.
GrusonKILoYRothchildE, et al.Does morbid obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m2) impact operative time, blood loss, length of stay, or complications following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty?Arch Bone Jt Surg2023; 11: 389–397.
WernerBCBurrusMTBrowneJA,et al.Superobesity (body mass index >50 kg/m2) and complications after total shoulder arthroplasty: an incremental effect of increasing body mass index. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2015; 24: 1868–1875.
27.
LevyJCEverdingNGGilCC, et al.Speed of recovery after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2014; 23: 1872–1881.
28.
TashjianRZHungMKeenerJD, et al.Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2017; 26: 144–148.
29.
SimovitchRFlurinPHWrightT, et al.Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2018; 27: 298–305.
LevyJCAshukemMTFormainiNT. Factors predicting postoperative range of motion for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2016; 25: 55–60.
32.
DoniganJAFrisellaWAHaaseD, et al.Pre-operative and intra-operative factors related to shoulder arthroplasty outcomes. Iowa Orthop J2009; 29: 60–66.
