Modern game birds rearing methods use mechanical incubators to hatch eggs and artificial brooders to intensively rear birds. However, the lack of parental care can have consequences on behavior and welfare of these birds affecting also survival after their release in the wild. In this study, we compared the response of 4-week-old young pheasants (brooded by a foster mother hen and artificially brooded) to two behavioral tests (duration of tonic immobility and response to aerial predator). Tonic immobility was significantly different between the two groups of birds indicating a higher level of fear in artificially brooded pheasants compared to brooded pheasants. Pheasants brooded by a foster hen showed a stronger response to aerial predator compared to artificially brooded pheasants. The foster hen seems to have a positive effect on pheasant chicks’ behavior reducing the fear and improving the ability to perceive threats.
SokosCKBirtsasPKTsachalidisEP.The aims of galliforms release and choice of techniques. Wildl Biol2008; 14(4): 412–422.
2.
BrittasRMarcströmVKenwardREet al. Survival and breeding success of reared and wild ring-necked pheasants in Sweden. J Wildlife Manage1992; 56: 368–376.
3.
BunerFSchaubM.How do different releasing techniques affect the survival of reintroduced grey partridges Perdix perdix?Wildlife Biol2008; 14(1): 26–35.
SantilliFGalardiLBagliaccaM.First evaluation of different captive rearing techniques for the re-establishment of the red legged partridge populations. Avian Biol Res2012; 5(3): 147–153.
6.
RobertsonPAMillA CRushtonSPMcKenzieAJet al. Pheasant release in Great Britain: long-term and large-scale changes in the survival of a managed bird. Eur J Wildlife Res2017; 63(6): 100.
7.
MorganKNTromborgKN. Sources of stress in captivity. App Anim Behav Sci2007; 102(3–4): 262–302.
8.
MasonGJ.Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method. Trends Ecol Evol2010; 25(12): 713–721.
PérezJASánchez-GarcíaCDíezCet al. Are parent-reared red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa) better candidates for re-establishment purposes?Poult Sci2015; 94(10): 2330–2338.
11.
HåkanssonJJensenP.Behavioural and morphological variation between captive populations of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus)—possible implications for conservation. Biol Cons2005; 122(3): 431–439.
12.
McBrideGParerIPFoenanderF.The social organization and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Anim Behav Monogr1969; 2: 125–181.
13.
EdgarJHeldSJonesCet al. Influences of maternal care on chicken welfare. Animals (Basel)2016; 6(1): E2.
14.
CampoJLDávilaSGGilMG.Comparison of the tonic immobility duration, heterophil to lymphocyte ratio, and fluctuating asymmetry of chicks reared with or without a broody hen, and of broody and non-broody hens. App Anim Behav Sci2014; 151: 61–66.
15.
GallupGGJr. Tonic immobility as a measure of fear in domestic fowl. Anim Behav1979; 27: 316–317.
16.
HillDRobertsonP.The pheasant: ecology, management and conservation. Oxford: BSP Professional Books, 1988.
17.
RodenburgTBKomenHEllenEDet al. Selection method and early-life history affect behavioural development, feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens: a review. App Anim Behav Sci2008; 110(3): 217–228.
18.
BunerFDBrowneSJAebischerNJ.Experimental assessment of release methods for the re-establishment of a red-listed galliform, the grey partridge (Perdix perdix). Biol Cons2011; 144(1): 593–601.
19.
MurphyLB.The practical problems of recognizing and measuring fear and exploration behaviour in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav1978; 26: 422–431.
20.
FerrettiMFalciniFPaciGet al. Captive rearing technologies and survival of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus L.) after release. It J Anim Sci2012; 11(2): e29.
21.
ForkmanBBoissyAMeunier-SalaünMCet al. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol Behav2007; 92(3): 340–374.
22.
GhareebKNiebuhrKAwadWAet al. Stability of fear and sociality in two strains of laying hens. Br Poult Sci2008; 49(5): 502–508.
23.
JonesRB.Tonic immobility in the domestic fowl: a descriptive profile. App Anim Behav Sci1986; 15(2): 182.
24.
JonesRB.Assessment of fear in adult laying hens: correlational analysis of methods and measures. Br Poult Sci1987; 28(2): 319–326.
25.
JonesRB.The nature of handling immediately prior to test affects tonic immobility fear reactions in laying hens and broilers. App Anim Behav Sci1992; 34(3): 247–254.
26.
JonesRBFaureJM. Tonic immobility (righting time) in the domestic fowl: effects of various methods of induction. IRSC Med Sci1980; 8: 184–185.
27.
AltanÖPabuçcuoğluAAltanAet al. Effect of heat stress on oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation and some stress parameters in broilers. Br Poult Sci2003; 44(4): 545–550.
FavatiAZidarJThorpeHet al. The ontogeny of personality traits in the red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Behav Ecol2015; 27(2): 484–493.
30.
MobergGP.Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In: MobergGPMenchJA (eds) The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. New York: CABI Publishing, 2000, pp. 1–21.
31.
ShimmuraTKamimuraEAzumaTet al. Effect of broody hens on behaviour of chicks. App Anim Behav Sci2010; 126(3): 125–133.
32.
El-LetheyHJungiTWHuber-EicherB.Effects of feeding corticosterone and housing conditions on feather pecking in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Physiol Behav2001; 73(1–2): 243–251.
33.
HohtolaE.Tonic immobility and shivering in birds: evolutionary implications. Physiol Behav1981; 27(3): 475–480.
34.
PerréYWautersAMRichard-YrisMA.Influence of mothering on emotional and social reactivity of domestic pullets. App Anim Behav Sci2002; 75(2): 133–146.
35.
RodenCWechslerB.A comparison of the behaviour of domestic chicks reared with or without a hen in enriched pens. App Anim Behav Sci1998; 55(3–4): 317–326.
36.
BertinARichard-YrisMA.Mothering during early development influences subsequent emotional and social behaviour in Japanese quail. J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol2005; 303(9): 792–801.
37.
PittetFLe BotOHoudelierCet al. Motherless quail mothers display impaired maternal behavior and produce more fearful and less socially motivated offspring. Dev Psychobiol2014; 56(4): 622–634.
38.
De MargerieEPerisAPittetFet al. Effect of mothering on the spatial exploratory behavior of quail chicks. Dev Psychobiol2013; 55(3): 256–264.
39.
LiuDDiorioJDayJCet al. Maternal care, hippocampal synaptogenesis and cognitive development in rats. Nat Neurosci2000; 3(8): 799.
40.
BoissyA.Fear and fearfulness in animals. Q Rev Biol1995; 70(2): 165–191.
41.
BrowneSJBunerFAebischerNJ.A review of gray partridge restocking in the UK and its implications for the UK biodiversity action plan. Nat Quail Symp Proc2009; 6(1): 40.
