The quality of breeding habitat may directly affect the survival and development of progeny. Therefore, the selection of a suitable nest-site is an important factor affecting the reproductive success of birds. The most important reason for a bird’s reproductive failure is nest predation. Predation may cause birds to change their nest-sites and even nest morphology. Here we investigated the nest-site characteristics by long-tailed broadbills (Psarisomus dalhousiae) in Nonggang, Guangxi, southwestern China. Our results showed that long-tailed broadbills in Nonggang mainly build their nests on power lines (88.5%) and nest-site selection was mainly affected by predation pressure and food resources. At the same time, nest-site concealment was trade-off against predator avoidance. This anti-predator strategy effectively utilizes human infrastructure.
Ibáñez-ÁlamoJDMagrathRDOteyzaJC, et al. Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives. J Ornithol2015; 156: 247–262.
2.
GrüeblerMUMüllerMMichelVT, et al. Brood provisioning and reproductive benefits in relation to habitat quality: a food supplementation experiment. Anim Behav2018; 141: 45–55.
3.
ChalfounADSchmidtKA.Adaptive breeding-habitat selection: is it for the birds?Auk2012; 129: 589–599.
4.
MartinTE.Nest predation and nest-sites. BioScience1993; 43: 523–532.
5.
LimaSL.Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol Rev2009; 84: 485–513.
6.
SchneiderNAGriesserM.Incubating females use dynamic risk assessment to evaluate the risk posed by different predators. Behav Ecol2012; 24: 47–52.
7.
ChotprasertkoonTPierceAJSaviniT, et al. Influence of vegetation cover on nest cavity selection and nesting success of White-rumped Shamas (Copsychus malabaricus): an experimental test. Wilson J Ornithol2017; 129: 727–741.
8.
MøllerAP.The fitness benefit of association with humans: elevated success of birds breeding indoors. Behav Ecol2010; 21: 913–918.
9.
LiangWYangCWangL, et al. Avoiding parasitism by breeding indoors: cuckoo parasitism of hirundines and rejection of eggs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol2013; 67: 913–918.
10.
MøllerAPDíazMLiangW.Brood parasitism and proximity to human habitation. Behav Ecol2016; 27: 1314–1319.
11.
JenkinsARSmallieJJDiamondM.Avian collisions with power lines: a global review of causes and mitigation with a South African perspective. Bird Conserv Int2010; 20: 263–278.
12.
BevangerK.Biological and conservation aspects of bird mortality caused by electricity power lines: a review. Biol Conserv1998; 86: 67–76.
13.
LehmanRNKennedyPLSavidgeJA.The state of the art in raptor electrocution research: a global review. Biol Conserv2007; 136: 159–174.
14.
D’AmicoMCatryIMartinsRC, et al. Bird on the wire: landscape planning considering costs and benefits for bird populations coexisting with power lines. Ambio2018; 47: 650–656.
15.
ChevallierCHernández-MatíasARealJ, et al. Retrofitting of power lines effectively reduces mortality by electrocution in large birds: an example with the endangered Bonelli’s eagle. J Appl Ecol2015; 52: 1465–1473.
16.
VaitkuvienėDDagysM.Possible effects of electromagnetic field on White Storks Ciconia ciconia breeding on low-voltage electricity line poles. Zool Ecol2014; 24: 289–296.
17.
MoreiraFMartinsRCCatryI, et al. Drivers of power line use by white storks: a case study of birds nesting on anthropogenic structures. J Appl Ecol2018; 55: 2263–2273.
18.
AveryMLLindsayJRNewmanJR, et al. Reducing monk parakeet impacts to electric utilities in South Florida. Adv Vertebr Pest Manage2006; 4: 125–136.
19.
ReedJEMccleeryRASilvyNJ, et al. Monk parakeet nest-site selection of electric utility structures in Texas. Lands Urban Plan2014; 129: 65–72.
20.
YangCHuangQWangL, et al. Plaintive cuckoos do not select tailorbird hosts that match the phenotypes of their own eggs. Behav Ecol2016; 27: 835–841.
21.
ZhengG.A checklist on the classification and distribution of the birds of China. 3rd ed.Beijing: Science Press, 2017.
22.
del HoyoJElliottAChristieDA, et al. Handbook of the birds of the world. Volume 8: Broadbills to tapaculos. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, 2003.
23.
BakerECS. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Birds. Vol. 3. 2nd ed.London: Taylor and Francis, 1926.
ThompsonPMChowdhurySUHaqueEU, et al. Notable bird records from Bangladesh from July 2002 to July 2013. Forktail2014; 30: 50–65.
26.
IsakssonCRodewaldADGilD.Behavioural and ecological consequences of urban life in birds. Front Ecol Evol2018; 6: 50.
27.
RytwinskiTFahrigL.Why are some animal populations unaffected or positively affected by roads?Oecologia2013; 173: 1143–1156.
28.
LapiedraOSchoenerTWLealM, et al. Predator-driven natural selection on risk-taking behavior in anole lizards. Science2018; 360: 1017–1020.
29.
GötmarkFBlomqvistDJohanssonOC, et al. Nest site selection: a trade-off between concealment and view of the surroundings?J Avian Biol1995; 26: 305–312.
30.
van KolfschotenLSelvenoSStarkDJ, et al. Nest density of the black-and-red broadbill (Cymbirhynchus macrorhyncos) along the Kinabatangan River, in relation to riverine habitat reduction. J Trop Biol Conserv2016; 13: 157–168.
31.
SmythiesBE.The birds of Borneo. Revised by DavisonG. W. H.4th ed.Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications, 1999.
32.
TryjanowskiPSparksTHJerzakL, et al. A paradox for conservation: electricity pylons may benefit avian diversity in intensive farmland. Conserv Lett2014; 7: 34–40.
33.
BurgerJGochfeldM.Nesting behavior and nest site selection in monk parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus) in the Pantanal of Brazil. Acta Ethol2005; 8: 23–34.
34.
MartínLFBucherEH.Natal dispersal and first breeding age in monk parakeets. Auk1993; 110: 930–933.
35.
EberhardJ.Nest adoption by monk parakeets. Wilson Bull1996; 108: 374–377.
36.
JiangAJiangDGoodaleE, et al. Nest predation on birds that nest in rock cavities in a tropical limestone forest of southern China. Global Ecol Conserv2017; 10: 154–158.
37.
JaniszewskiTMiniasPWojciechowskiZ.Selective forces responsible for transition to nesting on electricity poles in the white storkCiconia ciconia. Ardea2015; 103: 39–50.
