World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2018 [citado el 25 de marzo del 2023], 101 p. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272722
GutholdRStevensGARileyLMBullFC.Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6: E1077–E1086.
4.
ZubalaAMacGillivraySFrostHKrollTSkeltonDAGavineA, et al. Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: a systematic review of reviews. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0180902.
5.
TafireyiCGSGraceJM.The physical activity and health promotion activities of global university students: a review of reviews. Glob Health Promot. 2022; 29: 17579759221099308.
6.
SanchezABullyPMartinezCGrandesG.Effectiveness of physical activity promotion interventions in primary care: a review of reviews. Prev Med. 2015; 76(Suppl):S56–S67.
7.
IckesMJSharmaM.A systematic review of physical activity interventions in Hispanic adults. J Environ Public Health. 2012; 2012: 156435.
8.
TaylorCJanS.Economic evaluation of medicines. Aust Prescr. 2017; 40: 76–78.
9.
RudmikLDrummondM.Health economic evaluation: important principles and methodology. Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 1341–1347.
10.
DrummondMFSculpherMJClaxtonKStoddartGLTorranceGW.Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
García-ÁlvarezDSempere-RubioNFaubelR.Economic evaluation in neurological physiotherapy: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 2021; 11: 265.
13.
Abu-OmarKRüttenABurlacuISchätzleinVMessingSSuhrckeM.The cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: a systematic review of reviews. Prev Med Rep. 2017; 8: 72–78.
14.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPMBoutronIHoffmannTCMulrowCD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71.
McHughML.Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012; 22: 276–282.
17.
AdabPBarrettTBhopalRCadeJECanawayAChengKK, et al. The West Midlands ActiVe lifestyle and healthy Eating in School children (WAVES) study: a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted obesity prevention intervention programme targeted at children aged 6-7 years. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2018; 22: 1–608.
18.
AkanniOOSmithMLOryMG.Cost-Effectiveness of a community exercise and nutrition program for older adults: texercise select. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14: 545.
19.
AnokyeNMansfieldLKayTSangheraSLewinAFox-RushbyJ.The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex community sport intervention to increase physical activity: an interrupted time series design. BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e024132.
20.
AnokyeNFox-RushbyJSangheraSCookDGLimbEFurnessC, et al. Short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based exercise intervention in primary care: a within-trial analysis and beyond-trial modelling. BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e021978.
21.
AudreySFisherHCooperAGauntDMetcalfeCGarfieldK, et al. A workplace-based intervention to increase levels of daily physical activity: the Travel to Work cluster RCT [Internet]. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2019 [citado el 24 de marzo del2021]. (Public Health Research). Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541952/
22.
BachireddyCJoungAJohnLKGinoFTuckfieldBFoschiniL, et al. Effect of different financial incentive structures on promoting physical activity among adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2: e199863.
23.
BarrettSBeggSO’HalloranPKingsleyM.Cost-effectiveness of telephone coaching for physically inactive ambulatory care hospital patients: economic evaluation alongside the healthy4U randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e032500.
24.
BeattyTKMKatareB.Low-cost approaches to increasing gym attendance. J Health Econ. 2018; 61: 63–76.
25.
BeetsMWBrazendaleKGlenn WeaverRTurner-McGrievyGMHubertyJMooreJB, et al. Economic evaluation of a group randomized controlled trial on healthy eating and physical activity in afterschool programs. Prev Med. 2018; 106: 60–65.
26.
BroekhuizenKSimmonsDDevliegerRvan AsscheAJansGGaljaardS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of healthy eating and/or physical activity promotion in pregnant women at increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: economic evaluation alongside the DALI study, a European multicenter randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018; 15: 23.
27.
BudworthLPrestwichASykes-MuskettBKhatunKIrelandJClancyF, et al. A feasibility study to assess the individual and combined effects of financial incentives and monetary contingency contracts on physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019; 44: 42–50.
28.
CorderKSharpSJJongSTFoubisterCBrownHEWellsEK, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: a cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020; 17: e1003210.
29.
CowperPAPetersonMJPieperCFSloaneRJHallKSMcConnellES, et al. Economic analysis of primary care-based physical activity counseling in older men: the VA-LIFE trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017; 65: 533–539.
30.
de VriesNMStaalJBvan der WeesPJAdangEMMAkkermansROlde RikkertMGM, et al. Patient-centred physical therapy is (cost-) effective in increasing physical activity and reducing frailty in older adults with mobility problems: a randomized controlled trial with 6 months follow-up. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016; 7: 422–435.
