Land use and land cover change are the direct causes of the loss of biodiversity, causing species to be threatened in the form of habitat loss and increased chance of extinction from competition between closely related species for limited resources. We used multispecies occupancy modeling to determine the influence of environmental and habitat features on Bulbuls occupancy and interactions between closely related Bulbul species and their occupancy in the presence or absence of other species. During the study, five species of bulbuls were recorded; four belong to the Pycnonotus genus, and the single species belongs to the genus Hypsipetes. Due to the low detection of Square-tailed Bulbul Hypsipetes ganeesa and Yellow-throated Bulbul Pycnonotus xantholaemus, they were not selected for occupancy modeling. Marginal occupancy was estimated for the following three species: Red-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer (Ψ = 0.7229 ± 0.06194 CI: 0.5805–0.8144), Red-whiskered Bulbul Pycnonotus jocosus (Ψ = 0.8023 ± 0.05884 95% CI: 0.6669–0.8844), and White-browed Bulbul Pycnonotus luteolus (Ψ = 0.6602 ± 0.04742 CI: 0.567–0.7458). Conditional occupancy was estimated in the presence or absence of closely related species, and there is no negative interaction between closely related species. We identified environmental variables that affect species presence and absence in the Eastern Ghats. NDVI, canopy cover, agricultural land and plantations are the variables that significantly affect Red-vented Bulbul occupancy probability. The presence of Red-whiskered Bulbul was significantly influenced by dense forest and plantations. Elevation, NDVI, tree height, agricultural land, moderate forest, shrub and plantation are the environmental variables that affect the species occupancy of White-browed Bulbul.
MorrisonJCSechrestWDinersteinE, et al. Persistence of Large Mammal Faunas as Indicators of Global Human Impacts. J Mammal. 2007; 88: 1363–1380.
2.
IsaacJ. Effects of climate change on life history: implications for extinction risk in mammals. Endanger Species Res. 2009; 7: 115–123.
3.
JantzSMBarkerBBrooksTM, et al. Future habitat loss and extinctions driven by land‐use change in biodiversity hotspots under four scenarios of climate-change mitigation. Conserv Biol. 2015; 29: 1122–1131.
4.
SándorADDomşaC. Climate change, predictive modelling and grassland specialists: assessing impacts of changing climate on the long-term conservation of Lesser Grey Shrikes (Lanius minor) in Romania. J Ornithol. 2017; 159: 413–424.
5.
CeballosGEhrlichPR. Mammal Population Losses and the Extinction Crisis. Science2002; 296: 904–907.
6.
MichalskiFPeresCA. Anthropogenic determinants of primate and carnivore local extinctions in a fragmented forest landscape of southern Amazonia. Biol Conserv. 2005; 124: 383–396.
7.
LaliberteASRippleWJ. Range Contractions of North American Carnivores and Ungulates. Bioscience2004; 54: 123.
8.
JhaAVasudevanK. Environmental Niche Modelling of Globally Threatened Yellow-Throated Bulbul, Pycnonotus xantholaemus; for Conservation Prospects in the Deccan Peninsula, India. Curr Sci. 2020; 119: 1815.
9.
AlkemadeRVan OorschotMMilesL, et al.GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss. Ecosystems2009; 12: 374–390.
10.
DeFriesRSFoleyJAAsnerGP. Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Front Ecol Environ. 2004; 2: 249–257.
11.
EppsCWMutayobaBMGwinL, et al. An empirical evaluation of the African elephant as a focal species for connectivity planning in East Africa. Divers Distrib. 2011; 17: 603–612.
12.
SchuettePWagnerAPWagnerME, et al. Occupancy patterns and niche partitioning within a diverse carnivore community exposed to anthropogenic pressures. Biol Conserv. 2013; 158: 301–312.
13.
BibbyCJ. Recent past and future extinctions in birds. Philos Trans R Soc B. 1994; 344: 35–40.
14.
PrimackRB. Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates Incorporated. USA. 2006.
15.
