The objective of this study was to estimate the population density of five dove species: Rock pigeon (Columba livia), Red-billed pigeon (Patagioenas flavirostris), Eurasian collared-dove (Streptopelia decaocto), White-winged dove (Zenaida asiatica), and Mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) within the riparian corridor of the Sinaloa River, located in the municipality of Guasave, Sinaloa. The perpendicular distance sampling method was applied using line transects, with a total survey effort of 58.5 km conducted between March and November 2024. Data were analyzed using Distance software, and species-specific detection models were constructed. Parametric (Welch ANOVA and Tukey HSD) and non-parametric (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U with Bonferroni correction) statistical analyses were performed to assess differences in density among species and across seasons of the year. Results indicated that White-winged dove was the most abundant and widely distributed species, with a mean density of 744.03 individuals/km2, significantly higher than that of the other species. Seasonal variation was observed in White-winged dove, with the highest density during the breeding season in spring and the lowest in autumn, reflecting changes in resource availability and local movements rather than long-term population trends. The remaining species exhibited lower densities and more restricted distributions, with Rock pigeon showing localized presence along the waterfront promenade in the urban area of Guasave, and Red-billed pigeon being sparsely represented throughout the riparian corridor. These findings underscore the ecological importance of riparian corridors as key habitats for generalist species such as White-winged dove, and highlight the need for long-term monitoring of less abundant dove populations. The information generated is relevant for the design of conservation and management strategies for avifauna in agricultural and urban landscapes of northwestern Mexico.
BezrodnovaOBondarenkoZBrusentsovaN, et al.Creation of the “Berezivskyi” landscape reserve of local importance as a component of preservation of natural landscapes, biotopes and species diversity of the Northeast of Ukraine. J V.N. Karazin Kharkiv Natl Univ Ser Biol2024; 43: 116–131.
2.
Díaz-CastelblancoS. El libro del artista: Valoración de los conocimientos etnoecológicos, desde la relación biocultural entre la avifauna y las comunidades asentadas en el área de influencia de la Laguna de Fúquene “Siguasinga” - Vereda Chinzaque. Bachelor's thesis, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Colombia, 2024.
3.
FreitasJLCaballero-RiveroAMascarenhas e SilvaFA produção científica sobre a biodiversidade da região Central Serrana do Espírito Santo In: RamosEPachecoDAndrade de LacerdaJV (eds) Boletim do Museu de Biologia Prof. Mello Leitão – Série INMA. 1st ed.Santa Teresa: Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica, 2024, pp.28–42.
4.
GavaliPBanuJS. A novel approach to Indian bird species identification: employing visual-acoustic fusion techniques for improved classification accuracy. Front Artif Intell2025; 8: 1527299.
5.
ElfidasariDPuspitasariRLKhairullahAH, et al.Conservation status of bird collection in Ragunan Wildlife Park Jakarta. Int J Fauna Biol Stud2024; 11: 91–98.
6.
Villalba-SánchezCDe La Ossa-LacayoADe La OssaVJ. Densidad de Paloma Doméstica (Columba livia domestica GMELIN, 1789) en el Antiguo Mercado Público de Sincelejo, Sucre, Colombia. Rev Asoc Colomb Cienc Biol2015; 27: 72–79.
7.
Villalba-SánchezCDe La Ossa-LacayoADe La OssaVJ. Density of Domestic Pigeons (Columba livia domestica GMELIN, 1789) in the New Public Market of Sincelejo, Sucre, Colombia. Rev UDCA Act Divulg Cient2015; 18: 497–502.
8.
QuinterosCZSánchez-InfantasETovar-SerpaH. Relación entre la abundancia relativa y densidad real en tres poblaciones de aves. Ecol Apl2002; 1: 95–104.
9.
OtienoNEOyiekeHOgomaM, et al.Bird density and distribution patterns in relation to anthropogenic habitat modification around an East African estuary. West Indian Ocean J Mar Sci2011; 10: 191–200.
10.
LowtherPEJohnstonRF. Rock Pigeon (Columba livia), version 1.0. In: BillermanSM (eds) Birds of the World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.rocpig.01
11.
RoseENagelPHaag-WackernagelD. Spatio-temporal use of the urban habitat by feral pigeons (Columba livia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol2006; 60: 242–254.
12.
García-ArroyoMGómez-MartínezMAMacGregor-ForsI. The queen of the island: On the density and distribution of the Eurasian Collared-Dove (Streptopelia decaocto) in Cozumel. Urban Ecosyst2022; 25: 285–290.
13.
RomagosaCMMlodinowSG. Eurasian Collared-Dove (Streptopelia decaocto), version 1.1. In: PylePRodewaldPGBillermanSM (eds) Birds of the World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.eucdov.01.1
14.
SchwertnerTWMathewsonHARobersonJA, et al.White-winged Dove (Zenaida asiatica), version 1.0. In: PooleAFGillFB (eds) Birds of the World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.whwdov.01
15.
SchumanMJSnyderSLSmoakCH, et al.Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) hatchlings found in the diet of the invasive Cane Toad (Rhinella marina) in Florida. Southeast Nat2021; 20: N115–N118.
16.
OtisDLSchulzJHMillerD, et al.Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura), version 1.0. In: PooleAF (ed) Birds of the World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.moudov.01
17.
BreedenJBSmallMFBaccusJT, et al.Vegetative composition of areas with and without breeding Red-Billed Pigeons (Patagioenas flavirostris) in Texas. Southwest Nat2009; 54: 68–73.
18.
LowtherP. E.BreedenJ.EitniearJ. C. (2020). Red-billed Pigeon (Patagioenas flavirostris), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (RodewaldP. G., Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.rebpig1.01
19.
