Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a low-volume, high-complexity procedure and clinical guidelines recommend moving to a centralised network model. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of surgeon and unit volume on patient and service level clinical outcomes.
Methods
Analysis the Hospital Episodes Statistics database (HES) for elective and emergency primary TEA surgery between January 2014 and December 2023 was performed. The exposures of interest were surgeon and trust volume in the 12 months preceding index surgery. The primary outcome was revision surgery within 12 months of index procedure. Secondary outcomes were 30-day emergency readmission and length of stay (LOS) greater than the median.
Results
In total, 4101 primary TEA cases performed in 123 trusts were included. One-year revision and 30-day emergency readmission were not associated with trust or surgeon volume. LOS greater than the median showed a significant association with both surgeon and unit TEA volume. Patients undergoing primary TEA by surgeons performing fewer than 10 cases per year have three times the likelihood of LOS over three days.
Conclusion
There are significant resource savings from networked service reconfiguration. Careful monitoring of clinical outcomes is required, ideally using patient reported outcomes in addition to implant survival, readmission and LOS.
BriggsTWR. Getting It Right in Orthopaedics: Reflecting on success and reinforcing improvement. A follow-up on the GIRFT national specialty report on orthopaedics. London: UK: Getting it right first time, 2020.
2.
BriggsTWR. A national review of adult elective orthopaedic services in England: Getting it right first time. London: UK: Getting it right first time, 2015.
BlochBVMatarHEBerberR, et al.The impact of a revision arthroplasty network on patient outcomes: analysis of a national administrative dataset in England. Bone Joint J2023; 105: 641–648.
5.
SabahSAvon FritschLKhanT, et al.Revision total knee replacement case-mix at a major revision centre. J Exp Orthop2022; 9: 34.
6.
MatthewsAHGrayWKEvansJP, et al.Higher hospital volume reduces early failure rates in single-stage revision TKR for infection: An analysis of the United Kingdom National Joint Registry and National Administrative Databases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12690. Online ahead of print.
7.
ValsamisEMCollinsGSPinedo-VillanuevaR, et al.Association between surgeon volume and patient outcomes after elective shoulder replacement surgery using data from the national joint registry and hospital episode statistics for England: population based cohort study. Br Med J2023; 381: e075355.
8.
BrownJSGordonRJPengY, et al.Lower operating volume in shoulder arthroplasty is associated with increased revision rates in the early postoperative period: long-term analysis from the Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2020; 29: 1104–1114.
9.
GirdlerSJMazaNLieberAM, et al.Impact of surgeon case volume on outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2023; 31: 1228–1235.
10.
HaySKulkarniRWattsA, et al.The provision of primary and revision elbow replacement surgery in the NHS. Shoulder Elbow2018; 10: S5–S12.
11.
RanganAFalworthMWattsAC, et al.Investigation and management of periprosthetic joint infection in the shoulder and elbow: evidence and consensus based guidelines of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Shoulder Elbow2018; 10: S5–S19.
12.
AbdelmalekADonaldsonO. Total elbow arthroplasty survey 2015: current service provision and future improvements (England and Wales). Shoulder Elbow2019; 11: 292–299.
13.
JenkinsPJWattsACNorwoodT, et al.Total elbow replacement: outcome of 1,146 arthroplasties from the Scottish arthroplasty project. Acta Orthop2013; 84: 119–123.
14.
GayDMLymanSDoH, et al.Indications and reoperation rates for total elbow arthroplasty: an analysis of trends in New York State. J Bone Joint Surg Am2012; 94: 110–117.
15.
PrkićAVermeulenNPKooistraBW, et al.Is there a relationship between surgical volume and outcome for total elbow arthroplasty? A systematic review. EFORT Open Rev2023; 8: 45–51.
16.
Al-HamdaniAMackenAPrkicA, et al.Analysis of 516 cases of revision total elbow arthroplasty from the Dutch arthroplasty registry: centralization of care is the future. Semin Arthroplasty2024; 34: 430–435.
17.
MackenAAPrkićAvan OostI, et al.Implant survival of total elbow arthroplasty: analysis of 514 cases from the Dutch arthroplasty registry. Bone Jt Open2023; 4: 110–119.
18.
PoffCKunkleBLiX, et al.Assessing the hospital volume–outcome relationship in total elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2022; 31: 367–374.
19.
RodriguezKALevinJMBethellM, et al.Key drivers of 90-day costs in primary total elbow arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty2023; 33: 775–781.
20.
HamoodiZGehringerCKBullLM, et al.Prognostic factors associated with failure of total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review. Bone Joint Res2024; 13: 201–213.
21.
SinghHPChongHHRavalP, et al.Elbow conditions: research priorities setting in partnership with the James Lind Alliance. BMJ Open2022; 12: e062177.
22.
SinhaSPeachGPolonieckiJD, et al.Studies using English administrative data (hospital episode statistics) to assess health-care outcomes—systematic review and recommendations for reporting. Eur J Public Health2013; 23: 86–92.
23.
von ElmEAltmanDGEggerM, et al.The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet2007; 370: 1453–1457.
Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) / NHS England, British Elbow and Shoulder Society, British Orthopaedic Association. Orthopaedics: Trauma total elbow replacement (high level) pathway v 1.1. London, UK; 2022 Jan [cited 2025 Mar 5]. Available from: https://future.nhs.uk/GIRFTNational/view?objectId=152835909.
GrayWKNavaratnamAVDayJ, et al.Volume-outcome associations for parathyroid surgery in England: analysis of an administrative data set for the getting it right first time program. JAMA Surg2022; 157: 581–588.
30.
GrayWKDayJBriggsTWR, et al.Volume-outcome relationship for adrenalectomy: analysis of an administrative dataset for the getting it right first time programme. Brit J Surg2021; 108: 1112–1119.
31.
GilbertTNeuburgerJKraindlerJ, et al.Development and validation of a hospital frailty risk score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study. Lancet2018; 391: 1775–1782.
KrenekLFarngEZingmondD,et al.Complication and revision rates following total elbow arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am2011; 36: 68–73.
34.
EvansJPEvansJTMohammadHR, et al.How long does an elbow replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-series and national registry reports with more than 10 years of follow-up. Acta Orthop2022; 93: 495–502.
35.
HamoodiZSayersAWhitehouseMR, et al.Total elbow arthroplasty in England. Bone Joint J2024; 106-B(11): 1312–1320.
36.
ZhangDEarpBEBlazarP. Factors associated with 30-day complication, reoperation, readmission, and length of stay after primary total elbow arthroplasty: a database study of 555 patients. Semin Arthroplasty2023; 33: 59–66.
37.
NouraeiSARHudovskyAFramptonAE, et al.A study of clinical coding accuracy in surgery. Ann Surg2015; 261: 1096–1107.
38.
HardyFHeylJTuckerK, et al.Data consistency in the English hospital episodes statistics database. BMJ Health Care Inform2022; 29: e100633.
39.
HeylJHardyFTuckerK, et al.Data quality and autism: issues and potential impacts. Int J Med Inform2023; 170: 104938.
40.
BoultonCHarrisonCWiltonT, et al.Implementing large-scale data quality validation in a national arthroplasty registry to improve compliance. Bone Jt Open2022; 3: 716–725.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