31.
EwaldBStaceyFJohnsonNPlotnikoffRCHollidayEBrownW, et al. Physical activity coaching by Australian exercise physiologists is cost effective for patients referred from general practice. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018; 42: 12–15.
32.
FisherKLReederBAHarrisonELBrunerBGAshworthNLPahwaP, et al. Comparing class-based and home-based exercise for older adults with chronic health conditions: 12-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. J Aging Phys Act. 2018; 26: 471–485.
33.
GalárragaOBohlenLCDunsigerSILeeHHEmersonJABoyleHK, et al. Small sustainable monetary donation-based incentives to promote physical activity: a randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2020; 39: 265–268.
34.
GalavizKIEstabrooksPAUlloaEJLeeREJanssenILópezy Taylor J, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of physician counseling to promote physi-cal activity in Mexico: an effectiveness-implementation hybrid study. Transl Behav Med. 2017; 7: 731–740.
35.
GammonCMortonKAtkinACorderKDaly-SmithAQuarmbyT, et al. Introducing physically active lessons in UK secondary schools: feasibility study and pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e025080.
36.
GanesanANLouiseJHorsfallMBilsboroughSAHendriksJMcGaviganAD, et al. International mobile-health intervention on physical activity, sitting, and weight: the Stepathlon cardiovascular health study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 2453–2463.
37.
Gonzalez-VianaAViolan ForsMCastell AbatCRubinat MasotMOliverasLGarcia-GilJ, et al. Promoting physical activity through primary health care: the case of Catalonia. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18: 968.
38.
GrayCMWykeSZhangRAndersonASBarrySBoyerN, et al. Long-term weight loss trajectories following participation in a randomised controlled trial of a weight management programme for men delivered through professional football clubs: a longitudinal cohort study and economic evaluation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018; 15: 60.
39.
GriffinJBStruemplerBFunderburkKParmerSMTranCWadsworthDD.My Quest, an intervention using text messaging to improve dietary and physical activity behaviors and promote weight loss in low-income women. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018; 50: 11–18.e1.
40.
GuaglianoJMArmitageSBrownHCoombesEFuscoFHughesC, et al. A whole family-based physical activity promotion intervention: findings from the families reporting every step to health (FRESH) pilot randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020; 17: 120.
41.
HardemanWMitchellJPearsSVan EmmenisMTheilFGcVS, et al. Evaluation of a very brief pedometer-based physical activity intervention delivered in NHS health checks in England: the VBI randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020; 17: e1003046.
42.
HarringtonDMDaviesMJBodicoatDCharlesJMChudasamaYVGorelyT, et al. A school-based intervention (‘Girls Active’) to increase physical activity levels among 11- to 14-year-old girls: cluster RCT [Internet]. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2019 [citado el 24 de marzo del 2021]. (Public Health Research). Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537515/
43.
HarrisTKerrySVictorCIliffeSUssherMFox-RushbyJ, et al. A pedometer-based walking intervention in 45- to 75-year-olds, with and without practice nurse support: the PACE-UP three-arm cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2018; 22: 1–274.
44.
HoltRIHindDGossage-WorrallRBradburnMJSaxonDMcCroneP, et al. Structured lifestyle education to support weight loss for people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first episode psychosis: the STEPWISE RCT. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2018; 22: 1–160.
45.
JagoRTibbittsBSandersonEBirdELPorterAMetcalfeC, et al. Action 3:30R: results of a cluster randomised feasibility study of a revised teaching assistant-led extracurricular physical activity intervention for 8 to 10 year olds. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16: 131.
46.
JagoRTibbittsBWillisKSandersonEKandiyaliRReidT, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLAN-A intervention, a peer led physical activity program for adolescent girls: results of a cluster randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021; 18: 63.
47.
KhuntiKGriffinSBrennanADallossoHDaviesMEborallH, et al. Behavioural interventions to promote physical activity in a multiethnic population at high risk of diabetes: PROPELS three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2021; 25: 1–190.
48.
KramerJNTinschertPScholzUFleischEKowatschT.A cluster-randomized trial on small incentives to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2019; 56: e45–e54.
49.
KrankerK.The efficacy of using financial incentives to change unhealthy behaviors among a rural chronically ill and uninsured population. Am J Health Promot AJHP. 2018; 32: 301–311.
50.
LalAMoodieMAbbottGCarverASalmonJGiles-CortiB, et al. The impact of a park refurbishment in a low socioeconomic area on physical activity: a cost-effectiveness study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019; 16: 26.
