A reproducible method for evaluating the degree and direction of overstuffing of the humeral head component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Abstract

Background

Improper sizing of the humeral head component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) can overstuff the joint, potentially compromising outcomes. The purpose of this study was to validate a novel method of evaluating glenohumeral joint overstuffing in which superoinferior and mediolateral overstuffing can be evaluated independently relative to the native humeral anatomy.

Methods

We identified 25 patients who underwent ATSA and the best Grashey radiograph taken within 1 year of follow-up was assessed using our proposed technique. First, a circle overlaying the implanted humeral head was made. Then, Iannotti's Perfect Circle (IPC) was drawn as originally described. Measurements of superior and medial overstuffing were made using our proposed axes. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by computing interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) using a one-way model. Measurements were summarized as the mean and range, with positive values denoting overstuffing.

Results

The inter-rater reliability for all measurements was excellent (ICC > 0.9). Compared to our method, the IPC method would have missed 77% of overstuffed cases.

Conclusion

We present a reproducible method to assess glenohumeral joint overstuffing in ATSA. This technique addresses limitations of other methods that underestimate overstuffing. Further study is needed to establish a clinically significant value of overstuffing based on the proposed method.

Keywords

shoulder replacement TSA ATSA glenoid loosening glenohumeral arthritis humeral head

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Foruria

Sperling

Ankem

, et al. Total shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis in patients 80 years of age and older. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92: 970–974.

Jensen

Tangtiphaiboontana

Marigi

, et al. Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is associated with excellent outcomes and low revision rates in the elderly. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30: S131–S139.

Alolabi

Youderian

Napolitano

, et al. Radiographic assessment of prosthetic humeral head size after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23: 1740–1746.

Harryman

Sidles

Harris

, et al. The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 555–563.

Piper

Neviaser

. Survivorship of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30: 457–465.

Terrier

Ramondetti

Merlini

, et al. Biomechanical consequences of humeral component malpositioning after anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 1184–1190.

Iannotti

Spencer

Winter

, et al. Prosthetic positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: S111–S121.

Williams

Wong

Pepe

, et al. The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 399–409.

Landis

Koch

. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.

10.

Grubhofer

Muniz Martinez

Haberli

, et al.

Does computerized CT-based 3D planning of the humeral head cut help to restore the anatomy of the proximal humerus after stemless total shoulder arthroplasty?

J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30: e309–e316.

11.

Monir

Hao

Abeyewardene

, et al. Extra-short humeral heads reduce glenohumeral joint overstuffing compared with short heads in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Int 2022; 6: 209–215.