Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

One potential limitation of interpreting the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) in longitudinal studies is that the observed score may be influenced by age and other variables, which may change over time. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of increasing age and unreported non-shoulder upper limb and neck symptoms on the OSS.

Methods

We collected OSS data from a sample of our ethnically diverse local population. All subjects indicated whether they suffered from any neck, shoulder, elbow or wrist symptoms for which they had not sought a medical opinion. Those reporting no symptoms formed the asymptomatic group.

Results

We found a significant decline in OSS with increasing age in the whole study population, as well as in both the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups with previously unreported symptoms: Spearman correlation coefficient = −0.27, −0.28 and −0.33 respectively (p < 0.001). The median OSS in the asymptomatic group was 48 [interquartile range (IQR) 48 to 48]. This was significantly higher than the symptomatic group, with a median OSS of 46 (IQR 40 to 47) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We found the OSS to be affected by non-shoulder upper-limb and neck pathology as well as age. Within the limitations of the OSS, the differences we found do not exceed the minimal important change.

Keywords

age influence noise non-shoulder upper limb Oxford Shoulder Score

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dawson

Fitzpatrick

Carr

. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 593–600.

Dawson

Rogers

Fitzpatrick

et al.

The Oxford shoulder score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 119–123.

Rolfson

Bohm

Franklin

et al.

Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries. Acta Orthop 2016; 87(Suppl 1): 9–23.

Younis

Sultan

Dix

et al.

The range of the Oxford Shoulder Score in the asymptomatic population: a marker for postoperative improvement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93: 629–633.

Clement

Court-Brown

. Oxford shoulder score in a normal population. Int J Shoulder Surg 2014; 8: 10–14.

Katolik

Romeo

Cole

et al.

Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 279–285.

Yian

Ramappa

Arneberg

et al.

The Constant score in normal shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 128–133.

Hudak

Amadio

Bombardier

. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602–608.

Roquelaure

Leclerc

et al.

Epidemiologic surveillance of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the working population. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55: 765–78.

10.

Van Kampen

Willems

Van Beers

LWAH

et al.

Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). J Orthop Surg Res 2013; 8: 40–40.

The influence of age and unreported symptoms on the Oxford Shoulder Score

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References