BucklandSTAndersonDRBurnhamKP, et al.Distance sampling: Estimating abundance of biological populations. 1st ed.London: Chapman & Hall, 1993, p. 440.
20.
HedleySLBucklandST. Spatial distance sampling models. In: BucklandSTAndersonDRBurnhamKP, et al. (eds) Advanced Distance Sampling. 1st ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp.48–70.
21.
Pérez-GranadosCBarreroATrabaJ, et al.Assessment of cue counting for estimating bird density using passive acoustic monitoring: Recommendations for estimating a reliable cue rate. Avian Conserv Ecol2021; 16: 11.
22.
FletcherRJDhundaleJADeanTF. Estimating non-breeding season bird abundance in prairies: A comparison of two survey techniques. J Field Ornithol2000; 71: 321–329.
23.
MarquesTAThomasLFancySG, et al.Improving estimates of bird density using multiple covariate distance sampling. Auk2007; 124: 1229–1243.
24.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Prontuario de información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. 1st ed.Aguascalientes: INEGI, 2009, p.1.
25.
Granados-SánchezDHernándezGLópezR. Ecología de las zonas ribereñas. Rev Chapingo Ser Cienc For Amb2006; 12: 55–69.
26.
Alanís-RodríguezERubio-CamachoEACanizales-VelázquezPA, et al.Estructura y diversidad de un bosque de galería en el noreste de México. Rev Mex Cienc For2020; 11: 134–153.
27.
RalphCJGeupelGRPyleP, et al.Manual de métodos de campo para el monitoreo de aves terrestres. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-159. Albany, CA: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 1996, p.46.
28.
DunnJLAlderferJ. National Geographic Field Guide to the Birds of North America. 7th ed.Washington, D.C.: National Geographic, 2017, p.592.
ThomasLBucklandSTRexstadEA, et al.Distance software: Design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J Appl Ecol2010; 47: 5–14.
32.
BucklandSTAndersonDRBurnhamKP, et al.Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. 1st ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, p.432.
33.
CrumNJNeymanLCGowanTA. Abundance estimation for line transect sampling: A comparison of distance sampling and spatial capture-recapture models. PLoS ONE2021; 16: e0252231.
34.
Favela-MestaJ. Importancia de los corredores riparios en los patrones y ampliaciones de distribución: un ejemplo de tres especies de aves en la cuenca San Pedro Mezquital, Durango, México. Acta Zool Mex (nueva ser)2025; 41: 1–22.
35.
HammerØHarperDATRyanPD. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electron2001; 4: 1–9.
36.
MorenoCEBarragánFPinedaE, et al.Reanálisis de la diversidad alfa: alternativas para interpretar y comparar información sobre comunidades ecológicas. Rev Mex Biodivers2011; 82: 1249–1261.
37.
Castillo-MuñozMGuzmán-HernándezJL. Composición y estructura de la comunidad de aves en un corredor ribereño urbano del área metropolitana de Monterrey, Nuevo León, México. Huitzil2021; 22: e628.
38.
Ahumada-CervantesRGonzález-MárquezLCCota-MontesD, et al.Riqueza y diversidad de la avifauna del río Sinaloa en Guasave, Sinaloa, México. Acta Zool Lilloana2024; 68: 437–462.
39.
De Carvalho BragaCAPrevedelloJAPiresMRS. Effects of cornfields on small mammal communities: a test in the Atlantic Forest hotspot. J Mammal2015; 96: 938–945.
40.
JaufmannESchmidHHülsbergenKJ. Soil carbon accrual and yield response to biochar and compost in a four-year organic field study. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst2025; 130.
41.
SmallMFVeechJABaccusJT. A comparison of Zenaida asiatica densities estimated during morning and evening surveys. J Fish Wildl Manag2012; 3: 158-163.
42.
Haag-WackernagelDMochH. Health hazards posed by feral pigeons. J Infect2004; 48: 307–313.
43.
FarfánMADíaz-RuizFDuarteJ, et al.Feral pigeon (Columba livia var. domestica) management in low-density urban areas: prevention is better than cure. Urban Ecosyst2019; 22: 1027–1035.
44.
TangQLowGWLimJY, et al.Human activities and landscape features interact to closely define the distribution and dispersal of an urban commensal. Evol Appl2018; 11: 1598-1608.
45.
MüllerNIgnatievaMNilonCH, et al.Patterns and trends in urban biodiversity and landscape design. In: ElmqvistTFragkiasMGoodnessJ, et al. (eds) Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. 1st ed.Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp.123–145.
46.
MuñozDMillerD. Human-dominated land cover corresponds to spatial variation in Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) reproductive output across the United States. Condor Ornithol Appl2020; 122: 1-11.
47.
GeisslerPHDoltonDDFieldR, et al.Mourning Dove Nesting: Seasonal Patterns and Effects of September Hunting. US Dep Inter Fish Wildl Serv Resour Publ1987; 168: 1-33.
48.
EraudCBoutinJMRouxD, et al.Spatial dynamics of an invasive bird species assessed using robust design occupancy analysis: the case of the Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto) in France. J Biogeogr2007; 34: 1077-1086.
49.
BledFRoyleJACamE. Hierarchical modeling of an invasive spread: the Eurasian Collared Dove (Streptopelia decaocto) in the United States. Ecol Appl2011; 21: 290-302.
50.
Maya-ElizarrarásEMaya-ElizarrarásLM. Confirmación de presencia, registro de anidación, variación estacional de la densidad y uso de recursos para percha de la paloma turca (Streptopelia decaocto; Frivaldszky, 1838) en Morelia, Michoacán, México. Acta Zool Mex (nueva ser)2018; 34: 1-12.
51.
Buitrón-JuradoGSanzV. Specialization increases in a frugivorous bird–plant network from an isolated montane forest remnant. Community Ecol2021; 22: 261–274.
