Shoulder arthroplasty in the management of native shoulder joint infections has a high complication rate and poor functional outcome – a systematic review
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online January, 2025
Shoulder arthroplasty in the management of native shoulder joint infections has a high complication rate and poor functional outcome – a systematic review
Shoulder arthroplasty is a treatment option of the sequelae of native shoulder joint infections. However, the functional outcomes and re-infection rates are unknown. The aim of this review was to analyse the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty in patients with native shoulder infections.
Methods
A review of the online databases MEDLINE and Embase was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Studies reporting either primary or secondary infections of native shoulder joints treated with any form of arthroplasty were included and appraised using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) tool.
Results
Fourteen studies were eligible for inclusion. Mean age ranged from 56 to 72 years and the mean follow-up from 20.5 months to 8.2 years. Primary shoulder infections were present in 50 patients and secondary infections in 86. 76 patients underwent a two stage: 46 patients a single-stage procedure whilst 14 refused second-stage surgery. Mean post-operative Constant score ranged from 38 to 56.2. The overall reported re-infection rate was 2.3% and complication rate was 26%.
Conclusion
Shoulder arthroplasty in the management of either primary or secondary native shoulder infections has a high complication rate and low functional outcome but low re-infection rates at short-term follow-up.
MemonMKayJGinsbergL, et al.Arthroscopic management of septic rthritis of the native shoulder: a systematic review. Arthroscopy2018; 34: 625–646.e1.
2.
SalazarLMGutierrez-NaranjoJMMezaC, et al.Joint aspiration and serum markers - do they matter in the diagnosis of native shoulder sepsis? A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2022; 23: 470.
3.
KennedyNChambersSTNolanI, et al.Native joint septic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, and microbiological causes in a New Zealand population. J Rheumatol2015; 42: 2392–2397.
4.
ManeiroJRSoutoACervantesEC, et al.Predictors of treatment failure and mortality in native septic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol2015; 34: 1961–1967.
5.
NelsonGNDavisDENamdariS. Outcomes in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2016; 25: 1337–1345.
6.
TopolskiMSChinPYKSperlingJW, et al.Revision shoulder arthroplasty with positive intraoperative cultures: the value of preoperative studies and intraoperative histology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2006; 15: 402–406.
7.
OchsnerPEBorensOBodlerPM. Infections of the musculoskeletal system: basic principles, prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Swiss orthopaedics in-house-publisher2014.
8.
Parvizi J and Gehrke T.Proceedings of the Second International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection. J Arthroplasty2019; 34: S1–S496.
9.
Garrigues GE, Zmistowski B, Cooper AM, et al.Proceedings from the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections: rationale and methods of the shoulder subgroup. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2019; 28: S4–S7.
10.
SultanaSDeyRBishayiB. Dual neutralization of TNFR-2 and MMP-2 regulates the severity of S. aureus induced septic arthritis correlating alteration in the level of interferon gamma and interleukin-10 in terms of TNFR2 blocking. Immunol Res2018; 66: 97–119.
11.
LeslieBMHarrisJMDriscollD. Septic arthritis of the shoulder in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am1989; 71: 1516–1522.
12.
FarshadMGerberC. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty—from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop2010; 34: 1075–1082.
13.
MirzayanRItamuraJMVangsnessCT, et al.Management of chronic deep infection following rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am2000; 82: 1115–1121.
14.
BramanJPSpragueMBishopJ, et al.The outcome of resection shoulder arthroplasty for recalcitrant shoulder infections. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2006; 15: 549–553.
15.
RispoliDMSperlingJWAthwalGS, et al.Pain relief and functional results after resection arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br2007; 89-B: 1184–1187.
16.
ClareDJWirthMAGrohGI, et al.Shoulder arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am2001; 83: 593–600.
17.
MiletiJSperlingJWCofieldRH. Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of postinfectious glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am2003; 85: 609–614.
18.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009; 6: e1000097.
19.
SlimKNiniEForestierD, et al.Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument: methodological index for non-randomized studies. ANZ J Surg2003; 73: 712–716.
20.
BoelchSPStreckLEPlumhoffP, et al.Infection control and outcome of staged reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the management of shoulder infections. JSES Int2020; 4: 959–963.
21.
CoffeyMJElyEECrosbyLA. Treatment of glenohumeral sepsis with a commercially produced antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2010; 19: 868–873.
22.