51.
LarsenBMarcusBPekmeziDHartmanSGilmerT.A web-based physical activity intervention for Spanish-speaking Latinas: a costs and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19: e43.
52.
LauruschkusKHallströmIWestbomLTornbergÅNordmarkE.Participation in physical activities for children with cerebral palsy: feasibility and effectiveness of physical activity on prescription. Arch Physiother. 2017; 7: 13.
53.
LawlorDAKippingRRAndersonELHoweLDChittleboroughCRMoure-FernandezA, et al. Active for Life Year 5: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a primary school-based intervention to increase levels of physical activity, decrease sedentary behaviour and improve diet [Internet]. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2016 [citado el 24 de marzo del 2021]. (Public Health Research). Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK368536/
54.
LeeRMBarrettJLDalyJGMozaffarianRSGilesCMCradockAL, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of training models for national scale-up of an evidence-based nutrition and physical activity intervention: a group randomized trial. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 1587.
55.
LiACurielHRagotzySPPolingA.Using a lottery to promote physical activity by young adults with developmental disabilities. Behav Anal Pract. 2019; 12: 612–616.
56.
LiBPallanMLiuWJHemmingKFrewELinR, et al. The CHIRPY DRAGON intervention in preventing obesity in Chinese primary-school–aged children: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2019; 16: e1002971.
57.
MasonMRIckesMJCampbellMSBollingerLM.An incentivized, workplace physical activity intervention preferentially increases daily steps in inactive employees. Am J Health Promot. 2018; 32: 638–645.
58.
McKnightTDemuthJRWilsonNLeiderJPKnudsonA.Assessing effectiveness and cost-benefit of the trinity hospital twin city fit for life program for weight loss and diabetes prevention in a rural Midwestern town. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018; 15: E98.
59.
MendesRAlmeidaA. Costs of a community-based exercise program for patients with type 2 diabetes: case study of diabetes em Movimento®. Aten Primaria. 2016; 48: 72 ((Mendes R., romeuduartemendes@gmail.com) Unidade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Universidade do Porto, Portugal).
60.
MitsunagaPKBandiniMde LuccaSRMoreira-FilhoDdeC.Assessment of a physical activity program on the medical-hospital costs of a healthcare company. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2018; 16: 121–127.
61.
MunirFMillerPBiddleSDaviesMDunstanDEsligerD, et al. A cost and cost-benefit analysis of the Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work) intervention. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2020 [citado el 15 de Junio del 2023]; 17(4)
. Disponible en: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/central/doi/10.1002/central/CN-02084554/full
RobertsonWFlemingJKamalAHamborgTKhanKAGriffithsF, et al. Randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of «Families for Health», a family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention delivered in a community setting for ages 6 to 11 years. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2017; 21: 1–180.
64.
RushingJWingRWaddenTAKnowlerWCLawlorMEvansM, et al. Cost of intervention delivery in a lifestyle weight loss trial in type 2 diabetes: results from the look AHEAD clinical trial. Obes Sci Pract. 2017; 3: 15–24.
65.
Sainz-GuineaAGrandesGSánchezaÁMartínezCPomboHBullyP, et al. Efficiency of ‘Prescribe Vida Saludable’, a health promotion innovation. Pilot phase. Gac Sanit. 2017; 31: 404–409.
66.
SchouwDDMashR.Cost and consequence analysis of the healthy choices at work programme to prevent non-communicable diseases in a commercial power plant, South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020; 12: e1–e8.
67.
ShortKRChadwickJQCannadyTKBranamDEWhartonDFTullierMA, et al. Using financial incentives to promote physical activity in American Indian adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0198390.
68.
SimpsonSACoulmanEGallagherDJewellKCohenDNewcombeRG, et al. Healthy eating and lifestyle in pregnancy (HELP): a cluster randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a weight management intervention for pregnant women with obesity on weight at 12 months postpartum. Int J Obes. 2021; 45: 1728–1739.
69.
SutherlandRReevesPCampbellELubansDRMorganPJNathanN, et al. Cost effectiveness of a multi-component school-based physical activity intervention targeting adolescents: the ‘Physical Activity 4 Everyone’ cluster randomized trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016; 13: 94.
70.
TaylorAHTaylorRSIngramWMAnokyeNDeanSJollyK, et al. Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER RCT. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2020; 24: 1–106.
71.
