A systematic review,and meta-analysis of pain outcomes following total elbow replacement and hemi-replacement for unreconstructible acute distal humerus fractures in adults
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2026
A systematic review,and meta-analysis of pain outcomes following total elbow replacement and hemi-replacement for unreconstructible acute distal humerus fractures in adults
Unreconstructible distal humerus fractures have been managed with total elbow replacement (TER), but there is increasing use of hemi-replacement (DHH). Pain has been identified as the most important outcome by patients. This study aims to systematically review the literature on reported pain outcomes in adult distal humerus fractures treated with TER or DHH.
Methods
Medline, Embase and Central were searched using OVID, from January 2000 to September 2023, for studies in adults undergoing DHH or TER for acute closed distal humerus fractures. The primary outcome was patient-rated pain measured on a numerical rating scale. A quantitative summary of reported outcomes was stratified by intervention type.
Results
Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, including one published randomised controlled trial. Meta-analysis found a pooled average NRS pain for TER of 1.7/10 (95% CI: 0.44–2.99) and 1.5/10 for DHH (95% CI: 0.001–3.56). On a 4-point Likert scale the pooled probability of no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain for TER was 0.75, 0.21, 0.02, 0.00 and for DHH was 0.76, 0.11, 0.12, and 0.00.
Discussion
The available evidence does not enable comparison of pain outcomes between the interventions, which should be assessed in an appropriately powered randomised trial.
Court-BrownCMCaesarB. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury2006; 37: 691–697.
2.
ShepsDMKempKARHildebrandKA. Population-based incidence of distal humerus fractures among adults in a Canadian urban population. Curr Orthop Practice2011; 22: 437–442.
3.
KannusPNiemiSSievanenH, et al.Continuous decline in incidence of distal humeral fracture of older women in Finland. Aging Clin Exp Res2017; 29: 467–471.
4.
PalvanenMKannusPNiemiS, et al.Secular trends in distal humeral fractures of elderly women: nationwide statistics in Finland between 1970 and 2007. Bone2010; 46: 1355–1358.
5.
MüllerMEKochPNazarianS, et al.The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
6.
AitkenSAJenkinsPJRymaszewskiL. Revisiting the ‘bag of bones’: functional outcome after the conservative management of a fracture of the distal humerus. Bone Joint J2015; 97-B: 1132–1138.
7.
McKeeMDVeilletteCJHallJA, et al.A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction–internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2009; 18: 3–12.
BurdenEGBattenTSmithC, et al.Hemiarthroplasty or total elbow arthroplasty for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in patients aged over 65 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes and complications. Bone Joint J2022; 104-B: 559–566.
10.
StoddartMTPanagopoulosGNCraigRS, et al.A systematic review of the treatment of distal humerus fractures in older adults: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical options. Shoulder Elbow2024; 16: 175–185.
11.
NielsenAFAl-HamdaniARasmussenJV, et al.Elbow hemiarthroplasty vs. open reduction internal fixation for acute arbeitsgemeinschaft fur osteosynthesefragen/orthopaedic trauma association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures-A systematic review. JSES Int2022; 6: 713–722.
12.
SheaBJReevesBCWellsG, et al.AMSTAR2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. Br Med J2017; 358: j4008.
13.
WattsACMcDaidCHewittC, et al.Core outcome domains in elbow replacement (CODER). Bone Joint J2024; 106-B: 1306–1311.
14.
CampbellMMcKenzieJESowdenA, et al.Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. Br Med J2020; 368: l6890.
15.
ShamseerLMoherDClarkeM, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. Br Med J2015; 350: g7647.
16.
OuzzaniMHammadyHFedoorowiczZ, et al.Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev2016; 5: 210.
17.
WattsACHamoodiZMcDaidC, et al.Elbow arthroplasty research methods, outcome domains, and instruments used in clinical outcome studies: a scoping review. Bone Joint J2022; 104-B: 1148–1155.
18.
MunnZBarkerTHMoolaS, et al.Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth2020; 18: 2127–2133.
19.
SterneJACSavovicJPageMJ, et al.Rob 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J2019; 366: l4898.
20.
HozoSPDjulbegovicBHozoI. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol2005; 5: 13.
21.
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.4. Cochrane; 2023. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
22.
HigginsJPThompsonSG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med2002; 21: 1539–1558.
23.
HardyRJThompsonSG. Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med1998; 17: 841–856.
JonssonEOEkholmCHallgrenHB, et al.Elbow hemiarthroplasty and total elbow arthroplasty provided a similar functional outcome for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in patients aged 60 years or older: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2024; 33: 343–355.
