L’évaluateur et l’évaluation d’impact d’une intervention comme levier potentiel de l’ empowerment au niveau communautaire : un exercice réflexif à partir de l’intervention MAKASI
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2025
L’évaluateur et l’évaluation d’impact d’une intervention comme levier potentiel de l’ empowerment au niveau communautaire : un exercice réflexif à partir de l’intervention MAKASI
CambonLAllaF.Current challenges in population health intervention research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019; 73: 990–992.
2.
DahlgrenGWhiteheadM.Policies and Strategies to Promote Social Equity in Health. Background document to WHO - Strategy Paper for Europe. Arbetsrapport [Internet]. 1991 [cité le 2 février 2023]. Disponible sur: https://ideas.repec.org//p/hhs/ifswps/2007_014.html
3.
DahlgrenGWhiteheadM.The Dahlgren-Whitehead model of health determinants: 30 years on and still chasing rainbows. Public Health. 2021; 199: 20–24.
4.
DiderichsenFEvansTWhiteheadM.The social basis of disparities in health. In: EvansTWhiteheadMDiderichsenFBhuiyaAWirthM (éds). Challenging Inequities in Health: From Ethics to Action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001, pp.12–23.
5.
DiderichsenFHallqvistJWhiteheadM.Differential vulnerability and susceptibility: how to make use of recent development in our understanding of mediation and interaction to tackle health inequalities. Int J Epidemiol. 2019; 48: 268–274.
6.
CampbellMFitzpatrickRHainesAKinmonthALSandercockPSpiegelhalterD, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000; 321: 694–696.
7.
CraigPDieppePMacintyreSMichieSNazarethIPetticrewM.Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337: a1655.
8.
SkivingtonKMatthewsLSimpsonSACraigPBairdJBlazebyJM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021; 374: n2061.
9.
de SalazarLHallM.Developing evaluation questions: beyond the technical issues. In: PotvinLMcQueenDVHallMde SalazarLAndersonLMHartzZMA (éds). Health Promotion Evaluation Practices in the Americas: Values and Research. New York, NY: Springer; 2009, pp.49–62.
10.
PotvinLMcQueenDV.Practical dilemmas for health promotion evaluation. In: PotvinLMcQueenDVHallMde SalazarLAndersonLMHartzZMA (éds). Health Promotion Evaluation Practices in the Americas: Values and Research. New York, NY: Springer; 2009, pp.25–45.
11.
RootmanIGoodstadtM.Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives. World Health Organization: WHO Regional Office Europe;2001, pp.564.
12.
AlexanderSAJonesCMTremblayMCBeaudetNRodMHWrightMT.Reflexivity in health promotion: a typology for training. Health Promot Pract. 2020; 21: 499–509.
13.
FeredayJMuir-CochraneE.Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006; 5: 80–92.
14.
RobertsKDowellANieJB.Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19: 66.
15.
Desgrées-du-LoûAPannetierJRavalihasyAGosselinASupervieVPanjoH, et al. Sub-Saharan African migrants living with HIV acquired after migration, France, ANRS PARCOURS study, 2012 to 2013. Eurosurveillance. 2015; 20: 30065.
16.
Desgrees-du-LouAPannetierJRavalihasyALe GuenMGosselinAPanjoH, et al. Is hardship during migration a determinant of HIV infection? Results from the ANRS PARCOURS study of sub-Saharan African migrants in France. AIDS Lond Engl. 2016; 30: 645–656.
17.
GosselinACarillonSCoulibalyKRiddeVTaéronCKohouV, et al. Participatory development and pilot testing of the Makasi intervention: a community-based outreach intervention to improve sub-Saharan and Caribbean immigrants’ empowerment in sexual health. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 1646.
18.
NinacsW.Empowerment et service social: approches et enjeux. Serv Soc. 1995; 44: 69–93.
19.
GosselinADercheNNotemiRFKohouVMbiribindiRTaéronC, et al. Faire une recherche communautaire: les rouages d’une rencontre. In: Desgrees-du-LouAGosselinA (éds). Vers l’empowerment en santé: recherches communautaires autour du projet Makasi. Paris: ANRS | MIE; 2023, pp.99–111. (Collection Sciences sociales et sida).
20.
MillerWRRollnickS.L’entretien motivationnel - 2e éd.- Aider la personne à engager le changement: Aider la personne à engager le changement. 2e éd. Paris: InterEditions; 2013. pp.448.
21.
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis. MAKASI. An Intervention for African and Caribbean Migrants’ Empowerment in Sexual Health in Order to Reduce Their Social and Health Vulnerabilities in Paris Greater Area [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov;2020 [cité le 6 mars 2023]. Report No.: NCT04468724. Disponible sur: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04468724
22.
TremblayMCRichardLBrousselleABeaudetN.Learning reflexively from a health promotion professional development program in Canada. Health Promot Int. 2014; 29: 538–548.
23.