TowneSDLiYLeeSSmithMLHanGQuinnC, et al. Physical activity and associated medical cost savings among at-risk older adults participating a community-based health & wellness program. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0198239.
72.
van der SwaluwKLambooijMSMathijssenJJPSchipperMZeelenbergMBerkhoutS, et al. Commitment lotteries promote physical activity among overweight adults-A cluster randomized trial. Ann Behav Med. 2018; 52: 342–351.
73.
WangHLiTSiahpushMChenLWHubertyJ.Cost-effectiveness of ready for recess to promote physical activity in children. J Sch Health. 2017; 87: 278–285.
74.
Ward ThompsonCSilveirinha de OliveiraETilleySElizaldeABothaWBriggsA, et al. Health impacts of environmental and social interventions designed to increase deprived communities’ access to urban woodlands: a mixed-methods study [Internet]. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2019 [citado el 24 de marzo del 2021]. (Public Health Research). Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535742/
75.
WatersEGibbsLTadicMUkoumunneOCMagareyAOkelyAD, et al. Cluster randomised trial of a school-community child health promotion and obesity prevention intervention: findings from the evaluation of fun ’n healthy in Moreland!. BMC Public Health. 2017; 18: 92.
76.
WebbJFife-SchawCOgdenJ.A randomised control trial and cost-consequence analysis to examine the effects of a print-based intervention supported by internet tools on the physical activity of UK cancer survivors. Public Health. 2019; 171: 106–115.
77.
WhelanMEGoodeADEakinEGVeermanJLWinklerEAHHickmanIJ, et al. Feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telephone-based weight loss program delivered via a hospital outpatient setting. Transl Behav Med. 2016; 6: 386–395.
78.
WurstRMaliezefskiARamsenthalerCBrameJFuchsR.Effects of Incentives on adherence to a web-based intervention promoting physical activity: naturalistic study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22: e18338.
79.
WykeSBunnCAndersenESilvaMNvan NassauFMcSkimmingP, et al. The effect of a programme to improve men’s sedentary time and physical activity: the European Fans in Training (EuroFIT) randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2019; 16: e1002736.
80.
ZhengXSpatzESBaiXHuoXDingQHorakP, et al. Effect of text messaging on risk factor management in patients with coronary heart disease: the CHAT randomized clinical trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019; 12: e005616.
81.
ZwerinkMEffingTKerstjensHAMvan der ValkPBrusse-KeizerMZielhuisG, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a community-based exercise programme in COPD self-management. COPD. 2016; 13: 214–223.
82.
VijayGCWilsonECFSuhrckeMHardemanWSuttonS; VBI Programme Team. Are brief interventions to increase physical activity cost-effective? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 408–417.
83.
Dubas-JakóbczykKKocotEKissimova-SkarbekKHuterKRothgangH.Economic evaluation of health promotion and primary prevention actions for older people-a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2017; 27: 670–679.
HoltermannAStrakerLLeeIMStamatakisEvan der BeekAJ.Workplace physical activity promotion: why so many failures and few successes? The need for new thinking. Br J Sports Med. 2021; 55: 650–651.
87.
MichishitaRJiangYAriyoshiDYoshidaMMoriyamaHObataY, et al. The introduction of an active rest program by workplace units improved the workplace vigor and presenteeism among workers: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Environ Med. 2017; 59: 1140–1147.
88.
NICE. Overview. Physical activity: brief advice for adults in primary care. Guidance [Internet]. NICE; 2013 [citado el 7 de junio del 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph44
89.
FletcherGFLandolfoCNiebauerJOzemekCArenaRLavieCJ.Promoting physical activity and exercise: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 1622–1639.
90.
ZhangYHasibagen, ZhangC.The influence of social support on the physical exercise behavior of college students: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Front Psychol. 2022; 13: 1037518.
91.
LuongMLNHallMBennellKLKaszaJHarrisAHinmanRS. The impact of financial incentives on physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Health Promot. 2021; 35: 236–249.
92.
SiegelJETorranceGWRussellLBLuceBRWeinsteinMCGoldMR.Guidelines for phar-macoeconomic studies. Recommendations from the panel on cost effectiveness in health and medicine. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997; 11: 159–168.
93.
CrottyMvan den BergMLiuEKaambwaBvan WegenEKwakkelG. Cost-effectiveness of caregiver-mediated exercises combined with e-health services after stroke: Annual Conference of the Asia Pacific Stroke Conference (APSO) combined with stroke society of Australasia. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016; 42(Suppl 1): 156.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
