Surgical outcomes and complication rates of arthroscopic-assisted fixation versus open fixation for coronoid fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2025
Surgical outcomes and complication rates of arthroscopic-assisted fixation versus open fixation for coronoid fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Coronoid fractures often occur with complex elbow dislocations, accounting for 15% of elbow fractures. The effectiveness of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus arthroscopic-assisted reduction internal fixation (ARIF) surgeries for coronoid fractures remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of these two surgical approaches in treating varus posteromedial injuries.
Methods
This study was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO. The primary outcomes assessed in this study were the functional outcomes measured by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the complications associated with each surgical approach.
Results
Analysis of the data from 759 patients included in this study revealed that the mean postoperative MEPS score was higher in the ARIF group compared to the ORIF group (97.5 Vs. 90.7), with the mean improvement in MEPS was 16.6 points (19 for ORIF and 14.3 for ARIF). The complication rate in the ORIF group was 24.6%, while the ARIF group reported a complication rate of 6%.
Conclusion
This study suggests that ARIF surgery can yield comparable and promising outcomes to ORIF surgery for coronoid fractures.
ThayerMKSwensonAKHackettDJ, et al.Classifications in brief: Regan-Morrey classification of coronoid fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res2018; 476: 1540–1543.
2.
O’DriscollSW. Elbow instability. Hand Clin1994; 10: 405–415.
3.
LanzerathFHacklMWegmannK, et al.The treatment of anteromedial coronoid facet fractures: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2021; 30: 942–948.
4.
KumarDSodavarapuPKumarK, et al.Functional outcome of surgically treated isolated coronoid fractures with elbow dislocation in young and active patients. Cureus2020; 12: e10883.
5.
de KlerkHHRingDBoerboomL, et al.Coronoid fractures and traumatic elbow instability. JSES Int2023; 7: 2587–2593.
6.
ParkSMLeeJSJungJY, et al.How should anteromedial coronoid facet fracture be managed? A surgical strategy based on O’Driscoll classification and ligament injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2015; 24: 74–82.
7.
WellsJAbloveRH. Coronoid fractures of the elbow. Clin Med Res2008; 6: 40–44.
8.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev2021; 10: 1–11.
9.
RingDJupiterJB. Fracture-dislocation of the elbow. Hand Clin2002; 18: 55–63.
10.
SlimKNiniEForestierD, et al.Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg2003; 73: 712–716.
11.
HowickJChalmersILindJ, et al.Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence, http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 (accessed 11 January 2023).
12.
DoornbergJNRingD. Coronoid fracture patterns. J Hand Surg2006; 31: 45–52.
13.
LiuGHuJMaW, et al.Surgical treatment for terrible triad injury of the elbow with anteromedial coronoid fracture through a combined surgical approach. J Int Med Res2018; 46: 3053–3064.
14.
RauschVNeugebauerSLeschingerT, et al.Injuries to the coronoid process of the ulna with involvement of the lesser sigmoid notch. Z Orthop Unfall2022; 160: 35–39.
15.
MorellatoJLouatiHDeslogesW, et al.Fixation of anteromedial coronoid facet fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of plated versus screw constructs. J Orthop Trauma2018; 32: e451–e456.
16.
BudoffJEMeyersDNAmbroseCG. The comparative stability of screw versus plate versus screw and plate coronoid fixation. J Hand Surg Am2011; 36: 238–245.
17.
ManidakisNSperelakisIHackneyR, et al.Fractures of the ulnar coronoid process. Injury2012; 43: 989–998.
18.
HanSHYoonHKRheeSY, et al.Anterior approach for fixation of isolated type III coronoid process fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol2013; 23: 395–405.
19.
RhyouIHKimKCLeeJH, et al.Strategic approach to O’Driscoll type 2 anteromedial coronoid facet fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2014; 23: 924–932.
20.
MallardFHubertLSteigerV, et al.An original internal fixation technique by tension band wiring with steel wire in fractures of the coronoid process. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2015; 101: S211–S215.
21.
ChenHWangZLiJ, et al.Treatment of the coronoid process fractures with anteromedial approach: a case report. Int J Clin Exp Med2015; 8: 19607–19611.
22.
FengDZhangXJiangY, et al.Plate fixation through an anterior approach for coronoid process fractures. Medicine (Baltimore)2018; 97: e12041.
23.
YangXChangWChenW, et al.A novel anterior approach for the fixation of ulnar coronoid process fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2017; 103: 899–904.
24.
ChenHWTengXF. A comparative study on the validity and reliability of anterior, medial, and posterior approaches for internal fixation in the repair of fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna. Eur J Med Res2018; 23: 40.
25.
McLeanJKempstonMPPikeJM, et al.Varus posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow: injury pattern and surgical experience of 27 acute consecutive surgical patients. J Orthop Trauma2018; 32: e469–e474.
26.
KowRYZakariaZMKhanESKM, et al.Isolated Regan-Morrey type III fracture of the ulnar coronoid process: a report of two cases. J Orthop Case Rep2018; 8: 65–67.
27.
ChenACYWengCJChouYC, et al.Anteromedial fractures of the ulnar coronoid process: correlation between surgical outcomes and radiographic findings. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2018; 19: 248.
