This article explores the role of population health intervention research (PHIR) in enhancing health promotion in France, stressing the importance of a more in-depth understanding and thorough analysis of healthcare interventions. Established in 2022, the So-RISP network aims to structure the PHIR field, consolidating expertise from renowned teams specializing in PHIR, primary cancer prevention, and addiction. In January 2023, So-RISP members convened a national workshop. The workshop aimed to share the specificities of PHIR and particularly to clarify the use of theories in PHIR. A qualitative analysis of this workshop was conducted to aid in building a shared and well-defined knowledge base for PHIR stakeholders. Results highlight the necessity of developing a unified terminology and increasing reflexivity among PHIR stakeholders for enhanced effectiveness. The article also identifies key challenges, including the need for interdisciplinary collaboration, facilitating social transformation, and integrating various contexts in intervention analysis.
JourdanDPotvinL éds. Global Handbook of Health Promotion Research, Vol. 3: Doing Health Promotion Research [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 5]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-20401-2
2.
CambonLTerralPAllaF.From intervention to interventional system: towards greater theorization in population health intervention research. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 339.
3.
SchloemerTDe BockFSchröder-BäckP.Implementation of evidence-based health promotion and disease prevention interventions: theoretical and practical implications of the concept of transferability for decision-making and the transfer process. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021; 64: 534–543.
4.
CambonLAllaF.Transfer and sharing of public health knowledge?: reflections on the components of a national information system in France. Sante Publique (Bucur). 2013; 25: 757–762.
5.
DagenaisCMaloMRobertÉOuimetMBertheletteDRiddeV.Knowledge transfer on complex social interventions in public health: a scoping study. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e80233.
6.
PotvinLPetticrewMCohenERM. Population health intervention research: developing a much needed science of solutions. Prev Med. 2014; 61: 114–115.
7.
Government of Canada CI of HR. PHIRIC Publications & Resources - CIHR [Internet]. 2010. [cited 2018 Feb 12]. Available from: http://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41349.html#conf1
8.
AllaFKivitsJ.La recherche interventionnelle en santé publique: partenariat chercheurs-acteurs, interdisciplinarité et rôle social. Santé Publique. 2015; 27: 303–304.
9.
AllaFCambonL.Recherche interventionnelle en santé publique, transfert de connaissances et collaboration entre acteurs, décideurs et chercheurs. Quest Santé Publique. 2014; 12: 1–4.
10.
MooreGCambonLMichieSArwidsonPNinotGFerronC, et al. Population health intervention research: the place of theories. Trials. 2019; 20: 285.
11.
HawePPotvinL.What is population health intervention research?Can J Public Health. 2009; 100: 8–14.
12.
SkivingtonKMatthewsLSimpsonSACraigPBairdJBlazebyJM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021; 374: n2061.
13.
VillevalMGaboritEBeraultFLangTKelly-IrvingM.Do the key functions of an intervention designed from the same specifications vary according to context? Investigating the transferability of a public health intervention in France. Implement Sci. 2019; 14: 1–13.
14.
EdwardsNBarkerPM.The Importance of Context in Implementation Research. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014; 67: S157.
15.
HawePShiellARileyTGoldL.Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004; 58: 788–793.
16.
PfadenhauerLMGerhardusAMozygembaKLysdahlKBBoothAHofmannB, et al. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Implement Sci. 2017; 12: 1–17.
17.
ShovellerJViehbeckSDi RuggieroEGreysonDThomsonKKnightR.A critical examination of representations of context within research on population health interventions. Crit Public Health. 2016; 26: 487–500.
18.
CraigPDi RuggieroEFrohlichKLMykhalovskiyEWhiteMon behalf of the CIHR NIHR CGAG. Taking account of context in population health intervention research: guidance for producers, users and funders of research. NIHR Journals Library. 2018.
19.
MooreGCampbellMCopelandLCraigPMovsisyanAHoddinottP, et al. Adapting interventions to new contexts—the ADAPT guidance. BMJ. 2021; 374: n1679.
20.
O’CathainACrootLDuncanERousseauNSwornKTurnerKM, et al. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e029954.
TaylorAC. Invariants et variabilité en anthropologie. In:LautreyJMazoyerBVan GeertP (éds). Invariants etvariabilités dans les sciences cognitives. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme; 2017. pp.269–286.
23.
LubkeGHDolanCVKeldermanHMellenberghGJ.Weak measurement invariance with respect to unmeasured variables: an implication of strict factorial invariance. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2003; 56(Pt 2): 231–248.
24.
VillevalMGinsbourgerTBidaultEAliasFDelpierreCGaboritÉ, et al. L’interdisciplinarité en action : les « mots-pièges » d’une recherche interdisciplinaire. Santé Publique. 2014; 26: 155–163.
25.
CambonLAllaF. Understanding the complexity of population health interventions: assessing intervention system theory (ISyT). Health Res Policy Syst. 2021; 19: 95.
26.
DecroixCMartin-FernandezJCambonLRiddeVAllaF.Les défis de l’interdisciplinarité pour la recherche interventionnelle en santé des populations: le cas de la recherche VAPS. Rech Qual. 2023; 27: 190.
27.
KotlerPLeeN. Social Marketing: Influencing Behaviors for Good. Washington, DC: SAGE publications; 2008. p.457.
Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: final report of the commission on social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. p.247.
30.
Pan American Health Organization, Commission of the Pan American Health Organization on Equity and Health Inequalities in the Americas. Just Societies: Health Equity and Dignified Lives. Report of the Commission of the Pan American Health Organization on Equity and Health Inequalities in the Americas. Pan American Health Organization; 2019. [cited 2023 May 14] Available from: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/51571
31.
FillolAFonquerneLCambonLRiddeV.Pour une santé publique en faveur d’une justice épistémique. Glob Health Promot. 2023; 30: 62–66.
TremblayMCParentAA.Reflexivity in PHIR: let’s have a reflexive talk! Can J Public Health Rev Can Sante Publique. 2014; 105: e221–223.
34.
GodrieB.Rapports égalitaires dans la production des savoirs scientifiques. Vie Soc. 2017; 20: 99–116.
35.
GodrieBJuanMCarrelM.Recherches participatives et épistémologies radicales: un état des lieux. Participations. 2022; 32: 11–50.
36.
StewartRLangerLErasmusY.An integrated model for increasing the use of evidence by decision-makers for improved development. Dev South Afr. 2019; 36: 616–631.