NguyenMH. Bird Composition as an Ecological Indicator of Forest Disturbance Levels. Honours Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, USA.2007.
16.
RameshTDownsCT. Land use factors determining occurrence of Red-necked Spurfowl (Pternistis afer) in the Drakensberg Midlands, South Africa. J Ornithol. 2014; 155: 471–480.
17.
GorMP (2018) Ecological study of red vented bulbul pycnonotus cafer, Doctoral thesis, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University, India, 2018.
18.
FishpoolLDCTobiasJA. Family Pycnonotidae. In del HoyoJ.ElliottA.SargatalJ. (eds) Handbook of the Birds of the World, Lynx Edicions/Birdlife International, 2005.
19.
WangYChenSBlairRB, et al. Nest composition adjustments by Chinese Bulbuls Pycnonotus sinensis in an urbanized landscape of Hangzhou (E China). Acta Ornithol. 2009; 44: 185–192.
20.
IslamKWilliamsRN. Red-vented Bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer). The Birds of North America2000; 20: 1-24.
21.
TomGPraveenJ. Bird diversity of Melagiris, A study of the Avifauna of Melagiri Hills, Hosur Forest Division, Tamil Nadu forest department. Report, Kenneth Anderson Nature Society, India. February 2014.
22.
ManawatthanaSLaosinchaiPOnparnN, et al. Phylogeography of bulbuls in the genus Iole (Aves: Pycnonotidae). Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2017; 120: 931–944.
23.
RasmussenPCAndertonJC. Birds of South Asia : the Ripley guide. Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions. 2005.
24.
DavidJPDanielsRJRBalasubramanianV. A reassessment of the avian species diversity in the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, after the Vernay Survey. J Threat Taxa. 2017; 9: 10538.
25.
GrimmettRInskippCInskippT. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Bloomsbury Publishing, India. 2016.
26.
FinkDAuerTJohnstonA, et al.eBird Status and Trends. eBird Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. 2023.
27.
RecherHFDavisWECalverMC. Comparative foraging ecology of five species of ground-pouncing birds in western Australian woodlands with comments on species decline. Ornithol Sci. 2002; 1: 29–40.
28.
HinoTUnnoANakanoS. Prey distribution and foraging preference for tits. Ornithol Sci. 2002; 1: 81–87.
29.
KhanZSushmaHBPA, et al. Habitat determinants of species occupancy and niche partitioning among sympatric owlets: the paradoxical role of agricultural lands for the endangered Forest Owlet, Athene blewitti. J Field Ornithol. 2023; 94: 2.
30.
JaysonEASivaramM. Ecology and behaviour of Forest Owls in the Western Ghats and developing a habitat model for their conservation. Research Report No.343. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Thrissur, India, October 2009.
31.
BrooksDM. Ecology, behavior, and reproduction of an introduced population of Red-vented Bulbuls (Pycnonotus cafer) in Houston, Texas. Wilson J Ornithol. 2013; 125: 800–808.
32.
NowakowskiJDuliszB. The Red-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer (Linnaeus, 1766) – a new invasive bird species breeding in Europe. Bioinvasions Rec. 2019; 8: 947–952.
33.
JayakumarSRamachandranABhaskaranG, et al. Forest Dynamics in the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Manage. 2008; 43: 326–345.
34.
DavidJPVinothB. Nocturnal birds in the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu. Indian Birds2016; 11, 39-41.
35.
MacKenzieDINicholsJDLachmanGB, et al.Estimating site occupancy when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology2002; 83: 2248–2255.
36.
MacKenzieDINicholsJDRoyleJA, et al. Occupancy modeling and estimation. San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press, 2006.
37.
RotaCTFletcherRJDorazioRM, et al. Occupancy estimation and the closure assumption. J Appl Ecol. 2009; 46: 1173–1181.
38.
ZipkinEFDeWanARoyleJA. Impacts of forest fragmentation on species richness: a hierarchical approach to community modelling. J Appl Ecol. 2009; 46: 815–822.
39.