28.
WangYMengQWuJ, et al.Treatment of fractures of the ulnar coronoid process. Orthop Surg2009; 1: 269–274.
29.
KangLQDingZQShaM, et al.A minimally invasive anterior approach to reduction and screw fixation of coronoid fractures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol2010; 35: 224–227.
30.
ChenHWHeHHGaoBL. Efficacy of internal fixation with mini plate and internal fixation with hollow screw for Regan-Morrey type II and III ulna coronoid fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2018; 19: 194.
31.
KlugABuschbeckSGramlichY, et al.Good outcome using anatomically pre-formed buttress plates for anteromedial facet fractures of the coronoid—a retrospective study of twenty-four patients. Int Orthop2019; 43: 2817–2824.
32.
ShenJJQiuQMGaoYB, et al.Direct anterior approach for mini plate fixation of Regan–Morrey type II comminuted ulnar coronoid process fracture. J Orthop Surg2019; 27: 230949901882522.
33.
YanRWuYXiangZ, et al.A novel suture-preset spring plate system (SSPS) for comminuted coronoid process fracture in the elbow. Orthop Surg2022; 14: 2580–2590.
34.
OhWTDoWSOhJC, et al.Comparison of arthroscopy-assisted vs. open reduction and fixation of coronoid fractures of the ulna. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2021; 30: 469–478.
35.
DowdyPBainGKingG, et al.The midline posterior elbow incision. An anatomical appraisal. J Bone Joint Surg Br1995; 77: 696–699.
36.
EnglertCZellnerJKollerM, et al.Elbow dislocations: a review ranging from soft tissue injuries to complex elbow fracture dislocations. Adv Orthop2013; 2013: 1–11.
37.
AdamsJEMertenSMSteinmannSP. Arthroscopic-assisted treatment of coronoid fractures. Arthroscopy2007; 23: 1060–1065.
38.
LeeJMYiYKimJW. Arthroscopically assisted surgery for coronoid fohractures. Orthopedics2015; 38: 742–746.
39.
DomosPAscioneFWallaceAL. Arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage for non-engaging Hill-Sachs lesion in professional collision athletes. Shoulder Elbow2019; 11: 17–25.
40.
FournierMCorningEWittA, et al.Arthroscopically assisted fixation of terrible triad variant injuries of the elbow with small-bore needle arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech2021; 10: e1469–e1474.
41.
ChoiCHSeokHGParkSG. Arthroscopic reduction and fixation of coronoid fractures with bending K-wire: a new technique. J Clin Med2022; 11: 4964.
42.
MillsLAAitkenSASimpsonAHRW. The risk of non-union per fracture: current myths and revised figures from a population of over 4 million adults. Acta Orthop2017; 88: 434–439.
43.
ShuklaDRPillaiGMcAnanyS, et al.Heterotopic ossification formation after fracture-dislocations of the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2015; 24: 333–338.
44.
AgarwalSLoderSBrownleyC, et al.Inhibition of Hif1α prevents both trauma-induced and genetic heterotopic ossification. Proc Natl Acad Sci2016; 113: E338–E347.
45.
MeyersCLisieckiJMillerS, et al.Heterotopic ossification: a comprehensive review. JBMR Plus2019; 3: e10172.
46.
XuYHuangMHeW, et al.Heterotopic ossification: clinical features, basic researches, and mechanical stimulations. Front Cell Dev Biol2022; 10: 770931.
47.
SorkinMHuberAKHwangC, et al.Regulation of heterotopic ossification by monocytes in a mouse model of aberrant wound healing. Nat Commun2020; 11: 722.
48.
Sanchez-SoteloJMorreyM. Complex elbow instability: surgical management of elbow fracture dislocations. EFORT Open Rev2016; 1: 183–190.
49.
PughDMWWildLMSchemitschEH, et al.Standard surgical protocol to treat elbow dislocations with radial head and coronoid fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am2004; 86: 1122–1130.
50.
KarbachLEElfarJ. Elbow instability: anatomy, biomechanics, diagnostic maneuvers, and testing. J Hand Surg Am2017; 42: 118–126.
51.
HausmanMRKlugRAQuereshiS, et al.Arthroscopically assisted coronoid fracture fixation: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res2009; 466: 3147–3315.
52.
ArrigoniPD’AmbrosiRCucchiD, et al.Arthroscopic fixation of coronoid process fractures through coronoid tunnelling and capsular prication. Joints2016; 4: 153–158.
53.
OuyangKWangDLuW, et al.Arthroscopic reduction and fixation of coronoid fractures with and exchange rod-a new technique. 2017; 12: 9.
54.
ShimadaNShirakiltKSaitaK. Arthroscopic osteosynthesis for the treatment of coronoid process fractures: a case series. Case Rep Orthop2018; 19: 8512963.
55.
ColozzaAMenozziMPernaL, et al.Results of arthroscopically assisted reduction and fixation of anteromedial facet coronoid fractures at short-term follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2022; 31: 1890–1897.
56.
ChenHWHuangMS. Risk factors of efficacy for patients receiving surgical treatment following terrible triad of the elbow joint: a comparative study. Medicine (Baltimore)2019; 98: 13836.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
