This study aims to review the functional outcomes of patients managed by the application of the Wrightington elbow fracture-dislocation classification system and its corresponding management algorithms.
Methods
This is a retrospective consecutive case series of patients over the age of 16 with an elbow fracture-dislocation managed according to the Wrightington classification. The primary outcome was the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at the last follow-up. Range of movement (ROM) and complications were collected as a secondary outcome.
Results
Sixty patients qualified for inclusion (32 female, 28 male) with a mean age of 48 years (19–84). Fifty-eight (97%) patients completed a minimum of three months follow-up. Mean follow-up was six months (3–18). The median MEPS at the final follow-up was 100 (interquartile range [IQR] 85–100) and median ROM of 123° (IQR 101–130) degrees. Four patients underwent secondary surgery and had improved outcomes with the average MEPS score improving from 65 to 94 following the second surgery.
Conclusions
The results of this study show that good outcomes can be achieved for complex elbow fracture-dislocations through pattern recognition and management with an anatomically based reconstruction algorithm as described by the Wrightington classification system.
WyrickJDDaileySKGunzenhaeuserJM, et al.Management of complex elbow dislocations: a mechanistic approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2015; 23: 297–306.
5.
RingDJupiterJBSimpsonNS. Monteggia fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am1998; 80: 1733–1744.
6.
AthwalGSRamseyMLSteinmannSP, et al.Fractures and dislocations of the elbow: a return to the basics. Instr Course Lect2011; 60: 199–214.
7.
BuijzeGKloenP. Clinical evaluation of locking compression plate fixation for comminuted olecranon fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am2009; 91: 2416–2420.
8.
BrobergMAMorreyBF. Results of treatment of fracture-dislocations of the elbow. Clin Orthop1987; 216: 109–119.
9.
CobbTKMorreyBF. Use of distraction arthroplasty in unstable fracture dislocations of the elbow. Clin Orthop1995; 312: 201–210.
10.
JosefssonPOGentzCFJohnellO, et al.Dislocations of the elbow and intraarticular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res1989; 246: 126–130.
11.
WattsACSinghJElveyM, et al.Current concepts in elbow fracture dislocation. Shoulder Elbow2021; 13: 451–458.
12.
RashidACopasDGranville-ChapmanJ, et al.Arthroscopically-assisted fixation of anteromedial coronoid facet fracture and lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair for acute posteromedial rotatory fracture dislocation of the elbow. Shoulder Elbow2019; 11: 378–383.
13.
McKeeRCMcKeeMD. Complex fractures of the proximal ulna: the critical importance of the coronoid fragment. Instr Course Lect2012; 61: 227–233.
14.
RouleauDMFaberKJAthwalGS. The proximal ulna dorsal angulation: a radiographic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2010; 19: 26–30.
15.
MehtaJABainGI. Surgical approaches to the elbow. Hand Clin2004; 20: 375–387.
16.
SchreiberJJPaulSHotchkissRN, et al.Conservative management of elbow dislocations with an overhead motion protocol. J Hand Surg Am2015; 40: 515–519.
17.
LiuGHuJMaW, et al.Surgical treatment for terrible triad injury of the elbow with anteromedial coronoid fracture through a combined surgical approach. J Int Med Res2018; 46: 3053–3064.
18.
ReganWMorreyBF. Classification and treatment of coronoid process fractures. Orthopedics1992; 15: 845–848.
19.
O'DriscollSWJupiterJBCohenMS, et al.Difficult elbow fractures: pearls and pitfalls. Instr Course Lect2003; 52: 113–134.
20.
HamoodiZSinghJElveyMH, et al.Reliability and validity of the Wrightington classification of elbow fracture-dislocation. Bone Joint J2020; 102–B: 1041–1047.
21.
CameronPSyedHPhadnisJ. BESS Abstracts: radiographic and CT characteristics of coronoid fractures and inter-observer reliability of coronoid fracture classification. Shoulder Elbow2019; 11: S5–S30.
22.
ParkSMLeeJSJungJY, et al.How should anteromedial coronoid facet fracture be managed? A surgical strategy based on O'Driscoll classification and ligament injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2015; 24: 74–82.
23.
DoornbergJNRingDC. Fracture of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid process. J Bone Joint Surg Am2006; 88: 2216–2224.
BadoJL. The monteggia lesion. Clin Orthop Relat Res1967; 50: 71–86.
26.
RingD. Monteggia fractures. Orthop Clin North Am2013; 44: 59–66.
27.
AdamsJEHoskinTLMorreyBF, et al.Management and outcome of 103 acute fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Br2009; 91: 632–635.
28.
BousselmameNBoussougaMBouabidS, et al.Les fractures de l'apophyse coronoïde [fractures of the coronoid process]. Chir Main2000; 19: 286–293.
29.
ReganWMorreyB. Fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am1989; 71: 1348–1354.
30.
RingDJupiterJBSandersRW, et al.Transolecranon fracture-dislocation of the elbow. J Orthop Trauma1997; 11: 545–550.
31.
McKeeMDPughDMWildLM, et al.Standard surgical protocol to treat elbow dislocations with radial head and coronoid fractures. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am2005; 87): 22–32.
32.
PughDMWildLMSchemitschEH, et al.Standard surgical protocol to treat elbow dislocations with radial head and coronoid fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am2004; 86: 1122–1130.
33.
MasonML. Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases. Br J Surg1954; 42: 123–132.
34.
JohnstonGW. A follow-up of one hundred cases of fracture of the head of the radius with a review of the literature. Ulster Med J1962; 31: 51–56.
35.
RingD. Displaced, unstable fractures of the radial head: fixation vs. replacement—what is the evidence?Injury2008; 39: 1329–1337.
36.
TejwaniNCMehtaH. Fractures of the radial head and neck: current concepts in management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2007; 15: 380–387.
37.
ItamuraJRoidisNMirzayanR, et al.Radial head fractures: MRI evaluation of associated injuries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2005; 14: 421–424.
38.
Van RietRPMorreyBF. Documentation of associated injuries occurring with radial head fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res2008; 466: 130–134.