ToblerMWHartleyAZCarrillo-PercasteguiSE, et al. spatiotemporal hierarchical modelling of species richness and occupancy using camera trap data. J Appl Ecol. 2015; 52: 413–421.
40.
RotaCTFerreiraM a. RKaysRW, et al. A multispecies occupancy model for two or more interacting species. MEE. 2016; 7: 1164–1173.
41.
BajaruSPalSPrabhuM, et al.A multi-species occupancy modeling approach to access the impacts of land use and land cover on terrestrial vertebrates in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), Western Ghats, India. PloS One2020; 15: e0240989.
42.
KaranthKKNicholsJDHinesJE, et al. Patterns and determinants of mammal species occurrence in India. J Appl Ecol. 2009; 46: 1189–1200.
43.
AmbasthaKRJhaCS. Geospatial analysis of Tamil Nadu Eastern Ghats forest types at landscape level with reference to fragmentation and species diversity. Photonirvachak2010; 38: 453–463.
44.
PullaiahTRaoDM. Flora of Eastern Ghats : Vol 1: Hill Ranges of South East India. Daya Books, India. 2002.
45.
RamachandranARadhapriyaPJayakumarS, et al.Critical Analysis of Forest Degradation in the Southern Eastern Ghats of India: Comparison of Satellite Imagery and Soil Quality Index. PloS One2016; 11: e0147541.
46.
ChampionHGSethSK. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Govt. of India Press, New Delhi. 1968.
47.
BibbyCJJonesMMarsdenS. Expedition Field Techniques: Bird Surveys. Royal Geographical Society, London. 1998.
U.S. Geological Survey. Landsat 9 satellite image (Product ID: LC09_L2SP_143052_20230221_20230309_02_T1). https://doi.org/10.5066/P9OGBGM6. (2023, accessed 21 September 2023).
50.
NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Global. Distributed by OpenTopography. https://doi.org/10.5069/G9445JDF. (2013, accessed 18 July 2023).
51.
FiskeIChandlerR. unmarked: An R Package for Fitting Hierarchical Models of Wildlife Occurrence and Abundance. J Stat Softw. 2011; 43.
52.
BurnhamKPAndersonDR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York. 2002.
53.
MazerolleMJ. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference Based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.3.3. 2023.
54.
KadavulKDixitAK. Ethnomedicinal studies of the woody species of Kalrayan & Shervarayan Hills, Eastern Ghats, Tamil Nadu. IJTK. 2009; 8(4): 592–597.
55.
HofARJanssonRNilssonC. The usefulness of elevation as a predictor variable in species distribution modelling. Ecol Modell. 2012; 246: 86–90.
56.
ThibaultMVidalEPotterMA, et al.The invasive Red-vented bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer) outcompetes native birds in a tropical biodiversity hotspot. PloS One2018; 13: e0192249.
57.
GrarockKTidemannCRWoodJ, et al.Is It Benign or Is It a Pariah? Empirical Evidence for the Impact of the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) on Australian Birds. PloS One2012; 7: e40622.
58.
SinghHShariefAJoshiBD, et al. Multi-species occupancy modeling suggests interspecific interaction among the three ungulate species. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1).
59.
GrahamCHMoermondTCKristensenKA, et al.Seed Dispersal Effectiveness by Two Bulbuls on Maesa lanceolata, an African Montane Forest Tree. Biotropica1995; 27: 479.
60.
CorlettRT. “Frugivory and seed dispersal by birds in Hong Kong shrub land.” Forktail1998; 13:23–27.
61.
CorlettRT. Frugivory and seed dispersal by vertebrates in tropical and subtropical Asia: An update. GECCO. 2017; 11: 1–22.
62.
PriceTD. The Seasonality and Occurrence of Birds in the Eastern Ghats of Andhra Pradesh India. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 1979; 76: 379–422.
63.
DasKSA. Breeding ecology and life history characteristics of three sympatric bulbuls aves pycnonotidae in the silent valley national park in the western ghats, Doctoral Thesis, MES Mampad College, University of Calicut, India, 2021.