26.
SchiaviPPogliacomiFGarziaA, et al.Survival and outcome of total elbow arthroplasty for distal humeral fracture at long term follow-up. Acta Biomed2020; 91: e2020031.
27.
AliAShahaneSStanleyD. Total elbow arthroplasty for distal humeral fractures: indications, surgical approach, technical tips, and outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2010; 19: 53–58.
28.
AntunaSALaaksoRBBarreraJL, et al.Linked total elbow arthroplasty as treatment of distal humerus fractures. Acta Orthop Belg2012; 78: 465–472.
29.
BaikJSLeeSHKangHT, et al.Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation with total elbow arthroplasty for intra-articular distal humeral fractures in older age: a retrospective study. Clin Shoulder Elb2020; 23: 94–99.
30.
BarcoRStreubelPNMorreyBF, et al.Total elbow arthroplasty for distal humeral fractures: a ten-year-minimum follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am2017; 99: 1524–1531.
31.
CelliAParoniCBonucciP, et al.Total elbow arthroplasty for acute distal humeral fractures with humeral condyle resection or retention: a long-term follow-up study. JSES Int2021; 5: 797–803.
32.
FrankleMAHerscoviciDJr.DiPasqualeTG, et al.A comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of intraarticular distal humerus fractures in women older than age 65. J Orthop Trauma2003; 17: 473–480.
33.
GallucciGLLarrondo CalderonWBorettoJG, et al.Total elbow arthroplasty for the treatment of distal humeral fractures. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol2016; 60: 167–174.
34.
GambirasioRRiandNSternR, et al.Total elbow replacement for complex fractures of the distal humerus. An option for the elderly patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br2001; 83: 974–978.
35.
GarciaJAMykulaRStanleyD. Complex fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly. The role of total elbow replacement as primary treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br2002; 84: 812–816.
36.
JostBAdamsRAMorreyBF. Management of acute distal humeral fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A case series. J Bone Joint Surg Am2008; 90: 2197–2205.
37.
KamineniSMorreyBF. Distal humeral fractures treated with noncustom total elbow replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am2004; 86: 940–947.
38.
PogliacomiFSchiaviPDefilippoM, et al.Total elbow arthroplasty following complex fractures of the distal humerus: results in patients over 65 years of age. Acta Biomed2016; 87: 148–155.
39.
PrasadNDentC. Outcome of total elbow replacement for distal humeral fractures in the elderly: a comparison of primary surgery and surgery after failed internal fixation or conservative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br2008; 90: 343–348.
40.
PrasadNAliAStanleyD. Total elbow arthroplasty for non-rheumatoid patients with a fracture of the distal humerus: a minimum ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J2016; 98-B: 381–386.
41.
SorensenBWBrorsonSOlsenBS. Primary total elbow arthroplasty in complex fractures of the distal humerus. World J2014; 5: 368–372.
42.
Al-HamdaniARasmussenJVSorensenAKB, et al.Good outcome after elbow hemiarthroplasty in active patients with an acute intra-articular distal humeral fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2019; 28: 925–930.
43.
CelliARicciarelliMGuerraE, et al.Elbow hemiarthroplasty for acute distal humeral fractures and their sequelae: medium- and long-term follow-up of 41 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2022; 31: 1015–1025.
44.
DirckxMTathgarABellringerS, et al.Hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction internal fixation for intra-articular distal humerus fractures in older patients. Shoulder Elbow2023; 15: 83–92.
45.
NestorsonJEkholmCEtznerM, et al.Hemiarthroplasty for irreparable distal humeral fractures: medium-term follow-up of 42 patients. Bone Joint J2015; 97-B: 1377–1384.
46.
RotiniRRicciarelliMGuerraE, et al.Elbow hemiarthroplasty in distal humeral fractures: indication, surgical technique and results. Injury2023; 54: S36–S45.
47.
ArgintarEBerryMNarvySJ, et al.Hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of distal humerus fractures: short-term clinical results. Orthopedics2012; 35: 1042–1045.
48.
FiggieMPSuEPKahnB, et al.Locking mechanism failure in semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2006; 15: 88–93.
49.
GoldbergSHUrbanRMJacobsJJ, et al.Modes of wear after semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am2008; 90: 609–619.
50.
InvestigatorsHBhandariMEinhornTA, et al.Total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. N Engl J Med2019; 381: 2199–2208.
51.
JonssonEOEkholmCSalomonssonB, et al.Collaborators in the SSG. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty provides better shoulder function than hemiarthroplasty for displaced 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in patients aged 70 years or older: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2021; 30: 994–1006.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