CuffDJViraniNALevyJ, et al.The treatment of deep shoulder infection and glenohumeral instability with debridement, reverse shoulder arthroplasty and postoperative antibiotics. J Bone Joint Surg Br2008; 90: 336–342.
23.
GoettiPGallusserNAntoniadisA, et al.Advanced septic arthritis of the shoulder treated by a two-stage arthroplasty. World J Orthop2019; 10: 356–363.
24.
HattrupSJRenfreeKJ. Two-stage shoulder reconstruction for active glenohumeral sepsis. Orthopedics2010; 33: 20.
25.
KriechlingPBouaichaSAndronicO, et al.Limited improvement and high rate of complication in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for previous native shoulder infection. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2021; 30: 34–39.
26.
MagnanBBondiMVecchiniE, et al.A preformed antibiotic-loaded spacer for treatment for septic arthritis of the shoulder. Musculoskelet Surg2014; 98: 15–20.
27.
MorrisBJWaggenspackWNLaughlinMS, et al.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for management of postinfectious arthropathy with rotator cuff deficiency. Orthopedics2015; 38: e701–e707.
28.
PadegimasEMNicholsonTASilvaS, et al.Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty performed for postinfectious arthritis. Clin Orthop Surg2018; 10: 344–351.
29.
SchochBAllenBMiletiJ, et al.Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of postinfectious glenohumeral arthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2014; 23: 1327–1333.
30.
StineIALeeBZalavrasCG, et al.Management of chronic shoulder infections utilizing a fixed articulating antibiotic-loaded spacer. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2010; 19: 739–748.
31.
ThemistocleousGZalavrasCStineI, et al.Prolonged implantation of an antibiotic cement spacer for management of shoulder sepsis in compromised patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2007; 16: 701–705.
32.
TwissTJCrosbyLA. Treatment of the infected total shoulder arthroplasty with antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers. Semin Arthroplasty2010; 21: 204–208.
33.
ZhangALFeeleyBTSchwartzBS, et al.Management of deep postoperative shoulder infections: is there a role for open biopsy during staged treatment?J Shoulder Elbow Surg2015; 24: e15–e20.
34.
BohsaliKI. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am2006; 88: 2279.
35.
CancienneJMBrockmeierSFCarsonEW, et al.Risk factors for infection after shoulder arthroscopy in a large medicare population. Am J Sports Med2018; 46: 809–814.
36.
SperlingJWKozakTKWHanssenAD, et al.Infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res2001; 382: 206–216.
37.
BuchalterDBMahureSAMollonB, et al.Two-stage revision for infected shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2017; 26: 939–947.
38.
MastersJPMSmithNAFoguetP, et al.A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2013; 14: 222.
39.
KunutsorSKWhitehouseMRBlomAW, et al.Re-infection outcomes following one- and two-stage surgical revision of infected hip prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One2015; 10: e0139166.
40.
MutimerJGillespieGLoveringAM, et al.Measurements of in vivo intra-articular gentamicin levels from antibiotic loaded articulating spacers in revision total knee replacement. Knee2009; 16: 39–41.
41.
RamseyMLFenlinJM. Use of an antibiotic-impregnated bone cement block in the revision of an infected shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg1996; 5: 479–482.
42.
CosteJSReigSTrojaniC, et al.The management of infection in arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br2004; 86: 65–69.
43.
MercurioMCastioniDIannòB, et al.Outcomes of revision surgery after periprosthetic shoulder infection: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2019; 28: 1193–1203.
44.
RuditskyAMcBethZCurryEJ, et al.One versus 2-stage revision for shoulder arthroplasty infections: A systematic review and analysis of treatment selection bias. JBJS Rev2021; 9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00219
45.
TsengWJLansdownDAGraceT, et al.Outcomes of revision arthroplasty for shoulder periprosthetic joint infection: a three-stage revision protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2019; 28: 268–275.
46.
BarcoRSavvidouODSperlingJW, et al.Complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev2016; 1: 72–80.
47.
FavardLLevigneCNerotC, et al.Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time?Clin Orthop Relat Res2011; 469: 2469–2475.
48.
BoisAJKnightPAlhojailanK, et al.Clinical outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty used for failed prior shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JSES Int2020; 4: 156–168.
49.
SinghJASperlingJBuchbinderR, et al.Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2010; CD008089.
50.
WallBNové-JosserandLO’ConnorDP, et al.Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am2007; 89: 1476–1485.