CarletonAROwreOT. The Red-Whiskered Bulbul in Florida: 1960-71, The Auk, Volume 92, Issue 1, 1 January 1975, Pages 40–57.
66.
DeshwalAStephensonSLPanwarP, et al. Foraging habitat selection of shrubland bird community in tropical dry forest. Ecol Evol. 2022; 12: 8.
67.
BoyceAJMartinTE. Interspecific aggression among parapatric and sympatric songbirds on a tropical elevational gradient. Behav Ecol. 2019; 30: 541–547.
68.
MacArthurRHMacArthurJWPreerJ. On Bird Species Diversity. II. Prediction of Bird Census from Habitat Measurements. Am Nat. 1962; 96: 167–174.
69.
ArnoldG. The Effects of Habitat Structure and Floristics on the Densities of Bird Species in Wandoo Woodland. Wildl Res. 1988; 15: 499.
70.
KumaraHNBabuSRaoGB, et al. Responses of birds and mammals to long-established wind farms in India. Sci Rep. 2022; 12: 1339.
71.
WillsonMF. Avian Community Organization and Habitat Structure. Ecology1974; 55: 1017–1029.
72.
KumarA. Communication value of displays and postures in Red-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer (Aves: Pycnonotidae). J Threat Taxa. 2010; 2: 919–929.
73.
VijayanVS. Breeding biology of bulbuls, Pycnonotus cafer and Pycnonotus luteolus (Class: Aves, Family: Pycnonotidae) with special reference to their ecological isolation. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 1980; 75: 1090–1117.
74.
LiHZhangM-XYangX-J, et al. The breeding biology of Red-Whiskered Bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus) in Xishuangbanna, southwest China. Zool Res. 2015; 36: 233–240.
75.
BalakrishnanP. Reproductive biology of the Square-tailed Black Bulbul Hypsipetes ganeesa in the Western Ghats, India. Indian Birds2010; 5:5: 134–138.
76.
JhaAVasudevanK. Demographic history of the fragmented Yellow-throated Bulbul (Pycnonotus xantholaemus) population in the Deccan Peninsula, India. Endanger Species Res. 2020; 43: 199–207.
77.
MoM. The Red-whiskered Bulbul Pycnonotus jocosus in Australia – a global perspective, history of introduction, current status and potential impacts. Aust Zool. 2015; 37: 461–471.
78.
VijayanVS. Ecological isolation of Bulbuls with special reference to Pycnonotus cafer cafer and P. luteolus luteolus at Point Calimere, Tamil Nadu. PhD Thesis. University of Bombay, Mumbai, India. 1975.
79.
JayakumarSArockiasamyDIBrittoSJ. Estimates of current status of forest types in Kolli Hill using remote sensing. Photonirvachak2000; 28: 141–151.
80.
ConnellJH. Diversity and the evolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos1980; 35: 131-138.
81.
HaywardMWSlotowR. Temporal Partitioning of Activity in Large African Carnivores: Tests of Multiple Hypotheses. S Afr J Wildl Res. 2009; 39: 109–125.
82.
KamtaejaSSitasuwanNChomdejS, et al.Species-distinctiveness in the vocal behaviour of six sympatric bulbuls (genus Pycnonotus) in South-East Asia. Emu2012; 112: 199–208.
83.
OliverosCHMoyleRG. Origin and diversification of Philippine bulbuls. Mol Phylogenetics Evol. 2010; 54: 822–832.
84.
BalakrishnanP.Foraging Behaviour of the near Threatened Grey-headed Bulbul Pycnonotus Priocephalus in Relation to Seasons and Breeding Stages. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 2014; 111: 10.
85.
MarimuthuSS. Occupancy and distribution pattern of owls in Andaman Islands with special reference to community assembly rules. Doctoral Thesis, Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON), Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India. 2022.
86.
MansorMSRozaliFZDaviesS, et al. High-throughput sequencing reveals dietary segregation in Malaysian babblers. Curr Zool. 2021; 68: 381–389.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
