External rotation bracing for first-time anterior dislocation of the shoulder: A discontinued randomised controlled trial comparing external rotation bracing with conventional sling

Abstract

Introduction

Itoi et al. introduced the concept of bracing in abduction and external rotation to treat traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations. However, controversy remains as studies have reported variable results. Our study investigates whether there is a difference in outcomes between treatment with a conventional sling or external rotation brace.

Methods

A prospective, multi-centre randomised control trial was conducted between 2006 and 2010. The study was discontinued early with 72 (36 cases in each group) first-time anterior shoulder dislocations recruited.

Results

The re-dislocation rate over 24 months was comparable 30% (95% CI: 17–47) sling vs. 24% (95% CI: 13–41) external rotation bracing. Sixteen percent (95% CI: 7–32) of sling patients and 12% (95% CI: 5–27) of external rotation-bracing patients had shoulder stabilisation surgery within 24 months of the initial dislocation (p > 0.05). There was no difference in OSI scores at 24 months between the two treatment groups and intolerability of the external rotation brace was high.

Conclusion

Recruitment to this study was difficult, and lost-to-follow-up rates were high leading to early discontinuation of the study. The results suggest that ER bracing is unlikely to provide clinical benefit in traumatic first-time anterior shoulder dislocation.

Keywords

anterior shoulder dislocation external rotation bracing sling immobilisation discontinued randomised control trial

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bigliani

Kelkar

Flatow

et al.

Glenohumeral stability. Biomechanical properties of passive and active stabilizers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 330: 13–30.

Kazár

Relovszky

. Prognosis of primary dislocation of the shoulder. Acta Orthop Scand 1969; 40: 216–24.

Rowe

. Prognosis in dislocations of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1956; 38–A: 957–77.

Bankart

ASB

. Recurrent or habitual dislocation of the shoulder-joint. Br Med J 1923; 2: 1132–1133.

Hill

Sachs

. The grooved defect of the humeral head: a frequently unrecognized complication of dislocations of the shoulder joint. Radiology 1940; 35: 690–700.

Simonet

Cofield

. Prognosis in anterior shoulder dislocation. Am J Sport Med 1984; 12: 19–24.

Hovelius

Rahme

. Primary anterior dislocation of the shoulder: long-term prognosis at the age of 40 years or younger. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24: 330–342.

Itoi

Sashi

Minagawa

et al.

Position of immobilization after dislocation of the glenohumeral joint. A study with use of magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83–A: 661–667.

Itoi

Hatakeyama

Sato

et al.

Immobilization in external rotation after shoulder dislocation reduces the risk of recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 2124–2131.

10.

Itoi

Hatakeyama

Urayama

et al.

Position of immobilization after dislocation of the shoulder. A cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 385–390.

11.

Siegler

Proust

Marcheix

PSM

et al.

Is external rotation the correct immobilisation for acute shoulder dislocation? An MRI study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96: 329–333.

12.

Königshausen

Schliemann

Schildhauer

et al.

Evaluation of immobilization in external rotation after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: 5-year results. Musculoskelet Surg 2014; 98: 143–151.

13.

Taskoparan

Tunay

Kilinçoglu

et al.

Immobilization of the shoulder in external rotation for prevention of recurrence in acute anterior dislocation. Acta Orthop Traumalogica Turc 2010; 44: 278–284.

14.

Heidari

Asadollahi

Vafaee

et al.

Immobilization in external rotation combined with abduction reduces the risk of recurrence after primary anterior shoulder dislocation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23: 759–766.

15.

Finestone

Milgrom

Radeva-Petrova

et al.

Bracing in external rotation for traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91: 918–921.

16.

Liavaag

Brox

Pripp

et al.

Immobilization in external rotation after primary shoulder dislocation did not reduce the risk of recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 897–904.

17.

Vavken

Sadoghi

Quidde

et al.

Immobilization in internal or external rotation does not change recurrence rates after traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23: 13–9.

18.

Whelan

Litchfield

Wambolt

et al.

External rotation immobilization for primary shoulder dislocation: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 2380–2386.

19.

Hanchard

Goodchild

Kottam

. Conservative management following closed reduction of traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 4: CD004962–CD004962.

20.

Liu

Xue

Chen

et al.

The external rotation immobilisation does not reduce recurrence rates or improve quality of life after primary anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 2014; 45: 1842–1847.

21.

Wüst

Kieser

. Including long-and short-term data in blinded sample size recalculation for binary endpoints. Comput Stat Data Anal 2005; 48: 835–55.

22.

Paterson

Throckmorton

Koester

et al.

Position and duration of immobilization after primary anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 2924–2933.

23.

Hovelius

Augustini

Fredin

et al.

Primary anterior dislocation of the shoulder in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 1677–1684.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB

0.26 MB