Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging in patients with complex glenoid wear patterns and bone loss. Severe retroversion (>15°) or significant bone loss may require bone grafting. This review summarizes the rate of revision and long-term outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with bone graft.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases was conducted from the date of inception to 23 October 2018. Two reviewers independently screened articles for eligibility and extracted data for analysis. The primary outcome was rate of revision. The secondary outcomes were rate of component loosening, functional outcome, and range of motion.

Results

Of the 1056 articles identified in the search, 26 underwent full-text screening and 7 articles were included in the analysis. All procedures were one-stage anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties. The rate of revision was 5.4% with component loosening and infection listed as indications over a weighted mean follow-up period of 6.3 years. Complications occurred in 12.6% of patients.

Conclusion

Glenoid bone grafting in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty results in comparable revision rates and improvement in pain compared to augmented glenoid components and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Due to the low quality of evidence, further prospective studies should be conducted.

Level of evidence

Keywords

Shoulder bone grafting total shoulder arthroplasty bone deficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bade

Warren

Ranawat

, et al.Long term results of Neer total shoulder replacement. In: Bateman

Welsh

(eds). Surgery of the shoulder, St Louis: B. C. Decker and C. V. Mosby, 1984, pp. 294–294.

Bade

Ranawat

Inglis

. Total shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4: 105–113.

Barrett W, Franklin J, Jackins S, et al. Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1987; 69: 865–872.

Brenner

Ferlic

Clayton

, et al. Survivorship of unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 1289–1296.

Cofield

. Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66: 899–906.

Inglis

Ranawat

Figgie

, et al. An analysis of factors affecting the long-term results of total shoulder arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3: 123–130.

Neer

Watson

Stanton

. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 319–337.

Wilde

Borden

Brems

Experience with the Neer total shoulder replacement. In: Bateman

Welsh

(eds). Surgery of the shoulder, St Louis: B. C. Decker and C. V. Mosby, 1984, pp. 224–228.

Sabesan

Callanan

, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty with bone graft for osteoarthritis with severe glenoid bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: 1290–1296.

10.

Nicholson

Cvetanovich

Rao

, et al. Posterior glenoid bone grafting in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe posterior glenoid wear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26: 1844–1853.

11.

Hill

Norris

. Long-term results of total shoulder arthroplasty following bone-grafting of the glenoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 877–883.

12.

Song

Grogan

Jobin

. Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for severe glenoid bone loss: still a viable option. Semin Arthroplasty. Epub ahead of print 1 November 2018. DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2018.10.005.

13.

Higgins

Green

. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). Cochrane Collab 2011, pp. 10–11.

14.

Moher

Liberati

TJ AD . The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264–269.

15.

Slim

Nini

Forestier

, et al. Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73: 712–716.

16.

Wright

Swiontkowski

Heckman

. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1–3.

17.

Gazielly

Scarlat

Verborgt

. Long-term survival of the glenoid components in total shoulder replacement for arthritis. Int Orthop 2014; 37: 1093–1098.

18.

Steinmann

Cofield

. Bone grafting for glenoid deficiency in total shoulder replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000; 9: 361–367.

19.

Klika

Wooten

Sperling

, et al. Structural bone grafting for glenoid deficiency in primary total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23: 1066–1072.

20.

Neer

Morrison

. Glenoid bone-grafting in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70: 1154–1162.

21.

Aldinger

Raiss

Rickert

, et al. Complications in shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 485 cases. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 517–524.

22.

Chin

PYK

Sperling

Cofield

, et al.

Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty: are they fewer or different?

J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 19–22.

23.

Habermeyer

Lichtenberg

Tauber

, et al. Midterm results of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 1463–1472.

24.

Lenart

Namdari

Williams

. Total shoulder arthroplasty with an augmented component for anterior glenoid bone deficiency. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 398–405.

25.

Favorito

Freed

Passanise

, et al. Total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis associated with posterior glenoid bone loss: results of an all-polyethylene, posteriorly augmented glenoid component. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 1681–1689.

26.

Jones

Wright

Roche

. Bone grafting the glenoid versus use of augmented glenoid baseplates with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2015; 73: S129–S135.

27.

Hsu

Ricchetti

Huffman

, et al. Addressing glenoid bone deficiency and asymmetric posterior erosion in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22: 1298–1308.

28.

Paul

Maldonado-Rodriguez

Docter

, et al. Glenoid bone grafting in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 2447–2456.

29.

Kocher MS, Horan MP, Briggs KK, Richardson TR, O'Holleran J, Hawkins RJ. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 2005; 87(9 I): 2006–2011.

30.

Iossifidis A, Ibrahim EF, Petrou C, Galanos A. The development and validation of a questionnaire for rotator cuff disorders: The Functional Shoulder Score. Shoulder Elb [Internet]. 2015 Oct 1 [cited 2020 Apr 1]; 7(4): 256–267. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582986.

31.

Leggin BG, Michener LA, Shaffer MA, Brenneman SK, Iannotti JP, Williams GR. The Penn Shoulder Score: Reliability and validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 200; 36(3): 138–151.

32.

Tingart M, Bäthis H, Lefering R, Bouillon B, Tiling T. [Constant Score and Neer Score. A comparison of score results and subjective patient satisfaction]. Unfallchirurg. 2001.

33.

Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJH, S½jbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: Modifications and guidelines for its use [Internet]. Vol. 17, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008 [cited 2020 Apr 1]. p. 355–361.

34.

Lippitt S, Harryman D, Matsen F. A practical tool for evaluating function: the Simple Shoulder Test. The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability. Am Acad Orthop Surg 1993; 501–518.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

Glenoid bone grafting in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material