evaluar el apoyo organizacional percibido y los comportamientos de empoderamiento en mujeres sobrevivientes de cáncer de mama, activas laboralmente, en un centro de referencia oncológico.
Métodos:
estudio descriptivo en el que se recolectaron datos sobre las características sociodemográficas, laborales, clínicas, las secuelas del tratamiento, los comportamientos de empoderamiento y la percepción del apoyo organizacional.
Resultados:
Cerca del 90% de las mujeres conservó el trabajo anterior al diagnóstico. El 69% reportó que sus ingresos se mantuvieron iguales. La mayoría de las mujeres participantes percibieron bajo apoyo organizacional, y este cambia según la presencia de algunas secuelas del tratamiento. El 49.6% de las participantes había adoptado totalmente comportamientos de empoderamiento que varían significativamente de acuerdo con la edad, la presencia de secuelas, el apoyo organizacional percibido y el tiempo de retorno al trabajo.
Conclusión:
Las secuelas del tratamiento tienen influencia sobre el apoyo organizacional percibido y la adopción de comportamientos de empoderamiento.
Organizacion Panamericana de la Salud. Enfermedades no transmisibles y salud mental: cancer Washington: Organizacion Panamericana de la Salud. 2018. [Consultado el 2021 September 1]. Disponible en https://www.paho.org/es/temas/cancer-mama
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Estimated age-standardized incidence rates (World) in 2018, Colombia, females, all ages Lyon 2019. 2019. [cited 2021 November 20]. Available from https://gco.iarc.fr/today/online-analysis-multi-bars?v=2018
4.
SaundersSLNedelecB.What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014; 24: 100–110.
5.
HeuserCHalbachSKowalskiCEndersAPfaffHErnstmannN.Sociodemographic and disease-related determinants of return to work among women with breast cancer: a German longitudinal cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18: 1000.
6.
Stergiou-KitaMGrigorovichATseungVMilosevicEHebertDPhanS, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014; 8: 657–670.
7.
IslamTDahluiMMajidHANaharAMMohd TaibNASuTT; MyBCC study group. Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14(Suppl 3): S8.
RhoadesLEisenbergerR.Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. J Appl Psychol. 2002; 87: 698–714.
10.
DaiKQinX.Perceived organizational support and employee engagement: based on the research of organizational identification and organizational justice. Open J Soc Sci. 2016; 4: 46–57.
11.
HaoJWangJLiuLWuWWuH.Perceived organizational support impacts on the associations of work-family conflict or family-work conflict with depressive symptoms among Chinese doctors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13: 326.
12.
BukhariSAlamNBatoolAHussainYAsimSKhatttakN, et al. Perceived organizational support predicts emotional labor among nurses. Asian Soc Sci. 2020; 16: 68.
13.
KurtessisJNEisenbergerRFordMTBuffardiLCStewartKAAdisCS.Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J Manage. 2017; 43: 1854–1884.
14.
AselageJEisenbergerR.Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration. J Organ Behav. 2003; 24: 491–509.
15.
AhmedIIsmailWKWAminSMIslamT.Role of perceived organizational support in teachers’ responsiveness and students’ outcomes: evidence from a public sector University of Pakistan. Int J Edu Manage. 2014; 28, 246–256.
16.
AujoulatId’HooreWDeccacheA.Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony?Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 66: 13–20.
17.
BailoLGuiddiPVerganiLMartonGPravettoniG.The patient perspective: investigating patient empowerment enablers and barriers within the oncological care process. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019; 13: 912.
18.
GibsonCH.The process of empowerment in mothers of chronically ill children. J Adv Nurs. 1995; 21: 1201–1210.
19.
TaleghaniFBahramiMLoripoorMYousefiA.Empowerment needs of women with breast cancer: a qualitative study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16: e16379.
ZimmermanMA. Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. Am J Community Psychol. 1995; 23: 581–599.
22.
KimMBeehrTPrewettM.Employee responses to empowering leadership: a meta-analysis. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2018; 25: 154805181775053.
23.
BoudriasJSMorinAJSLajoieD.Directionality of the associations between psychological empowerment and behavioural involvement: a longitudinal autoregressive cross-lagged analysis. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2014; 87: 437–463.
24.
FisherMIHowellD.The power of empowerment: an ICF-based model to improve self-efficacy and upper extremity function of survivors of breast cancer. Rehabil Oncol. 2010; 28: 19.
25.
JørgensenCRThomsenTGRossLDietzSMTherkildsenSGroenvoldM, et al. What faci-litates “patient empowerment” in cancer patients during follow-up: a qualitative systematic review of the literature. Qual Health Res. 2017; 28: 292–304.
26.
LuoZChenCXuWWangPWangY.A qualitative study on the experience of empowerment from the perspectives of breast cancer survivors. Nurs Open. 2021; 8: 2429–2438.
27.
