Organización Mundial de la Salud. Informe Mundial sobre el envejecimiento y la salud [Internet]. Ginebra: OMS; 2015 [citado el 18 de septiembre del 2023 set 18]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/publications/i/item/9789241565042
PrinceMJWuFGuoYGutierrez RobledoLMO’DonnellMSullivanR, et al. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet [Internet]. 2014 [citado el 6 de noviembre del 2024]; 6736: 1–14. Disponible en: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673614613477
6.
Naciones Unidas. Declaración Política y Plan de Acción Internacional de Madrid sobre el Envejecimiento [Internet]. Nueva York: Naciones Unidas; 2003 [citado el 8 de septiembre del 2023]. Disponible en: http://undesadspd.org/Portals/0/ageing/documents/Fulltext-SP.pdf
7.
World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Aging and Life Course. Active Ageing: En Policy Framework [Internet]. Ginebra: OMS; 2002 [citado el 8 de enero del 2023]. Disponible en: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf
8.
FriedmanSMMulhausenPClevelandMLCuelloPPDanielKMHaywardAD, et al. Healthy aging: American geriatrics society white paper executive summary. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019; 67: 17–20.
ResnickBZimmermanS. Gerontological Society of America COVID-19 Task Force. COVID-19 recommendations for research from the gerontological society of America COVID-19 task force. Gerontologist. 2021; 61: 137–140.
12.
National Prevention Council. Healthy Aging in Action. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2016.
13.
Bosch-FarréCMalagón-AguileraMCBallester-FerrandoDBertran-NoguéCBonmatí-TomàsAGelabert-VilellaS, et al. Healthy ageing in place: Enablers and barriers from the perspective of the elderly. A qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 6451.
14.
ManierreM.Successful present, successful future? Assessment of a nonbinary model of successful aging. Gerontologist [Internet]. 2019 [citado el 11 de julio del 2024]; 59: 727–737. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29309575/
RoweJW.Successful aging: evolution of a concept. J Nutr Health Aging. 2023; 27: 194–195.
17.
Comisión de las comunidades europeas. Abordar los efectos del envejecimiento de la población de la UE (Informe de 2020 sobre el envejecimiento demográfico) [Internet]. Bruselas: CSIC; 2020 [citado el 24 de mayo del 2022]. Disponible en: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/demography_report_2020_n.pdf
18.
CofiñoRAviñoDBenedéCBBotelloBCubilloJMorganA, et al. Promoción de la salud basada en activos: ¿cómo trabajar con esta perspectiva en intervenciones locales?Gac Sanit. 2016; 30(S1): 93–98.
19.
EronenJPortegijsERantakokkoMRantanenT.Leisure activities and life-space mobility in older people. Gerontologist. 2016; 56: 544. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw162.2196
20.
PitilinEBMassaroliALuzardoARLentsckMHBaratieriTGasparinVA.Factors associated with leisure activities of elderly residents in rural areas. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020; 73: e20190600.
21.
PardasaniM.Motivation to volunteer among senior center participantes. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2018; 61: 313–333.
BruntAStrommenJStanglCH.Reinventing the traditional senior center in rural areas to attract a new generation of individuals. Act Adapt Aging. 2020; 44: 1–17.
24.
CollinsBKeyesLLiQRivera-TorresS.Senior center service utilization: do social ties affect participation patterns?J Appl Gerontol. 2020; 41: 526–533.
25.
BickerdikeLBoothAWilsonPMFarleyKWrightK.Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open. 2017; 7: e013384.
26.
CaelliKRayLMillJ.Clear as mud: toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods [Internet]. 2003 [citado el 2 de julio del 2023]; 2: 1–13. Disponible en: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/160940690300200201
27.
KahlkeRM.Generic qualitative approaches: pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. Int J Qual Methods. 2014; 13: 37–52.
28.
Instituto de Estadística de Cataluña. Datos de población [Internet]. Barcelona: Idescat; 2023 [citado el 8 de junio del 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.idescat.cat/emex/?id=170499
29.
KruegerRACaseyMA.Focus Groups Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th Ed.Minnesota: Sage; 2014.
30.
MalterudKSiersmaVDGuassoraAD.Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016; 26: 1753–1760.
31.
BraunVClarkeV.Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3: 77–101.
32.
O’BrienBCHarrisIBBeckmanTJReedDACookDA.Standards para reporting qualitative research: en synthesis of recommendations. Acad med. 2014; 89: 1245–1251.
33.
BarbourRSKitzingerJ.Developing Focus Group Research: Polítics, Theory and Practice. London: Sage; 1999.
34.
PardasaniMBerkmanC.New York City senior centers: who participates and why?J Appl Gerontol. 2021; 40: 985–996.
35.
AdayRHWallaceBKrabillJJ.Linkages between the senior center as a public place and successful aging. Act Adapt Aging. 2019; 43: 211–231.
WeilJ.The New Neighborhood Senior Center: Redefining Social and Service Roles for the Baby Boom Generation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2014.
40.
BaileyCAitkenDWilsonGHodgsonPDouglasBDockingR.“¿What? that’s for old people, that.” Home adaptations, ageing and stigmatisation: a qualitative inquiry. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16: 4989.
41.
LytleALevySR.Reducing ageism: education about aging and extended contact with older adults. Gerontologist. 2019; 59: 580–588.
42.
BurnesDSheppardCHendersonCRJrWasselMCopeRBarberoC, et al. Interventions to reduce ageism against older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health Res. 2019; 109: e1–e9.
43.
KimSHParkS.A meta-analysis of the correlates of successful aging in older adults. Res Aging. 2017; 39: 657–677.
44.
HowarthMGriffithsAde SilvaAGreenR.Social prescribing: a ‘natural’ community-based solution. Br J Community Nurs. 2020; 25: 294–298.