World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion: First International Conference on Health Promotion. Ottawa: World Health Organization;1986.
24.
RavalihasyARudeNYazdanpanahYKardas-SlomaLDesgréesduLoûAGosselinA, et al. Development and validation of an HIV/AIDS empowerment scale for impact intervention evaluation. An example from the MAKASI intervention. Am J Health Educ. 2021; 52: 296–306.
25.
LikertR.A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932; 140: 55.
26.
CoulibalyKBousmahMalQRavalihasyATaéronCMbiribindiRSenneJN, et al. Bridging the knowledge gap of biomedical HIV prevention tools among sub-saharan african immigrants in France. Results from an empowerment-based intervention. SSM - Popul Health. 2023; 23: 101468.
27.
BousmahM al Q.Impact d’une intervention d’empowerment en santé sur l’accès àla couverture maladie chez des personnes immigrées en situation de précarité (projet Makasi). In: SP9 Santé sexuelle [Internet]. France; 2022 [Consulté le 10 juin 2024]. Disponible sur: https://afravih2022.org/replays
28.
RavalihasyACoulibalyKBousmahM al Q.La mesure de l’empowerment en santé sexuelle: réflexion critique sur les indicateurs. In: Desgrees-du-Lou A, Gosselin A (éds). Vers l’empowerment en santé: recherches communautaires autour du projet Makasi. Paris: ANRS | MIE; 2023, pp. 35–44. (Collection Sciences sociales et sida).
29.
BousmahMalQGosselinACoulibalyKRavalihasyATaéronCSenneJN, et al. Immigrants’ health empowerment and access to health coverage in France: a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial. Soc Sci Med. 2023; 339: 116400.
GosselinAdu LoûADLelièvreELertFDray-SpiraRLydiéN, et al. Understanding settlement pathways of African immigrants in France through a capability approach: do pre-migratory characteristics matter?Eur J Popul Rev Eur Démographie. 2018; 34: 849–871.
35.
RyanLGoldenA.‘Tick the box please’: a reflexive approach to doing quantitative social research. Sociology. 2006; 40: 1191–1200.
36.
WallersteinN.Powerlessness, empowerment, and health: implications for health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1992; 6: 197–205.
37.
ZimmermanMA.Taking aim on empowerment research: on the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. Am J Community Psychol. 1990; 18: 169–77.
38.
BoatengGONeilandsTBFrongilloEAMelgar-QuiñonezHRYoungSL.Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health. 2018; 6: 149.
39.
GlasgowRERileyWT.Pragmatic measures: what they are and why we need them. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45: 237–243.
40.
FettermanDM.Empowerment evaluation principles in practice: assessing levels of commitment. In: FettermanDMWandersmanA (éds). Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2005, pp.42–72.
41.
WandersmanASnell-JohnsJLentzBEFettermanDMKeenerDCLivetM, et al. The principles of empowerment evaluation. In:
FettermanDMWandersmanA (éds). Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2005, pp.27–41.
42.
JamiesonMKGovaartGHPownallM.Reflexivity in quantitative research: a rationale and beginner’s guide. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2023; 17: 10.1111.
43.
SalwaySChowbeyPSuchEFergusonB.Researching health inequalities with community researchers: practical, methodological and ethical challenges of an ‘inclusive’ research approach. Res Involv Engagem. 2015; 1: 9.
44.
CloosP.La racialisation de la santé publique aux États-Unis : entre pouvoir sur la vie et droit de laisser mourir. Glob Health Promot. 2012; 19: 68–75.
45.
FassinD.Généalogies. Entre pouvoirs et savoirs. In: Hygée (éds). Faire de la santé publique. Rennes, France: Presses de l’EHESP;2008, pp.15–34. (Hors collection).
46.
KellyCDansereauLSebringJAubrechtKFitzGeraldMLeeY, et al. Intersectionality, health equity, and EDI: what’s the difference for health researchers?Int J Equity Health. 2022; 21: 182.
47.
HolmanDSalwaySBellABeachBAdebajoAAliN, et al. Can intersectionality help with understanding and tackling health inequalities? Perspectives of professional stakeholders. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021; 19: 97.
48.
RobertEMerryLBenoîtMGuimaraesDBRuiz-CasaresM.Rien ne doit se faire pour eux sans eux : renforcer la participation des demandeurs d’asile, réfugiés et migrants sans statut et des organismes communautaires dans la recherche en santé. Can J Public Health. 2018; 109: 312–315.
49.
RiddeVCarillonSDesgrées du LoûASombiéI.Analyzing implementation of public health interventions : a need for rigor, and the challenges of stakeholder involvement. Rev DÉpidémiologie Santé Publique. 2022; 71: 101376. S0398762022003650.
50.
ArgyrisCSchönDA.Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass publ;1992. (The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series).
51.
van DraanenJ.Introducing reflexivity to evaluation practice: an in-depth case study. Am J Eval. 2017; 38: 360–375.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