TorpSBruslettoBWithbroTBNygaardBSharpL.Work Experiences during and after treatment among self-employed people with cancer. J Occup Rehabil. 2020; 30: 49–58.
28.
BoudriasJSSavoieA.Les manifestations comportementales de l'habilitation au travail : développement d'un cadre conceptuel et d'un instrument de mesure. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations. 2006; 12: 119–138.
29.
BoudriasJSGaudreauPSavoieAMorin AlexandreJS.Employee empowerment: from managerial practices to employees’ behavioral empowerment. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2009; 30: 625–638.
30.
Román-CalderónJPKrikorianARuizCFGaviriaAB.Apoyo organizacional y empoderamiento como antecedentes de comportamientos empoderados y participación de los empleados. Estudios Gerenciales. 2016; 32: 154–161.
31.
OrtegaV.Adaptación al castellano de la versión abreviada de Survey of Perceived Organizational Support. Encuentros en Psicología Social. 2003; 1: 3–6.
32.
AzarkishFNajmabadiKMRoudsariRLShandizFH.Factors related to return to work in women after breast cancer in Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015; 17: e19978.
33.
Vasquez-TrespalaciosEMAtehortua-SalazarSArango-IsazaDGallego VélezCPGallón VillegasLJ.Reincorporación laboral de mujeres con cáncer de mama: experiencia de un centro oncológico en la ciudad de Medellín. Archivos de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales. 2020; 23: 315–329.
34.
BalakFRoelenCAMKoopmansPCTen BergeEEGroothoffJW.Return to work after early-stage breast cancer: a cohort study into the effects of treatment and cancer-related symptoms. J Occup Rehabil. 2008; 18: 267–272.
35.
LangerDMagenHTendlerSErezAB-H. Occupational and functional implications of breast cancer among Israeli women. Am J Occup Ther. 2021; 75(Suppl 2): 7512510269p1.
36.
SaitoNTakahashiMSairenchiTMutoT.The impact of breast cancer on employment among Japanese women. J Occup Health. 2014; 56: 49–55.
37.
AhnEChoJShinDWParkBWAhnSHNohDY, et al. Impact of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment on work-related life and factors affecting them. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009; 116: 609–616.
38.
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Boletín Técnico Gran Encuesta Integrada de Hogares (GEIH) Abril - junio 2021. Santa Fe de Bogota. 2021.
39.
JagsiRAbrahamsePHLeeKLWallnerLPJanzNKHamiltonAS, et al. Treatment decisions and employment of breast cancer patients: results of a population-based survey. Cancer. 2017; 123: 4791–4799.
40.
Parra GómezCEGarcía SánchezLVInsuasty EnriquezJ.Experiencias de vida en mujeres con cáncer de mama en quimioterapia. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría. 2011; 40: 65–84.
41.
GregorowitschMLvan den BongardHJGDCouwenbergAMYoung-AfatDAHaaringCVan DalenT, et al.; UMBRELLA study group. Self-reported work ability in breast cancer survivors; a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands. Breast. 2019; 48, 45–53.
42.
GudbergssonSBFossåSDLindbohmM-LDahlAA.Received and needed social support at the workplace in Norwegian and finnish stage 1 breast cancer survivors: a study from the Nordic Study Group of Cancer and Work (NOCWO). Acta Oncol. 2009; 48: 67–75.
43.
CaesensGBouchatPStinglhamberF.Perceived organizational support and psychological empower-ment: a multi-sample study. J Occup Environ Med. 2020; 62: 526–531.
44.
Arda SürücüHBüyükkaya BesenD. Predictors of empowerment in individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Transcult Nurs. 2018; 29: 506–513.
45.
LiMGaoJLiMWangL.The assessment of returning to work following treatment and the associated personal, disease, and treatment factors among breast cancer survivors in central China. Support Care Cancer. 2021; 29: 7627–7636.
46.
ZamanzadehVValizadehLRahmaniAZirakMDesironH.Cancer survivors’ experiences of return to work: a qualitative study. Psychooncology. 2018; 27: 2398–2404.
47.
LindbohmM-LKuosmaETaskilaTHietanenPCarlsenKGudbergssonS, et al. Early retirement and non-employment after breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2014; 23: 634–641.
48.
ChiangC-FHsiehT-S.The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: the mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior. Int J Hosp Manag. 2012; 31: 180–190.
49.
DuijtsSFAvan EgmondMPGitsMvan der BeekAJBleikerEM. Cancer survivors’ perspectives and experiences regarding behavioral determinants of return to work and continuation of work. Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 39: 2164–2172.
50.
KumarNLiuZJinY.Evaluation of employee empowerment on taking charge behaviour: an application of perceived organizational support as a moderator. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022; 15: 1055–1066.
51.
MakAKYChaidaroonSFanGThalibF. Unintended consequences: the social context of cancer survivors and work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014; 8: 269–281.
